Group Processes Psychology PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by AwedChupacabra
Tags
Summary
This document is a chapter on group processes in social psychology, covering topics like social facilitation, evaluation apprehension, distraction-conflict explanation, social loafing and deindividuation. It also discusses the group polarization phenomenon in the context of making decisions and how such decisions can become more extreme.
Full Transcript
GROUP PROCESSES + CHAPTER 9 What is a group? - Two or more people - Interact with and influence each other - Perceive one another as “us” Social facilitation: what is it? How does it occur? 3 possible explanations - Performing tasks in the presence of others–do we do better or worse?...
GROUP PROCESSES + CHAPTER 9 What is a group? - Two or more people - Interact with and influence each other - Perceive one another as “us” Social facilitation: what is it? How does it occur? 3 possible explanations - Performing tasks in the presence of others–do we do better or worse? - Allport–when others were present, one’s performance was enhanced - But sometimes performance is worse? Why? - Zajonc’s Mere Presence Explanation - Mere presence of others is enough to produce social facilitation effect because it increases arousal - Arousal enhances whatever response tendency is dominant - Dominant responses are responses that are most likely to occur in a given situation - Evaluation Apprehension Explanation - Arousal is result of evaluation apprehension - Presence of others makes us concerned about being judged–leading to arousal - Increased self-focus reminds people that they can fail and therefore motivates them - Others must be position to evaluate us - Blindfolded audience does not produce social facilitation - Distraction-conflict explanation - Arousal is a result of conflict between attending to audiences vs. focusing on the task - The conflict creates arousal that in turn influences task performance - It can explain task enhancement occur in both human and nonhuman - Others can affect our performance by just be there- makes us more alert - By distracting us Social loafing: what is it? Why does it occur? How to prevent it? - When presence of others makes you perform worse - Reduction in motivation and effort when individual work collectively in a group (compared with whey they work alone) - Latane’ et al. (1979)- shouting study - Had male students separate into rooms with headphones - Asked to clap or shout as loudly as possible - Led to believe that they were shouting alone or in groups of 2, 4, 6 persons - Result: as group sizes increased, amount of noise produced by individual participant dropped - Social loafing- - Is also found in cognitive task - Occurs in both individuals and collectivist societies, but the former is stronger - Appears in both genders, with women are slightly less likely - We feel less personally responsible for task outcome, leading to diffusion of responsibility - How to reduce it then? Deindividuation: what creates this loss of sense of individuality? - Loss of a person’s sense of individuality and the reduction of normal constraints against deviant behavior when people are in a crowd - Personal identity and values are replaced by those of the group - Increased by anonymity - Increased by loss of self awareness - Can lead to social contagion - Mob and group aggression - Trick or treat study - Children trick or treated alone or in group - Half of trick or treating children were asked name, other half were not - Then all were given chance to steal extra candy from a bowl Group polarization: going to extremes - Tendency for group members to make decision that is more extreme than their initial inclinations - Myers & bishop’s (1970) racial attitude study - High school students were measured level of prejudice - Then were separated into 3 types: high, medium, and low prejudice groups - Discussed with like-minded peers in group on racial issues - Informational influence - Normative influence - Commitment to one’s view after publicly expressing it Groupthink: Causes, symptoms, characteristics - Excessive tendency to seek concurrence among group member - Maintaining group cohesiveness and solidarity is more important than critical analysis - What causes it? - How can it be prevented? - Be sure to read historical examples in the text Group cohesiveness (textbook) Note: Topics of leadership, conflict & cooperation of Chapter 9 on Group will NOT be tested in the exam. Class demonstration on social loafing-what it shows? Class demonstration on deindividuation – what we did and what did we find?