Criminal Law (Book I) 2024-2025 PDF

Document Details

StatuesqueSatire

Uploaded by StatuesqueSatire

Gapan City College

Tags

criminal law mala in se mala prohibita criminology

Summary

GAPAN CITY COLLEGE Criminal Law (Book I) course notes for the 1st semester of 2024-2025. The document compares and contrasts Mala In Se and Mala Prohibita crimes. It also discusses different legal classifications and defenses.

Full Transcript

**GAPAN CITY COLLEGE** **CRIMINAL LAW (BOOK I)** **1^st^ SEMESTER, A.Y. 2024-2025** **BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CRIMINOLOGY** **COURSE NOTES** **[A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES]** **1. MALA IN SE vs. MALA PROHIBITA** +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ |...

**GAPAN CITY COLLEGE** **CRIMINAL LAW (BOOK I)** **1^st^ SEMESTER, A.Y. 2024-2025** **BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CRIMINOLOGY** **COURSE NOTES** **[A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES]** **1. MALA IN SE vs. MALA PROHIBITA** +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | | **MALA IN SE** | **MALA PROHIBITA** | +=======================+=======================+=======================+ | **DEFINITION** | A crime or an act | An act that is | | | that is inherently | considered a | | | immoral, such as | | | | murder, arson, or | crime because it is | | | rape | prohibited by | | | | statute, although the | | | | act itself is not | | | | necessarily immoral | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | **AS TO LAWS | General Rule: RPC | General Rule: Special | | VIOLATED** | | Laws | | | Exception: A crime is | | | | mala in se, even if | Exception: Art. 220 | | | punishable under a | | | | special law, when the | (Technical | | | acts are inherently | Malversation) | | | immoral (e.g., | | | | plunder) | of RPC is malum | | | | prohibitum \[Ysidoro | | | \[Estrada v. | v. People, 685 SCRA | | | Sandiganbayan | 637 (2012)\] | | | | | | | , G.R. No. 148560 | | | | (2001); | | | | | | | | Garcia v. Court of | | | | Appeals, 484 SCRA 617 | | | | (2006)\] | | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | **AS TO USE OF GOOD | Valid defense | Not a | | FAITH AS A DEFENSE** | | | | | | valid defense | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | **AS TO CRIMINAL | Criminal intent | Criminal intent | | INTENT AS AN | | | | ELEMENT** | is necessary. | is not necessary | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | **AS TO DEGREE OF | Taken into account in | Not taken into | | ACCOMPLISHMENT** | determining the | account; the | | | penalty to be imposed | | | | | act is punishable | | | | only when consummated | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | **AS TO EFFECT OF | Taken into account in | Not taken into | | MITIGATING AND | determining the | account in | | AGGRAVATING | imposable penalty. | | | CIRCUMSTANCES** | | determining the | | | | imposable penalty, | | | | unless provided for | | | | by special law | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | **AS TO DEGREE OF | Degree of | Degree of | | PARTICIPATION | participation of | participation | | (presupposes more | | | | than 1 offender)** | each offender is | of each offender is | | | taken into | not | | | | | | | account. | taken into account | | | | and | | | | | | | | all who participated | | | | in the act are | | | | punished to the same | | | | extent | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | **AS TO DIVISION OF | Penalties may be | There is no such | | PENALTIES** | divided into degrees | division | | | and periods. | | | | | of penalties. | | | | | | | | Exception: | | | | | | | | When the special law | | | | uses the nomenclature | | | | of the penalties in | | | | the RPC | +-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+ **2. Scope and Characteristics** **a. Generality** +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | CRIME | JURISDICTION | +===================================+===================================+ | Crime is punishable under | The Philippines has exclusive | | Philippine laws, but not under US | jurisdiction | | laws | | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Crime is punishable under US | The US has exclusive | | laws, but not under Philippine | jurisdiction. | | laws | | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Crime is punishable under both US | The Philippines has primary but | | laws and Philippine laws | | | | concurrent jurisdiction with the | | | US. | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ **Who are Not Exempt** **Condition for Immunity to Apply** **b. Territoriality** **General Rule:** **Exceptions \[Art. 2, RPC\]:** **c. Prospectivity** **3. Ex Post Facto Law** **4. Pro Reo Principle** **5. Equipoise Doctrine** **[B. FELONIES]** **DEFINITION OF TERMS** **[1. CRIMINAL LIABILITIES AND FELONIES]** **[a. CLASSIFICATION OF FELONIES]** **2. According to Their Gravity \[Art. 9, RPC\]** **b. Less Grave Felonies** **2. Omission** **B. Mental Element (Mens Rea)** **1. DOLO** **Elements:** **Intent vs. Motive** +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | INTENT | MOTIVE | +===================================+===================================+ | The purpose is to use | The moving power | | | | | a particular means to | which impels one to | | | | | effect such a result. | action for a definite | | | | | | result. | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | An element of the | Not an element of the | | | | | crime, except in | crime. | | | | | unintentional felonies. | | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Essential in intentional | Essential only when the | | | | | felonies | identity of the | | | | | | perpetrator is in doubt. | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ **Mistake of Fact vs. Mistake of Law** +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | **MISTAKE OF FACT** | **MISTAKE OF LAW** | +===================================+===================================+ | ***AS TO DEFINITION*** | | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Misapprehension of fact on the | Want of knowledge or | | part of the person causing injury | | | to another. There is no criminal | acquaintance with the | | intent. \[U.S. v. Ah Chong, G.R. | | | No. L-5272 (1910)\] | laws of the land | | | | | | insofar as they apply | | | | | | to the act, relation, | | | | | | duty, or matter under | | | | | | consideration | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | ***AS TO DEFENSE OF GOOD FAITH*** | | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Good faith is a defense. | Good faith is not defense. | | | | | An honest mistake of fact | Ignorance of the law excuses no | | destroys the presumption of | one from compliance therewith | | criminal intent which arises upon | (ignorantia legis non excusat). | | the commission of a felonious | | | act. | | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ READ THESE TWO CASES!: **Requisites of Mistake of Fact as a Defense:** **2. CULPA** +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | **NEGLIGENCE** | **IMPRUDENCE** | +===================================+===================================+ | Deficiency of perception | Deficiency of action | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | A person fails to pay proper | A person fails to | | attention and to use due | | | diligence in foreseeing the | take the necessary | | injury or damage impending to be | | | caused | precaution to avoid | | | | | | injury to person or | | | | | | damage to property | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ **[d. IMPOSSIBLE CRIME]** Article 4. Criminal Liability -- Criminal liability shall be incurred: **DEFINITION OF TERMS** **[e. STAGES OF EXECUTION (Article 6)]** **1. ATTEMPTED** **OVERT ACT** [READ THESE TWO CASES!:] [1. Baleros Jr. vs. People, G.R. No. 138033 (2006)] [2. Rait vs. People, G.R. No. 180425 (2008)] **DESISTANCE** **2. FRUSTRATED** **DEFINITION** **Elements:** **3. CONSUMMATED** **DEFINITION** **[TWO (2) PHASES OF FELONY]** **2. Objective Phase** **[DEVELOPMENT OF A CRIME]**

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser