Analyze why a descriptive research design would be more suitable than an experimental design when studying people's attitudes towards climate change.
Understand the Problem
The question is asking to analyze why a descriptive research design is more suitable than an experimental design for studying people's attitudes towards climate change. It presents four options that offer different reasons for this preference.
Answer
Attitudes cannot be easily manipulated or controlled, so descriptive research allows for observation.
Attitudes cannot be easily manipulated or controlled, so descriptive research allows for observation.
Answer for screen readers
Attitudes cannot be easily manipulated or controlled, so descriptive research allows for observation.
More Information
Descriptive research is ideal for studying subjective phenomena like attitudes because it gathers information about what is currently happening without altering the conditions. This is crucial for understanding the naturally occurring nuances of people’s opinions on complex subjects like climate change.
Tips
A common mistake is assuming experimental research is always superior due to its hypothesis-testing capability, but for complex attitudes, descriptive research provides valuable insights.
Sources
- Descriptive vs experimental research - Voxco - voxco.com
- Descriptive Research | Introduction to Psychology - courses.lumenlearning.com
