Social Learning Theory PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by ExtraordinaryChicago
Loyola University Chicago
Tags
Summary
This document is a chapter on Social Learning Theory from a course in criminal justice and criminology at Loyola University Chicago. It explains concepts such as differential association, definitions, differential reinforcement, and imitation in relation to learning behavior. The theory's application to understanding deviancy and conventional behavior is also discussed.
Full Transcript
Social Learning Theory Chapter 5 DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE & CRIMINOLOGY Social Learning Theory Ron Akers Professor Emeritus, University of Florida Sutherland Award (1988), American Society of Criminology It’s the guy from your textbook!...
Social Learning Theory Chapter 5 DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE & CRIMINOLOGY Social Learning Theory Ron Akers Professor Emeritus, University of Florida Sutherland Award (1988), American Society of Criminology It’s the guy from your textbook! 1973 1992 1998 1994/2021 Social Learning Theory Akers (1973; 1998 + Burgess & Akers, 1966) Revised differential association theory (Sutherland, 1947) Reduced to 7 propositions [from Sutherland’s “9 Principles” (1947)] Merged: (1) Criminal behavior is learned (8) through same mechanisms & process of all learned behavior Dropped: (9) Criminal behavior is an expression of general needs & values ↑Specifica on of learning process “Incorporated social psychology” (Bandura, 1969; 1977; Skinner, 1953; 1959) Reinforcement through conditioning Operant [or Instrumental] vs. Classical [or Pavlovian] LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Social Learning Theory Reinforcement through conditioning Operant [or Instrumental] vs. Classical [or Pavlovian] Arranged relationship between Arranged relationship between response & stimulus (or reinforcer) two stimuli (or reinforcers) B. F. Skinner’s rats Pavlov’s dogs Press lever (response) food (stimuli or Tone (stimuli #1) food (#2) reinforcer) ∴ Tone salivation Social Learning Theory Akers (1973; 1998 + Burgess & Akers, 1966) All behavior – conventional & deviant – is learned Learning occurs in “intimate group setting” Childhood vs. adolescence & young adulthood 4 Concepts Differential association (Akers + Sutherland, 1947) Definitions (Akers + Sutherland, 1947) Differential reinforcement (Akers) Imitation (Akers) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Social Learning Theory 4 Concepts (Akers, 1973; 1998 + Burgess & Akers, 1966) Differential association (Sutherland, 1947) Learning occurs in “intimate (peer) group setting” Interactional dimension Direct association & interactions with others Primary & secondary groups* (i.e., family & peers) Indirect associa on & iden fica on with ↑distant groups Reference groups (i.e., school, church, & leisure/ recreational) *“Virtual peer groups” (i.e., social media) (*Warr, 2002) Symbolic groups (e.g., “Cubs win! We’re the world champions!”) Normative dimension Patterns of norms exposed to through associations Modalities of association (Sutherland, 1947) Frequency (i.e., how often), duration (i.e., amount of time), priority (i.e., early vs. later), & intensity (i.e., primary vs. distant) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Social Learning Theory 4 Concepts (Akers, 1973; 1998 + Burgess & Akers, 1966) Definitions (Sutherland, 1947) Beliefs, attitudes, & meanings attached to behavior Discriminative stimuli operate as cues or signals for a situation’s appropriate/ expected response Types General or Negative Definitions – conventional values/ beliefs, & attitudes (e.g., religious & moral) Harming others is wrong (i.e., stealing & violence) Specific Definitions Positive definitions – Beliefs/ attitudes that make behavior morally desirable It’s your patriotic duty to disobey unjust laws Neutralizing definitions – Beliefs/ attitudes that justify, rationalize, or excuse behavior Since smoking pot doesn’t hurt anyone, it isn’t wrong LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO