Principles Of Corporate Finance Unit M Lectures PDF

Summary

These lecture notes cover hedging in corporate finance, including definitions, consequences, benefits and reasons for hedging. It explores the costs and typical instruments.

Full Transcript

Hedging Hedging Definition • A hedge is a financial transaction which offsets the risk of a real asset. • When the real asset rises in value, the hedge loses money. • When the real asset falls in value, the hedge makes money. • Perfect vs imperfect hedging: If the hedge is perfect, the gains from...

Hedging Hedging Definition • A hedge is a financial transaction which offsets the risk of a real asset. • When the real asset rises in value, the hedge loses money. • When the real asset falls in value, the hedge makes money. • Perfect vs imperfect hedging: If the hedge is perfect, the gains from one and the losses from the other are perfectly correlated. Consequences • Risks are transferred, not eliminated. • If the risk is systematic, you must pay someone else to bear the risk. • Thus, even a perfect hedge of a systematic risk loses money on average. The End Good and Bad Reasons to Hedge Should Firms Hedge? • In an MM world there is no place for hedging • Reducing the risk to security holders has no value if they can hedge those risks (or the consequences of those risks) themselves. • Thus, for hedging to be optimal one or more of the M&M assumptions must be violated Good Reasons to Hedge 1. Lower the expected cost of financial distress via the reduction of the probability of bankruptcy • Financial market for the risk may not exist (future of a city: London, NYC) • Non-hedging ways to reduce bankruptcy risk • Lower financial leverage: debt/assets (but valuation consequences) • Lower operating leverage: fixed costs/total costs Example • Suppose firms A and B have the following CF: Firm A Firm B State 1 (50%) 50 100 State 2 (50%) 100 50 • Suppose whenever CF < 60, the firm fails. • Bankruptcy costs 20% of firm value. • If CF = 50, the firm fails and its value will be 50 × (1 − 20%) = 40 due to bankruptcy. • Firm value (for both A and B) without hedging is: 1 1 × 100 + × 40 = 70 2 2 Example (cont.) • Firms A and B can sign a contract. • In State 1, B gives A 25. In State 2, A gives B 25. Firm A Firm B State 1 (50%) State 2 (50%) 75 75 75 75 • There is no bankruptcy. • The firm value is 75 > 70. • Value of hedging = 5 for each firm. Good Reasons to Hedge 2. Lower the risk of being financially constrained • Investment opportunities may arrive when the company’s cash flow is low. • Security sales are costly. • Imperfect capital markets • Perceived risk is higher • Consider carefully the nature of the business. • Are corporate cash flows and the arrival of positive NPV opportunities correlated? • If investment opportunities and cash flows are not constant then hedging can be value-enhancing or value-destroying. • If cash flows and positive NPV opportunities are positively correlated, then hedging is not beneficial. • If cash flows and positive NPV opportunities are negatively correlated, then hedging is beneficial. Reduce Financial Constraints: Example Example: CF and investment opportunities are positively correlated. • Cash flow is either 60 or 100 • Firm has an investment project that costs 75 and returns NPV of 20 in the good state only Unhedged asset cash flow Hedged asset cash flow Bad (50%) Good (50%) 60 80 100 + 20 80 + 20 • If the firm hedges it has an expected CF of 90; if it does not hedge the expected CF is 90 (60 or 120) • No gains from hedging Reduce Financial Constraints: Example (cont.) Example: CF and investment opportunities are negatively correlated. • Cash flow is either 60 or 100 • Firm has an investment project that costs 75 and returns NPV of 20 in the bad state only Unhedged asset cash flow Hedged asset cash flow Bad (50%) Good (50%) 60 80 + 20 100 80 • If the firm hedges it has an expected CF of 90; if it does not hedge the expected CF is 80 (60 or 100) • Gains from hedging Good Reasons to Hedge 3. Managers are risk-averse • Managers’ human capital is tied to the firm. • Managers cannot diversify the risk, though from the point of view of investors the risk is idiosyncratic. • It may make sense to insure the manager, but the firm should hedge only if there is not a cheaper way to provide the managers with insurance. • Why are managers forced to bear the firm’s risk? Who Should Hedge? • Closely held or private firms where investors are not diversified • Opaque firms that experience a significant asymmetric information problem; managers and bondholders may otherwise forego positive NPV projects • Intangible firms that are more exposed to costs of financial distress Bad Reasons to Hedge 4. Speculation • Hedging risk requires sophistication • Many treasury departments of many firms do not have the knowledge and/or guidance on how to reduce risk, especially at the highest level • In many cases those hedging get more credit if they make money rather than avoid losing money • Trading derivatives is more fun than letting shareholders diversify the risk • Many firms have speculated and lost staggering sums • Metallgesellschaft (German industrial firm) • A great need to develop sound monitoring systems within firms The End Insurance Hedging Instruments Typical instruments • Insurance • Derivatives: financial agreements/instruments/contracts whose returns are linked to, or derived from, the performance of underlying assets such as equity, bonds, currencies or commodities • Forward and futures contracts • Options • Swaps Insurance Definition • The insured party pays a fixed amount (the insurance premium) in exchange for the insurance company paying the variable cash flow (the loss) instead of the insured. This exchanges a variable cash flow for a fixed one. • Insurance is against (mostly idiosyncratic) risk • The insurance company diversifies much of the risk internally by selling many policies • The remaining risk is passed to shareholders through the securities market, where the security holders diversify the risk • For example, liability insurance for airline companies Is Insurance “Actuarially Fair”? • Insurance is actuarially fair if it is zero NPV • Insurance companies have advantages/disadvantages in bearing risk • Advantages in bearing risk • Skills in estimating probabilities • Skills in identifying risk-reduction techniques • Diversified risk pool • Disadvantages in bearing risk • Administrative costs • Adverse selection and moral hazard • Risk pool may have correlated risks (eg, AIG offered credit risk insurance) The End Financial Derivatives Hedging Instruments Typical instruments • Insurance • Derivatives: financial agreements/instruments/contracts whose returns are linked to, or derived from, the performance of underlying assets such as equity, bonds, currencies or commodities • Forward and futures contracts • Options • Swaps Forward and Futures Contracts Description • Agreement to trade an asset at a future date at a fixed price set today; the transaction price set today is called the forward/future price. • Many assets have futures markets including agricultural commodities (eg, corn and soybeans), non-agricultural commodities (eg, gold or fuel oil), and financial assets (eg, 30-year government bonds or Swiss francs). • Delivery – the actual commodity is not usually delivered (sometimes delivery is not allowed). • Traders usually reverse their position before the contract expires. Swaps • A swap is an exchange of one set of cash flows (eg, cash flows on a floating rate loan) for another of equivalent market value (eg, cash flows on a fixed rate loan). • Essentially a sequence of futures contracts • Example: interest rate swap • CRST receives floating-rate (eg, LIBOR) but has a fixed-rate liability. • Hanson receives fixed-rate but is liable for LIBOR. • There is a risk mismatch, so CRST and Hanson can enter into an interest rate swap. • CRST agrees to pay a floating rate to Hanson. • Hanson pays a fixed interest rate (the ‘swap rate’) to CRST. • The swap rate is set at 8% such that the transaction has zero NPV at initiation. • A significant risk in swap contracts is counterparty risk – that is, the risk that the hedge evaporates. Swaps: Example LIBOR CRST Hanson PLC Swap rate = 8% 8% Lender LIBOR Lender The End Hedging Costs Cost of Hedging • Risk premium • The risk premium depends on the type of risk. In general, you will have to pay to hedge systematic risk. • Transaction costs • To complete a hedge, the firm will have to pay transaction costs (eg, brokerage commissions and losses to more informed traders). • In the early 1980s, the bid-ask spread for swaps exceeded 100 basis points at times. • By 1995, it was as low as two basis points. • Let us consider an example of how the risk premium is incorporated into future prices. Futures Prices and Expected Spot Prices, Part I • The futures price is set today but will be paid next year. • The spot price is the price at which you can buy or sell the commodity immediately. • Is the futures price an unbiased estimate of the future spot price? • No. If there is a risk premium, then the two differ. Futures Prices and Expected Spot Prices, Part II • Suppose you enter into a futures contract today to sell a commodity (eg, gold) in one year at a fixed price (the futures price). • You (the seller) will receive the futures price but give up the future spot value of the commodity. NPV (futures/seller) = futures price E0 (spot price)  =0 − 1 + rcommodity value (1 + rfutures ) • Assume no default, so rfutures = rrisk-free . Futures Prices and Expected Spot Prices, Part III  futures price = E (spot price) × 1 + rf 1 + rc  • Where rf : risk-free rate, rc : commodity expected return • CAPM: rc = rf + βc × Market risk premium • βc = 0 → rc = rf → futures price = E(spot price) • βc > 0 → rc > rf → futures price < E(spot price) • βc < 0 → rc < rf → futures price > E(spot price) • Intuition: the seller contracts away a systematic risk, so they have to offer a discount in the future price as a compensation for the risk to the buyer The End

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser