Midterm 1 Prep 2 PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by NonViolentBegonia5014
University of British Columbia
Tags
Summary
This document explores social psychology concepts like trust, competition, and group dynamics. It touches on social learning theory, where individuals learn by observing and imitating others, and social identity theory, which examines the development of positive group attitudes.
Full Transcript
I dimensions of forming impressions...
I dimensions of forming impressions ① How Trustworthy they fee ② Level of compete we observe social learning theory = kids learn by watching , adult & does something , kid is likely to replicate unless adult gets punished - behaviours , dispositions - our cognitions - , are shaped by observing and imitating others social idutity theory Why we develop more positive realistic conflict theory = group attitudes towards our own ingroups negative intergroup attitudes diffusion = of responsibility · in develop when Y group thinking somene compete = groups a , against & each other core motivations underlying 2 of attitudes action : types ① needing to implicit > unconscious , - belong learned through exposure ② percieving group & self positively explicit > conscious - ③Merstanding ! Powe Se tre affect Heuristics? T Social I types those kin selection = helping ① Transferance & (applying schemes the of - with whom we share other ppl we already know & correct info - M same genetics ⑧ False concensus /Assumption that - Desire to behave correctly ppl are like us Pro-social behavior norm of reciprocity actions aimeda = towards = helpingpeoplewhol as continuum of social influence - 3 levels : norms, requests, orders O = conform or independent be assertive ② = comply or ③ Obey or defy Attractiveness = - of face - symmetry elaboration likelihood · similar interests mode ( = Theory of persuasion - wealth of mate that statsattituda routes andconformata we ①central ⑧peripheral looseour individuaaa more of group wh norms Social impact theory when we should expect - to see normative influence -normative influence moderators normative social influence = Agreeing W a group whi 3 factors everyone has the same opinion, (not physical but not necessarily believing i t 1 proximity 2 Unanimaty (number ( gain approval -. (valve of membership). 3 Strength Dealing w/ Situations ① Affective feeling (of situation ② Cognitive Belief lab + characteristics of sit). - ③ Behavioural Motivations (to approach sitf. · avoid or Dealing wh dissonance ① change attitude change behaviour ③reframe behaviourjustify (consonant condition control ③ Reduce perceived - · now to respond 6 factors that shape how masculinity agency = we view others - ① Personality ④ Stereotypes ② Error ⑤ Opinion ③ Residual determinism ⑥ Norms Reciprocal lead to = how our preferences those Choicesthatlead orad t SocialCog. approach berr a personalityisbased on - - Adaptable and flexible ? situationi s Sex linked hormones change Measuritbyputing - pin = Mosta or non-reinforced depending on forad culture I classes of personality ① Traits ① physical characteristics & takets ② states moods ③ Evaluative judgements Stypes of personality · to m traits according * Laport &S traits allportmetal : overbearing I & Q Chameleon affect behaviours Think m minicing ppls - in order to fit in and better understand ppl self efficacy will do this action = I Therefor I will get outcome the desired & ② C Affective forecasting -inability toforcasts emotional error contributions of Why self justification ? psycoanalysis wewanttoscoursesaa trait to describe a ① Repression ⑤ identification reluctant 1 Discovering unconscious to depend. already exists Regressioation sublimation. Talk 2 Therapy ⑪ProjectionReaction formation. 3 Mind-Body connection ⑤ Displacement 4. Child development effects 1 personality functional equivalence - How dif personalities act in dif situations What are defuse mechanisms the / conflict - various ways ego copes anxious ambivalent betwee ID and Superego = passionate but prom to jealousy what is personality ? = patterns of thoughts behaviours that make up a person Steps of theory-data cycle ① Theory ④ Preregistration ② Research question ⑤ Data As ③ Research design validity internal =no Confora other factor analysis explanation a se Makinglargestarts a =canit suppor & in one another Descriptive stats batch Summarize & a C = of scores inferential stats =Whetherresu relationship e in a popolation validity in a study of conclusion -accuracy a Prov avariab & Research or descision A noalternativeexplanation is C↑ ③ variables must be correlated Descriptive research - = goal is to describe what is typical by measuring one variable ② a time oration e variables between Card ethical principles Bjustice - not conducted disproportionately on our group Scientific method processofbasingabeliethra = experimental research Manipulating One variable to - prov a causal claim and relationship between two understand variables Structuralism us Functionalism ↓ Ohabrinancial how = Bioneuroscience pers. Biological underpinnings of we think , act, and Developme patterns benave & works of our brain How what part ① = Bio-neuroscience perspectiveisorders? gemticafort a = Emotional perspective ·n to feel, Personalityperspective = How human capacity toexorhowbehari as =wanting Positive psycology -what makes and keeps - and situation Intro - S myg Cultural perspective =investigateshow Culturacont in Philisophical empiricism : Behaviourism (ppl are not born wr innate slates desires or predispositions (Blank slates) Structuralism structure of consciousness - con be understood by analyzing basic elements of thoughts and susations Chomsky conclusion : -natavism is required Founderstandpsystos ↳Bornwigteriu Functionalism cog perspective in the - How processes affect behaviour a Mentalprocessesthatund Drain aa viewwindafaction - ent more Me ultra - Tried to delete' wrong info from ppls brains - - Behaviourism - ppl became temporarily sucseptible to new ideas applying Milgrams findings ① critique authority (dissat ② Remind ppl authority figures are human (delegitimize ③ authority Studies Reduce distance btwn victims & between authorities ⑪ Permit disagreement ↳ - conclusion of Study : personality changes milgrams on Situation we - Obedie is stronger than think avoid atrocity - we can help by better understanding Obedie