🎧 New: AI-Generated Podcasts Turn your study notes into engaging audio conversations. Learn more

The Conviction of Mary M PDF

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Summary

This essay analyzes the potential conviction of Mary Melony for the murder of her husband. It examines the evidence presented, including Mary's lack of remorse and her attempts to manipulate the investigation. The essay explores the potential consequences of her actions and whether she should be convicted.

Full Transcript

The Conviction of Mary M (Question) Why should Mary be convicted of her crime? Mary should be convicted of her crimes. (Thesis) Mary Melony should be convicted for the murder of her husband, Patrick. (Engagement) In this essay, we will explore the reasons for her conviction, examining how an...

The Conviction of Mary M (Question) Why should Mary be convicted of her crime? Mary should be convicted of her crimes. (Thesis) Mary Melony should be convicted for the murder of her husband, Patrick. (Engagement) In this essay, we will explore the reasons for her conviction, examining how and why Mary killed her husband, the possibility that she might kill again, and the potential consequences she could face if caught. (Argument Point) Mary Melony killed her husband, Patrick, by striking him in the head with a frozen leg of lamb. She should be convicted because this act is clearly “murder.” (Proof) The author of "Lamb to the Slaughter" confirms that she killed him because in the text it says, “I’ve killed him.” (Link) This admission indicates her acknowledgment of the crime. Not only did the author provide us with well-written facts, but Mary also displayed no remorse; she smiled and giggled after committing the act. (Proof) This lack of remorse illustrates her emotional detachment. After killing Patrick, she disposed of the murder weapon by feeding it to the investigators, demonstrating her understanding of the gravity of her crime.(Transition) Furthermore, let's examine why Mary might kill again. (Argument Point) Mary Melony might kill again. (AP) In the text, she expresses a belief that she could get away with murder after successfully committing it the first time. (Proof) Following Patrick’s death, her confidence soared, making her feel invincible. (Link) This sense of invulnerability is concerning. (Proof) When investigators searched her home, they found no evidence linking her to the murder. (Example) After Mary killed Patrick, the police concluded that a man had committed the murder with a silver blade, completely overlooking her involvement. (Transition) The evidence doesn't end here; let's delve into why Mary could face another 14 years in prison if caught. (Argument Point) Mary Melony could also face another 14 years initially due to perjury. (AP) What is perjury? Perjury is a crime committed when someone lies or keeps the truth hidden after a murder. (Proof) Mary killed Patrick and did not confess. (Link) She never came forward to tell the truth. (Proof) Instead, she giggled and smiled, showing no intention of coming clean. If caught, Mary will face severe consequences for both the murder and her deception. (Conclusion) Moreover, Mary's manipulation of the investigation complicates her understanding of the law. This clever tactic not only highlights her intelligence but also indicates her effort to deceive the authorities. Mary clearly understands the potential consequences of her actions. (Clincher) After reading this essay, what do you think? Should Mary Melony be convicted

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser