Challenges in Forensic Science Analysis

What is the issue highlighted in the text?

Which state in the USA is mentioned in the text regarding a pathologist faking autopsy results?

Who often tends to benefit from the misuse of scientific evidence according to the text?

What key criteria were reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals case?

What is the purpose of the Frye Test, Daubert Standard, and Kumho Doctrine?

In which case did plaintiffs sue a drug company for birth abnormalities allegedly induced by a medicine?

What criteria can be factored into hearings related to the admissibility of scientific or technological evidence?

Which criterion is essential for the scientific status of a theory according to K. Popper?

What aspect ensures flaws in methodology would have been detected for a scientific theory or technique?

Which consideration is important for determining the validity and reliability of tests?

What does the technique of a scientific expert need to rely on to ensure admissibility?

Why is it important that the technique and its results can be explained with sufficient community and simplicity?

Why has Questioned Documents been ruled as not requiring the Daubert test by many judges?

Which type of analysis is facing difficulties and has not been decided due to controversies over required qualifications for analysts?

Why have Voice Comparison techniques mostly failed the Daubert test?

What is the general stance of Philippine jurisprudence towards the Frye-Schwartz and Daubert-Kumho standards?

According to Section 3, Rule 128 of the Philippine Rules of Court, when is evidence considered admissible?

What is the key requirement for evidence to be deemed admissible under Philippine jurisprudence?