If you were to present the NHCP’s position on Limasawa Island to a skeptical audience, which evidence would you emphasize to support the argument?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking which evidence would best support the NHCP's position on Limasawa Island when presenting to a skeptical audience. It presents four options, each representing different perspectives on the importance of Limasawa's historical representation.
Answer
Geographical and topographical match with historical descriptions.
NHCP's position is supported by the geographical and topographical match of Limasawa with historical descriptions.
Answer for screen readers
NHCP's position is supported by the geographical and topographical match of Limasawa with historical descriptions.
More Information
The NHCP emphasizes strong evidence from geographical and historical analysis that match Limasawa with accounts of the first Mass.
Tips
Relying on opinions rather than factual geographical and historical analysis can weaken the argument.
Sources
- First Mass: Limasawa or Butuan? - coursehero.com
- The Site of the First Mass(Position Paper) - Studocu - studocu.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
