Retraction_Controversy(3).pptx

“If Rizal retracted, he would GENUINE not have been executed. But he OR was executed, therefore, Rizal did not retract.” FORGED??? © 2 0 1 2 S H Y R A G A I L S U M A G U E ∞ g a i l s h y r a. t u m b l...

“If Rizal retracted, he would GENUINE not have been executed. But he OR was executed, therefore, Rizal did not retract.” FORGED??? © 2 0 1 2 S H Y R A G A I L S U M A G U E ∞ g a i l s h y r a. t u m b l r. c o m A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D.  Did I retract or not? A CONTROVERSIAL DOCUMENT THAT RETRACTS: WORDS WRITINGS PUBLICATIONS CONDUCT THAT HAS BEEN CONTRARY TO RIZAL’S CHARACTER AS A CHILD OF GOD.  A CONTROVERSIAL DOCUMENT THAT RETRACTS: ABOMINATES MASONRY AS AN ENEMY OF THE CHURCH WORDS WRITINGS MASONS: FORGED PUBLICATIONS RETRACTION CONDUCT CATHOLICS: GENUINE THAT HAS BEEN CONTRARY RETRACTION TO RIZAL’S CHARACTER AS A CHILD OF GOD.  The first text was o f published in La Voz Española and Diaro s de Manila on the very day of Rizal’s i o n execution, December 30, 1986 er s e V l ’ s Th Ri z a o n i The fourth text The second text t appeared in EL appeared in Imparcial on the day c FOUR VERSIONS after Rizal’s a execution. It is the r OF THE ALLEGED short formula of the Barcelona, Spain, on February 14, 1897, in the fortnightly t retraction. magazine La Juventud Re RETRACTION LETTER OF JOSE RIZAL The original text was discovered in the archdiocesan archives on May 18, 1935. 1. December 30, 1896. The first text was published in La Voz Española and diaro de Manila on the very day of Rizal’s execution, Dec. 30, 1896. 2. December 31, 1896. The second text appeared in El Imparcial on the day after Rizal’s execution. It is the short formula of the Retraction. 3. February 14, 1897. The third text appeared in Barcelona, Spain, on February 14, 1897, in the fortnightly magazine La Juventud. It came from an anonymous writer who revealed himself fourteen years later as Fr. Balaguer. 4. May 18, 1935. The alleged “original” text was discovered by Fr. Manuel Garcia, C.M. o May 18, 1935 in the archdiocesan archives after in disappeared for thirty-nine years from the afternoon of the day when Rizal was shot.  People who 1.Baron Fernandez, proved Eyewitness that Rizal 2.Manuel did not Morato’s retract “Expose”  New Evidences?  IF RIZAL RETRACTED, THE WOULD QUESTION OF HEROISM THAT MAKE HIM LESS OF A HERO?