Internal Validity Threats in Research
37 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What aspect does maturation primarily focus on in the context of group behavior changes?

  • Social interactions
  • Variations in group size
  • Random external influences
  • Spontaneous improvement (correct)
  • Which of the following describes the purpose of a comparison group in an experimental study?

  • To ensure all participants receive the treatment
  • To observe changes without the external factor (correct)
  • To increase the size of the experimental group
  • To guarantee diverse participant backgrounds
  • What can be inferred if a group shows improvement simply due to maturation?

  • The treatment was effective
  • External factors played a significant role
  • The experimental design was flawed
  • The improvement is due to natural development (correct)
  • How does history as a factor influence experimental outcomes?

    <p>It introduces external elements affecting most members</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why might air conditioning in November affect a comparison group's results?

    <p>It affects comfort levels differently than in September</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a primary internal validity threat discussed in the content?

    <p>Maturation threats</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What phenomenon can be specifically categorized as a maturation threat?

    <p>Spontaneous remission</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following changes helps reduce maturation threats in experiments?

    <p>Implementing a pretest/posttest design with multiple groups</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which internal validity threat could lead researchers to misinterpret improvements in an experiment?

    <p>Maturation threats</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of experimental design is suggested to avoid the issues associated with one-group designs?

    <p>True experimental design with comparison groups</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of these threats does NOT typically apply to one-group pretest/posttest designs?

    <p>Observer bias</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A researcher notes that a participant’s depressive symptoms decreased over time. What could be a possible explanation for this besides treatment?

    <p>Maturation effects</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a potential internal validity threat?

    <p>Random selection bias</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary purpose of using a comparison group in studies like those conducted by Nikhil and Dr. Yuki?

    <p>To control for potential maturation threats</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What would be an example of a history threat in the studies discussed?

    <p>The weather became colder, reducing the use of air conditioning</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the Go Green campaign study, what would indicate a history effect rather than an impact from the campaign itself?

    <p>Both the Go Green dorm and a comparison dorm reduced electricity usage similarly</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How can pretest/posttest design help in controlling for maturation and history threats?

    <p>By comparing changes over time between treatment and comparison groups</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of threat might arise if an external event coincides with the treatment, affecting participants' responses?

    <p>History threat</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of a history threat?

    <p>It impacts only a few individuals in the treatment group</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of the studies described, what primary benefit does a comparison group provide?

    <p>Resolving ambiguities about causes of change in treatment groups</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why might the low-sugar diet not be the sole explanation for the campers' improved behavior?

    <p>The campers attended a challenging swimming course simultaneously</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a primary method to prevent instrumentation threats in research?

    <p>Establishing clear coding manuals</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes an instrumentation threat?

    <p>The measuring instrument changes between tests</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a posttest-only design, how is the behavior of participants measured?

    <p>Only once after the intervention</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What can result in a selection-history threat during a study?

    <p>An outside event impacts only one group</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why might selection-attrition threaten the validity of an experiment?

    <p>Only one group experiences participant dropouts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How can Dr. Yuki control for different test forms during her experiment?

    <p>Counterbalancing the versions of the tests</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement differentiates between testing threats and instrumentation threats?

    <p>Testing threats arise from the previous testing experience of participants.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What might be an effect of a comparison group undergoing construction during a study?

    <p>It could lead to unexpected outcomes in participant reactions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is regression to the mean typically observed in an experimental group with extreme pretest scores?

    <p>Scores are likely to improve or revert closer to average.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does attrition affect the observed results in an experimental study?

    <p>It systematically skews the average by excluding dropouts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What aspect of an experimental design is critical for validating outcomes under extreme conditions?

    <p>Comparing with a group that was equally extreme but did not participate in therapy.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a likely outcome if the most extreme cases in an experiment drop out?

    <p>The overall mean will become less extreme.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In an experiment assessing the GRE verbal scores, what would indicate an order effect?

    <p>Improvements in scores related to the timing of the tests.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What characteristic of random events is essential for understanding regression to the mean?

    <p>They do not replicate the same effect at posttest.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens when researchers compute scores only including final samples in their analysis?

    <p>The analysis may exaggerate the effectiveness of the treatment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a scenario where participation leads to positive outcomes, what is a key consideration for the researchers?

    <p>Are participants who volunteer for therapy representative of the general population?</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Internal Validity Threats

    • Maturation threats: Changes in behavior occur over time naturally, not due to the intervention.

      • Example: Campers' behavior improves due to settling in, not the low-sugar diet.
      • Prevention: Use a comparison group with similar characteristics that do not receive the intervention.
    • History threats: An external event affects the treatment group, making it unclear if the change is due to the intervention or the event.

      • Example: Dorm residents reduce electricity usage due to cooler weather, not a Go Green campaign.
      • Prevention: Use a comparison group that does not receive the treatment, but experiences the same external event.
    • Regression threats: Extreme scores tend to regress towards the mean on subsequent measurements.

      • Example: A group with very low scores at pretest may improve simply due to regression towards the mean, not the intervention.
      • Prevention: Use a comparison group that started with similar extreme scores but didn't receive the intervention.
    • Attrition threats: Participants drop out of the study, potentially affecting the results.

      • Example: Participants in a depression therapy study drop out, leading to an unclear conclusion on the effectiveness of the intervention.
      • Prevention: Use a comparison group, and ensure that the dropouts are similar in both groups.
    • Testing threats: Repeated testing can influence participants' scores at posttest, making it unclear if the change is due to the intervention or familiarity with the test.

      • Example: Students taking a GRE verbal test may perform better at posttest due to familiarity with the test, not the intervention.
      • Prevention: Use a comparison group taking the same tests, or use a post-test only design.
    • Instrumentation threats: Changes in the measuring instrument itself can lead to differences in posttest scores.

      • Example: Different forms of a test might have varying difficulty levels, influencing the results.
      • Prevention: Use the same instrument for both pretest and posttest, or counterbalance the forms.
    • Combined threats: Selection threats can combine with history or attrition threats.

      • Example: One dorm has access to construction equipment, impacting electricity usage, making it unclear if it's due to the Go Green campaign or the equipment.
      • Prevention: Ensure groups are similar in terms of potential confounding variables, such as access to external events or participant characteristics.

    Other Threats

    • Observer bias: Researchers' expectations may influence their observations.
    • Demand characteristics: Participants may change their behavior based on their perception of the study's purpose.
    • Placebo effects: Participants may experience real effects due to their belief in the intervention, even if the intervention is not effective.

    Key Takeaways

    • One-group, pretest/posttest designs are vulnerable to several internal validity threats.
    • True pretest/posttest designs (with at least two groups) can help control for many internal validity threats.
    • Using comparison groups is crucial to rule out alternative explanations and measure the true effectiveness of the intervention.
    • Understanding and addressing these threats are crucial for ensuring the validity and reliability of research findings.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the various threats to internal validity in research, including maturation, history, and regression threats. This quiz will help you identify examples and prevention strategies to mitigate these threats in experimental designs. Test your understanding of how external factors can influence research outcomes.

    More Like This

    Experiment Reliability and Validity Quiz
    11 questions
    Quasi-Experiment Overview and Analysis
    8 questions
    Quasi Experiments Overview
    17 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser