Groupthink: Organizational Theory PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by UserReplaceablePyrite4262
University of Guelph
Tags
Summary
This document explains the concept of groupthink, focusing on its negative impact on organizational decision-making processes. It provides examples like the Japan auto industry and Kodak, illustrating how groupthink can lead to poor choices and missed opportunities. It outlines the preconditions and symptoms of groupthink. The document also emphasizes how to avoid groupthink by using techniques like assigning a 'devil's advocate' and encouraging diverse perspectives.
Full Transcript
# Organizational theory ## Groupthink ### What is Groupthink? > "Humans get trapped in a web of their own creations” – Psychic Prisons (Morgan Images of Organizations) - Organizations are created and sustained by conscious and unconscious processes - Organizations and its members get trapped in o...
# Organizational theory ## Groupthink ### What is Groupthink? > "Humans get trapped in a web of their own creations” – Psychic Prisons (Morgan Images of Organizations) - Organizations are created and sustained by conscious and unconscious processes - Organizations and its members get trapped in own constructed realities, ways of thinking, sensemaking, decision making ### Examples: - **Japan auto industry in the 1970s** - small, fuel-efficient cars "invaded" the North American market – NA auto makers shrugged it off as a non-threat; public saw Japan cars as junk and a joke - limited options - **Blockbuster – Netflix** - **Kodak:** complacency - people within the organization knew about obsolete concerns, and had solutions (digital), but the "top" would not listen ## Groupthink: Trapped Way of Doing Things - Failure to innovate, research and development - Failure to change bureaucratic process even as it becomes inefficient - Failure to listen to consumer needs - Failure to adapt to environmental issues - Failure to adapt to social issues - Gender, diversity, rights in the workplace - Gender - assign gender biased roles, positions, pay, discrimination ## Groupthink: Preconditions Members of a group all start to think alike – results in poor and immoral decision making (Irving Janis) Trap people into certain ways of thinking, and prevent the emergence of new ideas ### What are the preconditions? - High cohesiveness – little critical judgement, weak opposition - Stressful environment, culture - Group insulation from external environment (stakeholder) opinions - Establishment values deeply embedded - Lack of diversity - Directive leadership - Members want to be seen as part of the group - Sense of belonging - "Old boys club" ## Groupthink: Symptoms 1. **Invulnerability** – decision makers/managers are invulnerable/invincible, above criticism, overly optimistic 2. **Rationalization** – if there are dissenting/disagreeing opinions, they are rationalized away and debunked 3. **Morality** – think decisions are morally correct, even if they are unethical 4. **Stereotyping** – assign negative stereotypes 5. **(Peer) Pressure** – leaders/ certain members pressuring others for support, forego dissent 6. **Self-Censorship** – members do not voice concerns on an issue – no critical analysis – no devil's advocate 7. **Unanimity** – group believes everyone agrees, and assume silent members agree 8. **Mindguards** – someone takes it upon themselves to protect decision makers in the group from certain information – protect them from other's doubts, dissention – filtered information ## Groupthink Symptoms: Jonestown Case 1. **Invulnerability** - decision makers/managers are invulnerable/invincible, above criticism, overly optimistic - powerful, influential followers grew in numbers 2. **Rationalization** - if there are dissenting/ disagreeing opinions, they are rationalized away and debunked - you are in a better place, the alternative is concentration camps 3. **Morality** - think decisions are morally correct, even if they are unethical - creating a social justice society - people join a cult to be loved - welcome diversity, government not taking care of people (populist messages) 4. **Stereotyping** - assign negative stereotypes - government dictatorship, racial inequality, anti-capitalism - Used propaganda - his voice was always on the loudspeaker/PA, long speeches 5. **(Peer) Pressure** - leaders/ certain members pressuring others for support, forego dissent - Promised Land offered equality, no oppression, no racism, no government, Freedom - Pastor had power - charismatic, promises (own family made up of black, Asian kids - " I'll be whatever you want me to be" (father, brother, leader) - Blackmail, public beatings, took away passports, money - took away individuality - Got everything but worked long hours - people tired so did what he wanted - His speeches live and on speaker wore down people - they were exhausted, succumbed to whatever he wanted - control (Noriega music torture) 6. **Self-Censorship** - members do not voice concerns on an issue - no critical analysis – no devil's advocate - People feared speaking out - were beaten publicly, humiliated, fights 7. **Unanimity** - group believes everyone agrees, and assume silent members agree - everyone afraid to speak up, knew the consequences 8. **Mindguards** - someone takes its upon themselves to protect decision makers in the group from certain information - Jones wouldn't allow outside information, books, radio - called negative info against him as "FAKE NEWS" - US under attack we are not safe ## Avoiding Groupthink - Educate members on the pitfalls of groupthink - 6 Thinking Hats – different perspectives (next slide) - Assign a "devil's advocate” – be willing to hear all criticisms, objections - Increase awareness of all perspectives, causes, consequences – engage stakeholders - Use of outside experts – auditors and consultants - Use other groups to tackle the same issue - Establish ad-hoc groups to solve issues, or multiple groups solving an issue - Leader of the decision making group should be neutral (act as Chair) - Leader should allow objections, doubts, EXPLORE ALTERNATIVES - Reward contrasting opinions - Hold multiple discussion meetings before decisions made - Expose those with hidden doubts - Discuss intended decisions with stakeholders before implementing them ## Avoiding Groupthink: Six Thinking Hats - **White hat** - Facts - Figures - Information - **Black hat** - Critical judging - Checking - Devil's advocate - **Red hat** - Suspects - Opinions - Emotions - **Blue hat** - Thinking about thinking - Organization of the thinking process - Discipline and focus - Leadership - **Yellow hat** - Positive thinking - Concentrated on advantages - Call to action - **Green hat** - Creativity - New ideas - Change **Source:** https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjRnNO0weffAhUnTt8 KHXB7DfQQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.quinnassociation.com%2Fen%2Fthe_six_thinking_hats&psig=AOvVaw0QHdfvmQHlxDTSIk8fSE00&ust=1547357330913238