🎧 New: AI-Generated Podcasts Turn your study notes into engaging audio conversations. Learn more

Teamwork and Collaboration.pdf

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Full Transcript

Teamwork and Collaboration 01 February 2024 10:00 Main Ideas Notes Notes Notes Summaries of Studies on Collaboration from "Teamwork and Collaboration" Definition and Evolution of Collaboration Collaboration = Coordinated actions of individuals leading to mutual benefits. Evolutionary Perspective: â—‹...

Teamwork and Collaboration 01 February 2024 10:00 Main Ideas Notes Notes Notes Summaries of Studies on Collaboration from "Teamwork and Collaboration" Definition and Evolution of Collaboration Collaboration = Coordinated actions of individuals leading to mutual benefits. Evolutionary Perspective: â—‹ Ancestral link to chimpanzees and bonobos, indicating evolutionary roots in collaboration. â—‹ Chimpanzees exhibit behaviors like alliances, coalitionary support, group hunting, and meat sharing. Ingredients for Effective Collaboration Socio-cognitive Skills = Essential for collaboration, including joint attention, shared goals, communication skills, and planning, leading to effective coordination. Motivation and Non-Cognitive Factors = Influence the willingness to collaborate. Resource Distribution Mechanisms = Ensure fair sharing of benefits and resources. Categories of Collaborative Behavior Proximate Mechanisms: â—‹ Independent decision-making influenced by external events (By-product collaboration). â—‹ Socially influenced and actively coordinated collaboration. Advanced Collaboration = Based on shared intentionality, including understanding of partner's role and mutual awareness of goals. Strategies and Constraints in Collaboration Strategies for Facilitation = Includes waiting for/recruiting partners, helping partners, communication, and sharing spoils. Chimpanzee Studies: â—‹ Preference for competent partners. â—‹ Instrumental help provided in specific tasks. Constraints = Tolerance levels (i.e., tendency to share with others) impact collaborative capability. Human-Chimpanzee Comparison Children's Collaboration: â—‹ Tendency to share more equally post-collaboration. â—‹ Development of turn-taking strategies from ages 3.5 to 5 years. Chimpanzees: â—‹ Capable of cooperation but struggle with turn-taking. â—‹ Collaboration influenced by reward benefits. Conclusions Collaboration in Chimpanzees and Humans: Both species exhibit collaborative behaviors, but humans show more advanced sharing and turn -taking abilities. Importance of Collaboration: Essential for evolutionary survival and societal functioning. 1. Bullinger, Melis & Tomasello (2011); Warneken, Lohse, Melis, & Tomasello (2011); â—‹ Study Focus: Equal sharing in chimpanzees and humans. â—‹ Findings: â–ª Chimpanzees showed a preference for working alone, but chose to collaborate for higher benefits. â–ª Human children tended to share more equally (2:2) in clumped conditions. 2. Melis, Altrichter, & Tomasello (2013) â—‹ Study Focus: Allocation of resources to collaborators and free-riders in 3-year-olds. â—‹ Findings: Young children shared the spoils more equitably after collaboration. 3. Melis, Hare, & Tomasello (2006b); Melis & Tomasello (2013) â—‹ Study Focus: Instrumental help in collaboration among chimpanzees. â—‹ Findings: â–ª In a grape raking task, most subjects passed the correct tool to their partners, indicating understanding of the partner's role in collaboration. 4. Hamann, Warneken, Greenberg, & Tomasello (2011); Melis, Grocke, Kalbitz, & Tomasello (2016) â—‹ Study Focus: Equal sharing in children and chimpanzees; turn-taking skills in humans. â—‹ Findings: â–ª Children, but not chimpanzees, encouraged equal sharing after collaboration. â–ª Humans exhibited unique turn-taking skills not found in chimpanzees. 5. Rekers, Haun, & Tomasello (2011); Melis, Hare, & Tomasello (2006a) â—‹ Study Focus: Preference for collaboration in children and chimpanzees. â—‹ Findings: â–ª Children showed a higher preference for collaboration compared to chimpanzees. â–ª Study on engineering cooperation in chimpanzees highlighted tolerance constraints on cooperation. 6. Melis, Schneider, & Tomasello (2011); Melis, Altrichter, & Tomasello (2013) â—‹ Study Focus: Sharing after collaboration. â—‹ Findings: â–ª Sharing was more fair post-collaboration. â–ª Proximity, but not collaboration, influenced sharing behavior. 7. Melis & Tomasello (2013) â—‹ Study Focus: Chimpanzees' tool transfer in a collaborative task. â—‹ Findings: â–ª Most subjects correctly chose the tool needed by their partner. â–ª The study indicates understanding of the partner's role in the task. 8. Melis, Hare, & Tomasello (2006b); Hare, Melis, Woods, Hastings, & Wrangham (2007) â—‹ Study Focus: Tolerance constraints in chimpanzees' collaboration. â—‹ Findings: â–ª Collaboration was hampered by low tolerance levels, particularly in situations with food. 9. Melis & Tomasello (2019) â—‹ Study Focus: Chimpanzees' communication in collaborative problem-solving. â—‹ Findings: â–ª Chimpanzees displayed the ability to wait for and recruit competent partners. â–ª They communicated effectively, indicating an understanding of the partner's instrumental role. 10. Melis, Grocke, Kalbitz, & Tomasello (2016) â—‹ Study Focus: Turn-taking in collaboration. â—‹ Findings: â–ª The study examined when children start using turn-taking as a strategy to share resources. â–ª It showed that successful cooperation was present but decreased over sessions; turn-taking did not emerge significantly. Summary PSYC0010 Social Psychology Page 1 Hypotheses: Co-Production vs. Collaboration: Differentiates between simple joint activities and complex collaborations. Proximate Mechanisms of Collaboration: Classifies collaboration based on coordination and shared intentionality. Cognition in Collaboration: How cognitive abilities support collaboration, including partner recruitment and communication. Tolerance Constraints: The role of tolerance in successful collaboration, especially around food. Sharing after Collaboration: How collaboration influences resource sharing, focusing on equity and turn-taking. Sharing-under-pressure Hypothesis: Suggests that sharing is influenced by social pressure, where more harassment leads to more sharing, mainly in the context of food sharing. PSYC0010 Social Psychology Page 2 Notes PSYC0010 Social Psychology Page 3 Notes Notes PSYC0010 Social Psychology Page 4 PSYC0010 Social Psychology Page 5

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser