Measuring Crime PDF
Document Details
Tags
Summary
This presentation discusses various methods for measuring crime, such as official statistics, victimization surveys, and self-reported data. It explores the Uniform Crime Reports, National Incident-Based Reporting System, and the National Crime Victimization Survey, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in capturing the full scope of criminal activity. It also touches upon the role of self-report studies. The presentation concludes with discussion of the importance of considerations which influence the accuracy of these measurement approaches.
Full Transcript
Measuring Crime Agenda Quick review How can we learn about something people hide? Measuring Crime Using official data sources to address the narrowing gender-gap Small Scale Studies Measuring Crime and Criminal Behavior Most sources of crime data fit into the following categor...
Measuring Crime Agenda Quick review How can we learn about something people hide? Measuring Crime Using official data sources to address the narrowing gender-gap Small Scale Studies Measuring Crime and Criminal Behavior Most sources of crime data fit into the following categories: 1. Official Statistics UCR NIBRS 2. Victimization Survey Data NCVS 3. Self-Reported Data The Uniform Crime Reports The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) is the primary source of official crime statistics in the United States. The UCR: Is compiled by the FBI. Reflects information gathered from police and sheriff’s departments. Participation is voluntary, but most law enforcement agencies do participate. The Uniform Crime Reports Datafrom the UCR are divided into Part I and Part II offenses. Part I: “Index Crimes” Violent Crimes: Homicide, Assault, Forcible Rape, and Robbery Property Crimes: Larceny/Theft, Burglary, Motor Vehicle Theft, and Arson) Part II: Less Serious Offenses Vandalism, gambling, drunkenness, disorderly conduct, etc. The Uniform Crime Reports Problems with the UCR: ◦ It significantly under-represents the actual number of criminal events in the United States each year. ◦ Federal crimes (such as tax evasion) are not included. ◦ Not all jurisdictions participate. ◦ Some agencies keep more thorough records than others. ◦ Crime data may be falsified by police departments. ◦ The hierarchy rule requires police to report only the highest offense committed in a multiple-single incident. NIBRS The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) began in 1982, in order to collect more detailed and comprehensive crime statistics. NIBRS includes more information than the UCR about the circumstances of the offense and victim and offender characteristics. NIBRS collects data on 46 “Group A” offenses and 11 “Group B” offenses. There is no hierarchy rule under the NIBRS system. NIBRS Problems with NIBRS: It does not detect crimes that do not come to the attention of the police. The reporting process is so cumbersome that few agencies participate wanted to participate. This replaced the UCR in 2021. Crime Victimization Survey Data The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS): Is conducted by Census Bureau personnel on behalf of the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Reflects a representative sample of households—in 2015, interviews were conducted with 93,760 households (Truman and Morgan, 2016). This is where we get an estimate of how many crimes remain unreported to police. Crime Victimization Survey Data Problems with the NCVS: Cannot measure “victimless” crimes or murder. Does not include crimes against commercial enterprises. Victimization data do not have to meet legal standards. Crimes may be over-reported or under-reported due to dishonesty or memory lapses. Self-Reported Crime Surveys Self Report Surveys: Are good at uncovering the extent of minor offenses, such as drug use. Allow researchers to explore the relationship of criminal behavior to characteristics such as impulsiveness. Tend to use high school or college students for subjects, though prisoners and probationers/parolees have also been used. Self-Reported Crime Surveys Problems with Self-Report Surveys: Often rely on convenience samples. Fail to adequately measure serious crime. Susceptible to dishonesty of respondents. Buta good one is the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (not a convenience sample) Conclusions Which measure is the “best” will depend on what we want to know. The UCR is probably the “best” source of data for murder and serious crime, but is not helpful in determining rates of drug use. Victimization surveys cannot tell us about murder or drug use, but is a good source for rape statistics. Self-report surveys will provide the best information on drug use, but not serious crimes such as murder or rape. Measuring crime Design a research question in which your assigned data source would be best to use in trying to answer the question. Support your claim that this is the best data source to answer your question. Finally, what are the problems or limitations of this data source and how might these influence your results? Recap Sources for measuring crime The Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Self-Reported Crime Surveys National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) Other data sources National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Mortality System National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) public health data links across systems Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Gender Gap Trends for Violent Crimes, 1980 to 2003: A UCR-NCVS Comparison Darrell Steffensmeier, Hua Zhong, Jeff Ackerman, Jennifer Schwartz, and Suzanne Agha Gender Gap Trends for Violent Crimes The authors use UCR and NCVS data from 1980-2003 to explore whether female violent crime appears to be rising in comparison to male violent crime. ◦ There has been a recent narrowing of the gender gap for assault in official statistics. ◦ The study compared the UCR and NCVS statistics to study whether the narrowing gap was attributable to: Behavior Change – Women committing more violence. Policy Changes – Police responding to female violence differently. Gender Gap Trends for Violent Crimes It was determined that the narrowing gap can be attributed to changes in police practices, including: Increased criminalization/”charging up” by officers. An increasingly serious official stance toward domestic disputes, where women are more likely to engage in violence than in other contexts. Increasingly punitive attitudes toward females, and the increasingly gender-neutral nature of law enforcement. The ability to compare arrest data to victimization data was central to reaching this conclusion. Small Scale Studies