Week 3 - Individual Differences P2 PDF - Personality Psychology
Document Details
Uploaded by BrainySakura
University of South Australia
Alexia Jones
Tags
Related
- Week 1 - Personality Intro Lecture PDF
- Week 2 - Individual Differences PDF
- PS2050: Personality and Individual Differences Introduction Lecture (1) PDF
- Royal Holloway PS2050: Personality and Individual Differences Introduction Lecture PDF
- PSYU2234 Social & Personality Psych Lecture Notes PDF
- Domains of Knowledge about Human Nature Lesson 3 PDF
Summary
This document covers individual differences in personality psychology, specifically looking at measurement issues and personality development. It discusses concepts like social desirability, carelessness responding, and faking on questionnaires. It also examines personality development and stability across different aspects of life.
Full Transcript
lOMoARcPSD|28762649 Week 3 - Individual differences p2 Personality Psychology (University of South Australia) Scan to open on Studocu Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university Downloade...
lOMoARcPSD|28762649 Week 3 - Individual differences p2 Personality Psychology (University of South Australia) Scan to open on Studocu Studocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university Downloaded by Alexia Jones ([email protected]) lOMoARcPSD|28762649 Week 3- Personality Psychology - Social desirability: tendency to answer - INTERNAL: changes are internal to a Individual items in such a way so that one comes person- not changes in the external across as socially attractive or likable environment differences p2 measuring and statistically removing/ designing surveys that are susceptible to - ENDURING: changes are enduring over time- not temporary social desirability/ using a forced choice MEASUREMENT ISSUES format. - Reliance on self-report DIFFERENT TYPES OF STABILITY ‘- how much’ of a trait does someone have? PERSONALITY AND PREDICTION POPULATION LEVEL: changes or constancies that CARELESS RESPONDING: Academic success may be associated with apply more or less to every one (sex/driving/crime) - infrequency scales: items that few people personality (conscientiousness) GROUP LEVEL: changes or constancies that affect ever answer NOFTLE & ROBINS different groups differently (body image concerns, - Duplicate items: spaced far apart in the - Four different samples risk taking) survey - Measures of personality: BFI, NEO-FFI, INDIVIDUAL LEVEL?: can we predict later FAKING ON QUESTIONNAIRES: HEXACO-PI, NEO-PI-R psychological disturbance from earlier measures of - Faking good: attempting to appear better - Measures of academic achievement: SAT personality? Predictions that can be made from off or better adjusted than one actually is score, GPA personality traits aren’t conclusive, lots more - Faking bad: attempting to appear worse off - Self-perceived IQ and academic ability variability than predictability or less adjusted than one actually is. - Self-reports of academic effort HOW TO MEASURE FAKING - Results: consciousness and openness STABILITY OF PERSONALITY OVER TIME DISCLOSURE INDEX: whether client was inclined to biggest predictors of SAT scores and GPA INFANCY: for most temperament variables there are be frank and self-revealing or reticent and secretive Myer Briggs good example of what not to use- puts moderate levels of stability during the first year of DESIRABILITY INDEX: degree to which the results people in boxes that don’t tell us THAT much life. Emotionally driven. may have been affected by client’s inclination to CHILDHOOD: activity level appear socially attractive, morally virtuous or PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT (smiling/laughing/fear) /aggression (some level of emotionally well reserved Continuities, consistencies, stabilities in people over predictability) DEBASEMENT INDEX: tendency to deprecate or time // the way in which people change over time ADULTHOOD: devalue oneself by presenting more troublesome Three key forms of stability - Rank order stability: found across multiple emotional and personal difficulties that are likely to - RANK ORDER: maintenance of an measures with multiple investigators// uncovered upon objective review individual’s position within a group found from observer reports// more set in RESPONSE SETS: - MEAN LEVEL: constancy of level in stone the older you get// moderate to high - Acquiescence: tendency to agree with population levels of stability in adulthood- turning items, regardless of content reverse - PERSONAL COHERENCE: maintaining rank behaviours into habits- habitually produce scoring order relative to others, but changing behaviours because they’re comfortable- - Extreme responding: tendency to give manifestations of the trait. thought to reflect your personality endpoint responses Personality change - Mean level stability: average levels of the big 5 mostly stable over time Downloaded by Alexia Jones ([email protected]) lOMoARcPSD|28762649 Week 3- Personality Psychology - PERSONALITY CHANGE Changes in self-esteem from adolescence to adulthood - Sex differences adolescent adulthood. Females decrease, males increase Autonomy, leadership, dominance and ambition increase over time Flexibility and impulsivity: decrease over lifespan Sensation seeking increases from childhood adolescence, falls continuously after 20s Femininity: drop from early 40s to 50s, pressure to look a certain way decreases as you get older Competence: SELF PERCIEVED women increase, men stable Independence and traditional roles: general increase Changes in time across cohorts - Increase in narcissism: western culture - Self sufficiency: more access to info and opportunities - Education - Assertiveness COHERENCE OVER TIME Predictable changes in manifestations or outcomes of personality factors over time, even if underlying characteristics remain stable Downloaded by Alexia Jones ([email protected])