Rizal Law Reviewer PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by Deleted User
Tags
Summary
This document provides a review of the Rizal Law, Republic Act No. 1425, in the Philippines. It details the law's objectives, background, and controversy surrounding its enactment. The document also examines the legislative process, provisions, and other related issues.
Full Transcript
Rizal Reviewer Introduction to Republic Act Number 1425 (Rizal Law) Republic Act Number 1425, commonly known as the Rizal Law, was authored by Senator Claro Recto and signed into law by President Ramon Magsaysay on June 12, 1956....
Rizal Reviewer Introduction to Republic Act Number 1425 (Rizal Law) Republic Act Number 1425, commonly known as the Rizal Law, was authored by Senator Claro Recto and signed into law by President Ramon Magsaysay on June 12, 1956. s The law mandates the inclusion of a Rizal subject in all tertiary education courses, both in public and private institutions. s The Rizal Law aims to promote the study of the life, works, and writings of national hero José Rizal, particularly his novels "Noli Me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo". ss The enactment of the law was highly controversial, especially due to opposition from the Catholic Church. ss Objectives of the Rizal Law The primary goals include: Rededicating the lives of the youth to ideals of freedom and nationalism. ss Paying tribute to Rizal for his contributions to shaping Filipino character. ss Inspiring patriotism through the study of Rizal's works. ss Controversy Surrounding the Rizal Law The Rizal Bill was fiercely opposed by members of the legislative branch and the Catholic Church. ss The Church believed the novels ridicule Catholic doctrines and practices, arguing this violated freedom of religion. ss The Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) claimed that certain passages in Rizal's works were against Church teachings. sss Legislative Process and Key Amendments The legislation underwent intense debates, with key senators opposing the bill due to religious concerns. sss Amendments proposed included making the reading of the novels non- compulsory for elementary and secondary levels, with strict observance only at the college level. ss The final law was signed into action after adjustments that included provisions for translations into various dialects.ss Provisions of the Rizal Law Section 1 mandates all educational institutions incorporate Rizal's life and works in their curricula.ss Section 2 requires schools to maintain adequate copies of the original versions of "Noli Me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo" in their libraries. ss Section 3 promotes the translation of these works into English and other major Philippine dialects to enhance accessibility. ss An appropriation of 300,000 pesos was authorized for the implementation of the act. ss Conclusion The Rizal Law underscores the significance of understanding José Rizal's ideals and contributions to Filipino nationalism. ss It reflects a commitment to embed these principles within the educational system, fostering a sense of nationalism and patriotism among the youth. ss Republic Act No. 229 (RA 229) is another law related to José Rizal, enacted in the Philippines on June 9, 1948. It is closely connected to the observance of Rizal Day and the proper commemoration of Rizal's life and heroism. Key Provisions of RA 229: 1. Commemoration of Rizal Day: RA 229 prohibits cockfighting, horse racing, and jai-alai (a ball game) on Rizal Day, which is observed on December 30 every year, marking the anniversary of his execution in 1896. The law mandates that the day should be devoted to honoring Rizal and his contributions to the Philippine nation, rather than for recreational or gambling activities. 2. Raising of Funds for Rizal Memorials: The law also allows the raising of funds for the construction, maintenance, and preservation of Rizal memorials, like monuments, libraries, and schools. These efforts are meant to perpetuate the memory of Rizal's life and works. Connection to Rizal's Legacy: RA 229 complements Rizal's Law (RA 1425) by emphasizing the importance of Rizal Day and ensuring that it is observed with respect and solemnity. While RA 1425 focuses on the education and study of Rizal's works, RA 229 ensures that Rizal’s heroism is properly commemorated, reinforcing the values of patriotism and respect for national history. Memorandum Order No. 247, issued by President Fidel V. Ramos on December 26, 1994, is an executive directive that reinforces Republic Act No. 1425 (Rizal Law) and calls for its stricter implementation in educational institutions across the Philippines. Key Points of Memorandum Order No. 247: 1. Strict Compliance with Rizal Law (RA 1425): The order emphasizes that all schools, colleges, and universities must strictly follow the provisions of RA 1425, ensuring that the life, works, and writings of José Rizal, especially his novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, are included in their curricula. 2. Distribution of Rizal’s Works: It directs the Department of Education, Culture, and Sports (DECS) (now DepEd) and the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) to take necessary steps to distribute Rizal’s works and ensure that these materials are available in educational institutions. 3. Monitoring and Reporting: DECS, CHED, and the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) were tasked with submitting regular reports on how educational institutions are complying with the implementation of RA 1425. Purpose of the Memorandum: Memorandum Order No. 247 was issued to ensure that students across the country are given the opportunity to learn about and appreciate Rizal’s contributions to Philippine history, in line with the goal of promoting nationalism and patriotism. It addressed concerns that the teaching of Rizal’s works was being neglected or not fully enforced in some schools. This order reaffirmed the importance of Rizal's legacy and reinforced the obligation of schools to make his writings an essential part of their educational programs. Key Provisions of CHED Memorandum Order No. 3 (1995): 1. Inclusion of Rizal’s Life and Works in Curricula: o The memorandum mandates that all higher education institutions (colleges and universities) must include the study of José Rizal's life, works, and writings, particularly his novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, as part of their curriculum. o The subject is typically included in the General Education curriculum, where it is required for all students, regardless of their major or degree program. 2. Specific Course Requirements: o The memorandum ensures that the Rizal course should not only cover his biographical details but also delve into the historical, social, and political context of his time, analyzing the impact of his writings on the Filipino struggle for independence and national identity. o It emphasizes critical thinking and analysis of Rizal's ideas and values and how they remain relevant to modern-day Philippines. 3. Reading the Unabridged Versions of Rizal’s Novels: o It reiterates the requirement of reading unabridged versions of Rizal's novels, unless a student, due to religious reasons, requests an exemption, in line with the earlier provision in RA 1425. 4. Teacher Training and Instructional Materials: o The memorandum encourages the proper training of educators tasked with teaching the Rizal course and the use of appropriate instructional materials, which may include supplementary readings, lectures, discussions, and other resources that deepen the understanding of Rizal's contributions. Purpose of CHED Memorandum Order No. 3: The issuance of this memorandum aimed to standardize how Rizal’s life and works are taught in higher education institutions and ensure compliance with RA 1425. It seeks to promote national consciousness, patriotism, and appreciation for Philippine history through the study of Rizal’s writings, which played a crucial role in awakening the Filipino spirit of resistance against colonial rule. The order ensures that all schools not only teach Rizal but do so in a way that engages students critically, understanding the historical significance of his work in shaping Filipino identity.