Optimising Migraine Treatment PDF

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Document Details

CorrectJasper802

Uploaded by CorrectJasper802

University of the Immaculate Conception

Leda Marina Pomes, Martina Guglielmetti, Enrico Bertamino, Maurizio Simmaco, Marina Borro, Paolo Martelletti

Tags

migraine treatment personalized medicine drug-drug interactions pharmacogenomics

Summary

This review article discusses optimizing migraine treatment by considering drug-drug interactions and personalized approaches. The authors explore how genetic factors influence individual responses to anti-migraine medications and suggest that pharmacogenomics plays a crucial role in tailoring treatment plans. The study also highlights novel therapeutic perspectives, including the use of biotechnological drugs targeting CGRP in migraine management.

Full Transcript

Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1010-3 The Journal of Headache...

Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1010-3 The Journal of Headache and Pain REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access Optimising migraine treatment: from drug- drug interactions to personalized medicine Leda Marina Pomes1, Martina Guglielmetti2,3, Enrico Bertamino4, Maurizio Simmaco5,6, Marina Borro5,6 and Paolo Martelletti3,7* Abstract Migraine is the most disabling and expensive chronic disorders, the etiology of which is still not fully known. The neuronal systems, (glutammatergic, dopaminergic, serotoninergic and GABA-ergic) whose functionality is partly attributable to genetically determined factors, has been suggested to play an important role. The treatment of acute attacks and the prophylactic management of chronic forms include the use of different category of drugs, and it is demonstrated that not each subject has the same clinical answer to them. The reason of this is to be searched in different functional capacity and quantity of phase I enzymes (such as different isoforms of CYP P450), phase II enzymes (such as UDP-glucuronosyltransferases), receptors (such as OPRM1 for opioids) and transporters (such as ABCB1) involved in the metabolic destiny of each drug, all of these dictated by DNA and RNA variations. The general picture is further exacerbated by the need for polytherapies, often also to treat comorbidities, which may interfere with the pharmacological action of anti-migraine drugs. Personalized medicine has the objective of setting the optimal therapies in the light of the functional biochemical asset and of the comorbidities of the individual patient, in order to obtain the best clinical response. Novel therapeutic perspectives in migraine includes biotechnological drugs directed against molecules (such as CGRP and its receptor) that cause vasodilatation at the peripheral level of the meningeal blood vessels and reflex stimulation of the parasympathetic system. Drug-drug interactions and the possible competitive metabolic destiny should be studied by the application of pharmacogenomics in large scale. Drug-drug interactions and their possible competitive metabolic destiny should be studied by the application of pharmacogenomics in large scale. Keywords: Personalized medicine, Pharmacogenomic, Anti-migraine drugs, Polytherapies, Gepants, Ditans, CGRP monoclonal antibodies Introduction The disorder is more frequent in female (3,1 = F:M) According with World Health Report in 2001, migraine with a peak of prevalence between ages of 22 and 55 is the most disabling and expensive Chronic disorders years old. representing the major cause of non-fatal disease – Genetic factors have been implicated in many aspects related disability. of migraine: the aetiology, the tendency to become Migraine is a common disorder connoted by recurrent chronic, the sensitivity to pharmacological treatment. headache attacks with nausea, vomiting, hyper sensibility The last aspect offers the possibility to design personal- to light, sound and smell (defined as Migraine without ized treatments in order to achieve improved therapeutic aura, MO) and, in 25% of cases, neurological symptoms success. (defined as Migraine with aura, MA). Genetic roots of migraine * Correspondence: [email protected] Glutammatergic, dopaminergic, serotoninergic and 3 Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of GABA-ergic systems are implicated in the Migraine Sassari, Sassari, Italy Headache etiology. Genetic variations affecting expres- 7 Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy sion in terms of quality and quantity of proteins, en- Full list of author information is available at the end of the article zymes, receptors and channels belonging to these © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 2 of 12 systems have been widely described [5–7] and the gen- non-appropriate drugs, choosing an alternative medication etic component of the disease is estimate around a 50%. in the same pharmacological class. Linkage analysis and genome-wide association studies Moreover, in the next future it will be possible to de- (GWAS) have been conducted on patients with common sign new drugs targeted on a patient’s genetic trait. migraine. However, linkage analyses have minimal power By cross-referencing the data relating to each drug of detection when studying genetic bases of complex traits used in a politreated patient, it is possible to predict and multifactorial disease such migraine (not showing a drug-drug interactions using web-based knowledgebases. simple Mendelian pattern of transmission), and most re- The same interactions impact differently on the meta- sults proved to be “false” positive, failing to be replicated bolic destiny of each of the other drugs included in the in larger cohorts or being contradictory. Differently, therapy, so it is possible, in light of the patient’s genomic GWAS are based on genome-wide data mining on auto- profile, to optimize the therapeutic choices by entrusting matic array platforms in which hundreds of thousand treatment to drugs that do not interfere with each other SNPs are queried and showed a high power to detect and do not interfere with the profile of the patient in common variants related to migraine. Among these, question. some are involved specifically in the susceptibility to the Many drugs are metabolized by isoforms of Cyto- development of the pathology [8, 9], as polymorphisms in chrome P450, membrane-associated proteins in the the encoding endothelin type A receptor (EDNRA), meth- endoplasmic reticulum , and different studies show ylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MHTFR), endothelial ni- as they are particularly important in drugs used in mi- tric oxide synthase (NOS3), angiotensin-converting graine therapy. enzyme (ACE), β-2 transforming growth factor (TGFB2) Here we consider the most frequent pharmacological and its receptor (TGFB2R), neurogenic locus notch classes used in the treatment of migraine attacks such as homolog protein 3 (NOTCH3). NSAIDs, triptans and opioids, moreover we consider tricyc- Therapeutic failure could be traced back to the use of lic antidepressants most used in prophylactic therapy. drugs undergoing non-optimal metabolism in a specific patient. Treatment failure can in turn lead to overuse of NSAIDs acute medication, often without great results. Overuse of NSAIDs represent the most frequent drug’s class used acute medication is commonly identified as the most im- by migraine sufferers (with at first place Ketoprofen, portant risk factors for chronic headache (CH, group of used in 41% of cases in migraine attack). headaches occurring daily or almost daily) and a causa- This medications’ metabolism depends on the phase I tive factor for medications overuse headache (MOH) metabolic enzymes CYP P450, in particular CYP2C9 and. About the genetic liability of this last form of com- CYP2C8 and frequently on the phase II metabolic en- plication of migraine (MOH), such as for the common zyme UDP-glucuronosyltransferases [20, 21]. ones’, an involvement of some polymorphisms of 5HTT Among the SNPs indentified in the CYP2C9 gene, the (such as the 5-HTTLPR) [11, 12] has been hypothesized. *2 (rs1799853) and the *3 (rs1057910), coding for a Moreover, drug dependence has been associated to poly- change of amino-acid sequence, are those associated morphism in genes regulating monoaminergic transmis- with significant reductions of enzyme activity [22, 23]. sion. Approximately 35% of the human total CYP2C-encoded enzymes in the liver belong to the CYP2C8 subfamily Pharmacogenomics. Among the 16 allelic variants of CYP2C8, the *2, and The fact that only the 50% of migraine patients ad- *5 are clinically the most important , but also the *3 equately respond to acute and prophylaxis therapies sug- and the *4 are often detected, also if with different fre- gest that migraine patients react differently to given quencies between races. drugs. The patient’s response (efficacy and toxicity) In patients carriers of these variants a reduction in to a drug is affected by DNA and RNA variations in that therapeutic efficacy (by reducing metabolism or clear- patient, resulting in different rates of therapeutic effect ance), and an increase in dose-dependent adverse effects as in different risk of adverse events, also burdening the , are frequent, i.e. CYP2C8*3, CYP2C9*2, *3 and health expenses [15–17]. UGT2B7 coding for a low-activity enzyme are implicated The genomic characterization of the allelic variants car- in the hepatotoxic effects of Diclofenac [25, 27] [Fig. 1], ried by the patients allows identification of drug-interacting whereas the loss of function allele CYP2C9*3, is associ- proteins (metabolic enzymes, transporters, targets) with an ated to a reduction of celecoxib clearance compared to altered activity. Since alteration of the drug-protein interac- the wild type [Fig. 2]. tions can change both the pharmacokinetic and pharmaco- An example of the particular involvement of UGTs in dynamic profiles of the administered drug, recognition of the metabolism of some NSAIDs is represented by as- such alteration may be used to avoid administration of pirin. Aspirin is deacetylated to salicylic acid, which Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 3 of 12 Fig. 1 Diclofenac metabolic profile. In the left column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, one for each row; in the right column relationship between corresponding transporter or enzyme of the row and diclofenac: is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate, ‘Inh’ for inhibitor and ‘Ind’ for inducer. Enzymes CYP 2C9, CYP2C8 and UGT and transporter MRP2 (ABCC2) are rimmed to emphasize their importance in diclofenac’s metabolic destiny. Related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer Fig. 2 Celecoxib metabolic profile. In the left column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, one for each row; in the right column relationship between corresponding transporter or enzyme of the row and celecoxib: is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate and ‘Inh’ for inhibitor. Enzyme CYP 2C9 is rimmed to emphasize their importance in celecoxib’s metabolic destiny. Related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 4 of 12 forms two hippuric acids (salicyluric and gentisuric) and constitution and migraine drug response have been two glucuronides. Salicylic acid accounts for 20–60% of showed also by Christensen et al. the product while metabolites from glucuronidation are At support of the heterogeneity in hepatic metabolism, 1–42%. Glucuronidations is supported by different likely due to MAO-A and CYP1A2, in different studies UGT isoforms including 1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A7, 1A8, conducted on in migraine patients outside attacks, dur- 1A9, 1A10, 2B4, 2B15 AND 2B17. So, the reduction ing attack and in healthy volunteers significant of the activity of UGTs can produce a reduction of a inter-individual variability was observed in the measured great part of the metabolism of the aspirin [Fig. 3]. plasma levels of different triptans in different situations It is also important to underline that some of the ABC such as Cmax after oral administration of Sumatriptan members (like ABCC2 and ABCC3) drug transporters (metabolised by MAO-A), rather than 2 h after the can modulate the hepatobiliary and renal transport and administration of Zolmitriptan (metabolised by excretion, i.e. loss of function of these proteins can pro- CYP1A2 and MAO-A) [Fig. 4]. duce accumulation of reactive diclofenac glucuronides It is very interesting to cite the observations of Gentile producing the effect of acute toxicity [31, 32] [Fig. 1]. et al. taking studying the CYP1A2, and in particular of the * 1F; they observed a higher frequency of -163A al- Triptans lele in abuser than non-abusers of drugs, hypothesizing Triptans are used for acute treatment of migraine at- that the -163A allele was associated to a faster degrad- tacks, and their pharmacological action is based on the ation of the drug. stimulation of serotonin receptors. Some individual genetic traits have been associated Opioids with the variability in triptans response, as SNPs in- Treatment of chronic pain is in someone entrusted to volved in transduction signal via HT1B/1D (i.e. rs5443 use of opioids. in the gene coding the G protein β3 subunit ) and This pharmacological category is even more compli- SNPs in metabolic genes involved in triptans’ degrad- cated than the previous ones because, in addition to the ation (MAO-A and CYP1A2 and 3A4). in particular, aspects related to the enzymatic stations involved in the Schürks et al. described as in a German sample rs5443 metabolism (mainly CYP2D6), the responsiveness to the in heterozygosity (C825TC) had a positive predictive opioid’s category is also related to the expression of ded- value for triptans response of 0.82 and a negative one of icated mu receptors (OPRM1), which also present poly- 0.35. Additionally, the association between genetic morphic alleles with differential functionality. Fig. 3 Aspirin metabolic profile. In the left column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, one for each row; in the right column relationship between corresponding transporter or enzyme of the row and aspirin: is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate, ‘Inh’ for inhibitor and ‘Ind’ for inducer. Enzyme UGT is rimmed to emphasize their importance in aspirin’s metabolic destiny. Related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 5 of 12 Fig. 4 Sumatriptan and Zolmitriptan metabolic profile. From left to right, in the first column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes, one for each row; in the second and third columns relationship between corresponding enzyme of the row and Sumatriptan (second column) and Zolmitriptan (third column): is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate. Enzyme CYP1A2 is rimmed to emphasize their importance in these triptans’ metabolic destiny. Related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 impact on the me- more noradrenergic effect) and secondary amines (with tabolism of this category when subjects are poor meta- a more serotoninergic effect). bolizers and when are ultra-rapid metabolizers. I.e. By CYP2C19, tertiary amines are metabolized (de- Tramadol is a pro-drug metabolized by CYP2D6 in to methylation) in secondary amines, both secondary and its active metabolite O- desmethyltramadol [Fig. 5]. tertiary amines are metabolized to less active metabolites There are experimental studies that show how patients by CYP2D6 (hydroxylation), so it’s clear as CYP2C19 poor metabolizers had little clinical effect related to a impacts the ratio of tertiary amines to secondary amines serum concentration of the active metabolite of the plasma concentration, but its weight on overall drug lower drug compared to the dosage of tramadol admin- clearance is lower than CYP2D6 [Figs. 6,7,8]. istered, ultra-rapid metabolizers tend to reduced experi- It is easy to guess why often interindividual differences mental pain concurrently with a wise increase in serum of plasma concentration, which are reflected in different levels of the drug [38, 39]. incidence of side effect and treatment response, are reg- In conditions of normal expression of OPRM1, poor istered. These differences are associated with the highly metabolizer, not metabolizing drug, will not use it, so polymorphic CYP2D6 (more of 100 allelic variants and therapeutic effect will not be obtained. Ultra-rapid one sub-variants identified) and CYP2C19 (more of 30 allelic can obtained the effect but for considerably shorter variants and sub-variants identified). In both cases, eth- times than normal, leading to an increase in the number nic differences were observed in the distribution of allele of administrations and doses, this could fuel an addictive frequencies [41, 42]. So, knowing CYP2D6 e CYP2C19 mechanism towards the drug. genomic variants of a patients we could modify pharma- About the receptor, SNP identified in the region of cotherapy (type and dosage of TCAs) potentially im- OPRM1 leads to a substitution of aspartate for aspara- proving clinical outcomes and reducing the rate of gine, altering N-glycosilation of the receptor protein, this treatment’s failure. influence patients’ response to therapeutic effect of opi- There are documented cases of CYP2D6 ultrarapid pa- oids. Moreover, there are discordant opinions about the tients who received large doses of tricyclic to achieve tendency of subjects with OPRM1 rs1799971 to make a therapeutic concentrations exposing the patient himself higher use of opioids [40, 20]. to increased risks of adverse effects , likely in CYP2D6 poor patients in which a therapeutic dosage of Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) plasma concentrations was not proportionally raised Still used to treat depression, their main therapeutic use. In similar situation, in both cases, therapeutic drug is in pain management. TCAs are mixed serotonin and monitoring is strongly recommended. norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors distinguished accord- In patients CYP2C19 ultrarapid, by extrapolated phar- ing to the chemical structure in tertiary amines (with a macokinetic data, it could be said that they need Fig. 5 Tramadol metabolic profile. In the left column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, one for each row; in the right column relationship between corresponding transporter or enzyme of the row and tramadol: is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate and ‘Inh’ for inhibitor. Enzyme CYP2D6 is rimmed to emphasize its importance in tramadol’s metabolic destiny. Related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 6 of 12 Fig. 6 Metabolic destiny of secondary and tertiary amines. Tertiary amines trough a reaction of demethylation supported by CYP2C19 are metabolized in Secondary amines; both tertiary and secondary amines are metabolized in less active metabolites by a reaction of hydroxylation supported by CYP2D6 increased doses of tertiary amine , as well as poor down between each drug. In fact, it must be also consid- ones are expected to have an increase of plasma concen- ered how the risk of toxicity and inefficacy of a polyther- tration if given the same dose. apeutic regime is partly attributable to the mechanism Therefore, combination of traits different from exten- for which the pharmacological effect of a drug varies sive one, of both CYP and in the same patient could due to the simultaneous biological action of an add- produce additive pharmacokinetic effects in tricyclic’s itional drug on the metabolic stations used for the me- proprieties. tabolism of the first drug, but equally and with reversed roles applies to the second drug too: the efficacy or pos- Politherapy: the obstacles between DDI and the genetic sible toxicity of a pharmacological cocktail is partly at- trait tributable to the drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that are According with how until now explained and in consid- established between the various drugs in therapy. eration of the fact that, as reported by the studies of Fer- It’s clear that the more drugs are present into the thera- rari et al. , it’s common practice to treat migraine peutic regimen, the more DDIs need to be considered. with multiple types of medications, the limit of patient’s Therefore, it is evident that the multiple comorbidities genetic is compounded by interaction that can settle that frequently occur in specific subsets of patients with Fig. 7 Tertiary amines metabolic profile From left to right, in the first column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes, one for each row; in the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth columns relationship between corresponding enzyme of the row and different Tricyclic: is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate, ‘Inh’ for inhibitor and ‘Ind’ for inducer. Enzymes CYP2C19 and 2D6 are rimmed to emphasize their importance in these tertiary amines’ metabolic destiny. Related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 7 of 12 Fig. 8 Secondary amines metabolic profile. From left to right, in the first column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes, one for each row; in the second and third columns relationship between corresponding enzyme of the row and different Tricyclic: is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate, ‘Inh’ for inhibitor and ‘Ind’ for inducer. Enzyme 2D6 is rimmed to emphasize their importance in these secondary amines’ metabolic destiny. Related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer migraine (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, psychiatric In fact, it’s evident as drugs present in the proposed regi- and musculoskeletal) [47–49] and which require the men impact in a different way (as substrate, inhibitors introduction of other drugs into therapy, further compli- and inductors) on differently enzymatic stations vari- cate the situation. ously important for the drug category considered. Moreover, as previously demonstrated, genetic trait of pa- If to that an unfavourable genetic trait is added, as in tient impacts further on the efficacy and toxicity of a drug. the example patient (poor metabolizer for CYP 2D6 and When a therapy is based on more than one drug, the ther- CYP2C19, and with reduction of activity of CYP 2C9), apist has to consider the situation in all its completeness. it’s clear that therapeutic regimen is not well thought Unfavourable drug-drug and/or drug-drug-genome inter- out. Probably Amitriptyline will not work (it’s a tertiary action can represent greats risk factor in the development amine that need to be transformed by CYP2C19 in sec- of adverse drug reaction (ADRs), related to deficient thera- ondary to be then hydrossilated by 2D6), the same for peutic effect or toxicity. And in these ADRs the pos- Captopril (substrate of CYP2D6), Carvedilol (substrate sible real motivation of many of the therapeutic failures of CYP2C9 and 2D6), Ibuprofen (substrate and inhibi- that aggravate already complicated clinical pictures is to be tors of CYP2C9), Losartan (inhibitor and substrate of found, they maintain the pathogenetic processes and induce CYP2C9, inhibitor of CYP2C19), Omeprazol (primary the chronification of the pathology. substrate, inductor and inhibitor of CYP2C19, but more- For the explanatory purpose of the above-mentioned, over substrate and inhibitor of CYP2C9 and inhibitor of let consider the plausible situation of a patient suffering 2D6) and Torasemide (substrate of CYP2C9 and inhibi- from arterial hypertension and chronic migraine. The tor of 2C19). These only citing the enzymatic stations patient in question is treated for the arterial hyperten- that would show a reduced activity on the basis of the sion with a sartan (Losartan), a β-blocker (Carvedilol), genetic trait. an Ace-inhibitor (Captopril), a diuretic (Torasemide); for A therapeutic approach based on the personalized the prophylactic treatment of migraine, he takes a tricyc- medicine allows to remedy similar situation by setting lic (Amitriptyline); during migraine attacks he uses an from the beginning a therapy based on drugs metabolic- NSAID (Ibuprofen); to complete this therapeutic regi- ally non-interfering with each other and with the func- men employs a PPI (Omeprazol) [Fig. 9]. tional biochemical profile of the patient, or alternatively, Without information about the genetic profile of the in the case of already established therapies, adjusting the patient, it is possible to state that the therapeutic regi- shot making the therapeutic regime more effective and men is not the best under the metabolic point of view. avoiding the ADRs that can develop due to unfavourable Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 8 of 12 Fig. 9 Drug-drug interaction involved in a polytherapy for hypertension, prophylactic therapy for chronic migraine and episodes of acute attacks. From left to right, in the first column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes, one for each row, each following column represent a drug the relationship between a drug and an enzyme/transporter is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate, ‘Inh’ for inhibitor and ‘Ind’ for inducer. The colours of different rows indicate the increase in metabolic pressure passing by the various colours ranging from yellow to orange, to red, to dark red. Related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer drug-drug and/or drug-drug-genome interactions. In re- CYP2C19 and is not substrate and inhibitor of CYP2C9 ferring to previous example, the therapeutic regimen and inhibitor of 2D6), at last in case of acute attacks as could be optimized choosing drugs compatible both with NSAIDs Ketorolac (that differently from Ibuprofen is biochemical profile of the patient and with his clinical not substrate and inhibitors of CYP2C9). Moreover, in necessity, for example selecting as sartan Eprosartan this way, drug-drug interactions that can be unfavour- (that differently from Losartan is only inhibitor, but not able on other metabolic stations are drastically reduced. substrate of CYP2C9, ant it is not inhibitor of [Fig. 10]. CYP2C19), as β-blocker Esmolol (that differently from Carvedilol not is substrate of CYP2C9 and CYP2D6), as New therapeutic perspectives Ace-inhibitor Enalapril (that differently from Captopril The possibility of a personalized pharmacological poly- is not substrate of CYP2D6), as diuretic Furosemide pharmacy, calibrated on the patient’s functional bio- (that differently from Torasemide not is substrate of chemical abilities and on the further therapeutic CYP2C9 and inhibitor of CYP2C19), as tricyclic Mapro- necessities dictated by the comorbidities of the same, tyline (that differently from Amitriptyline it is only sub- seems to contrast with some biotechnological drugs, al- strate but not inhibitor of CYP2D6 and is not substrate beit with the limit of being mostly still under study. It’s a of CYP2C19), as PPI Esomeprazole (that differently from matter of monoclonal antibodies, antagonist molecules Omeprazol is only inhibitor but not substrate of and agonist molecules crucial in migraine mechanism. Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 9 of 12 Fig. 10 Drug-drug interaction involved in optimized polytherapy for hypertension, prophylactic therapy for chronic migraine and episodes of acute attacks optimization of previous therapy. From left to right, in the first column there is the list of drug metabolizing enzymes, one for each row, each following column represent a drug the relationship between a drug and an enzyme/transporter is indicated by the symbol ‘S’ for substrate, ‘Inh’ for inhibitor and ‘Ind’ for inducer. The colours of different rows indicate the increase in metabolic pressure passing by the various colours ranging from yellow to orange, to red, to dark red. X = link to related scientific articles about the items in the first column accessible through the related page at the website http://bioinformatics.charite.de/transformer These not having a metabolic destiny, or rather not be- against CGPR have been developed for prophylactic ing subjected to enzymatic transformations or substrates purposes. of membrane transporters, allow to bypass the obstacles dictated by different functional biochemical settings of Gepants each individual patient and by the metabolically Gepants are non –peptide CGRP able to reduce the unfavourable drug interactions, common in the activity of the trigeminal- vascular system. Their ef- polytherapies. fectiveness is similar to the triptans one, but differ- One of the pathogenetic mechanisms under study for ently from triptans not inducing vasoconstriction, the structuring of the drugs in question is represented gepants have no side effect related to this event. by the activation of trigeminal neurons which involves Moreover, they show a prolonged effect of action the release of some neuropeptides (CGRP substance P, compared to the triptans. PACAP and nitric oxide). These cause at the peripheral Among these, olcegepant (BIBN4096BS) is the first level vasodilatation of the meningeal blood vessels and neuropeptide antagonist of CGRP receptor used with reflex stimulation of the parasympathetic system. In success since 10 years. This drug binds a part of the particular, to date, therapeutic drugs interfere with the CGRP receptor (RAMP1), competing with endogenus vasodilatory mechanism induced by the CGRP are in use CGRP. Unfortunately, the bioavailability is reduced and object of study. Regarding the use in the acute by oral abministration because this drug has a poor phase, two categories of drugs have been designed penetration across the Blood-brain barrier (BBB), in fact (Gepants and Ditans), whereas monoclonal antibodies it proves effective after intravenous administration, this Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 10 of 12 constitutes an obstacle to the common use from migrai- antibodies are to be found in the protective role of neurs. CGRP. This is able to counteract the development of Telcagepant (MK - 0974) is the oral CGRP receptor hypertension, because it has a direct action on smooth antagonist developed following in the footsteps of the muscle cells in the vessel wall, particularly marked at the olcegepant. It is rapidly absorbed, with a Tmax of 1.5 h microvascular level, to which it is attributed the estab- and terminal half-life 6 h , it proves effective in treat- lishment of peripheral resistance and so of the blood ing migraine associated symptoms, such as photophobia, pressure. In the same way, having CGRP an vasodilatory phonophobia and nausea. But the most important side effect, the use of this monoclonal antibodies induces a effect is a hepatotoxicity that may be dose- and reduction of CGRP’s in cardio-protective mechanisms time-dependent in consideration to an observed increase during ischemia. The unique drug directed against in transaminases. the receptor is Erenumab, the other ones (Galcanezumab, Ubrogepant (MK-1602) and Rimegepant (BMS-927711) Fremanezumab and Eptinezumab) are directed against actually at phase III of study, represents the latest gepants CGRP. object of study, but there are currently no definitive data Erenumab is a human immunoglobulin G2 monoclo- regarding efficacy, bioavailability of side effects of such nal antibody designed specifically to bind and antagonize drugs. the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor (CGRPR). The most common side effects of erenumab include Ditans pain, redness, or swelling at the injection site, and Ditans are agonist of 5-HTR selective for the type 1F, constipation. this one decreases the release of excitatory transmitters Galcanezumab is a fully humanized monoclonal anti- and CGRP in a trigeminal-vascular system. Differently body against human calcitonin gene-related peptide from triptans, that bind to the 5HT 1B e 5HT 1D recep- (CGRP), is administered as a subcutaneous injection. tors, they do not induce peripheral vasoconstriction des- There are clinical evidence that shown a significant re- pite having a similar therapeutic efficacy on the duction in the mean number of migraine headache days migraine. So, they are better tolerated and with less con- and a drug’s good tolerability profile. The most traindications related to the peripheral vasoconstriction commonly reported adverse events are headache, naso-. The most used today is Lasmiditan, that was shown pharyngitis, hematuria, dermatitis, diarrhea, toothache, to be efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT). acute migraine in patients with a high level of cardiovas- Fremanezumab is a genetically engineered humanized cular risk factors. monoclonal antibody against human calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Ongoing clinical trials CGRP monoclonal antibodies for the agent are directed to people with episodic and The use with a prophylaxis purpose is supported by their chronic migraine as well as cluster headaches. It is adminis- lower onset of action and much longer half-life, differ- trated in a monthly subcutaneous injection. The most ently from CGRP receptor antagonist. Compared to commonly reported adverse events included injection site other drugs used in prophylaxis CGRP monoclonal anti- erythema, injection site induration, diarrhea, anxiety, and bodies might be administrated less frequently, in fact depression. previous drugs (like triptans) are recommended orally Eptinezumab is a fully humanized IgG1 antibody man- one to three times daily, antibodies one up to once a ufactured using yeast. It is currently in clinical trials month. Compared from CGRP’s receptor antago- for preventing migraine attacks. It has been specifically nists these monoclonal antibodies are highly selective, designed to bind to both alpha and beta forms of the hu- this avoids the reported toxic effects of CGRP’s receptor man calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The most antagonists. Moreover, different studies, as early clinical frequent adverse events include upper respiratory tract trials, have also shown that humanized monoclonal anti- infection, urinary tract infection, fatigue, back pain, arth- bodies against CGRP have proven successful in reducing ralgia, and nausea and vomiting. the frequency of migraine headaches as a preventative therapeutic. However, there are polymorphism in Conclusions the CGRP receptor pathway, which have been investi- A personalized approach for setting the therapies that gated, that increase the risk of migraine evolution into every patient needs, dictated by the evaluation of the co- the complication of medication oversue. We also morbidities and the functional biochemical structure of have to mention a negative study on this matter reveal- the same, represents a goal in the therapeutic field by re- ing that polymorphism in CGRP pathaways might be the ducing the possibility of establishing side effects related signal of differences between CGRP mAB responders vs. to therapies that affect the clinical course of each pa- non-responders. The side effects of this monoclonal tient. The new biotechnological drugs currently being Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 11 of 12 studied could represent a valid alternative that needs to Received: 18 January 2019 Accepted: 5 May 2019 be further refined to date, with the aim of reducing the already highlighted limitations of the same correlated to the contraindications linked to the comorbidities and to References the adverse effects recorded. 1. World Health organization. (2001); World Healt report 2001: mental health: new undersanding, new hope Abbreviations 2. Leonadri M, Steiner TJ, Sacher AT, Lipton RB (2005) The global burden of ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; ADR: Adverse drug reaction; migraine: measuring disability in headache disorderswith WHO’s classification ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; BBB: Blood-brain barrier; CGRP: Calcitonin of Funtioning, disability and Healt (ICF). J Headache Pain 6(6):429–440 gene related peptide; CH: Chronic headache; DDI: Drug – drug interaction; 3. Headache Classification Subcommettee of International Society (2004) The EDNRA: Endothelin type A receptor; GWAS: Genome-wide association international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edn. Cephalalgia studies; MA: Migraine with aura; MAO-A: Monoamine oxidase A; 24(Suppl 1):1–160 MHTFR: Methylenetetrahydrofolate; MO: Migraine without aura; 4. Bigal ME, Lipton RB (2009) The epidemiology, burden, and comorbidities of MOH: Medications overuse headache; NOS3: End othelial nitric oxide migraine. Neurol Clin 27:321–334 synthase type 3; NOTCH3: Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3; 5. Bhinge AA, Kim J, Euskirchen GM, Snyder M, Iyer VR (2007) Mapping the NSAID: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; OPRM1: Opioid receptor mu 1; chromosomal targets of STAT1 by sequence tag analysis of genomic PPI: Proton-pump inhibitor; SNP: Single nucleotide polymorphism; enrichment (STAGE). Genome Res 17(6):910–916 TCA: Tricyclic Antidepressant; TGFB2: β-2 transforming growth factor; 6. Di Lorenzo C, Grieco GS, Saltorelli FM (2012) Migraine headache: a review of TGFB2R: β-2 transforming growth factor receptor; VIP: Vasoactive intestinal the molecular genetics of common disorder. J Headache Pain 13:571–580 peptide 7. Gasparini CF, Sutherland HG, Griffiths LR (2013) Studies on the pathophysiology and genetic basis of migraine. Curr Genomics 14:300–315 Acknowledgements 8. Schurks M (2012) Genetics of migraine in the age of genoma-wide The APCs (article processing charges) for the articles in this thematic series associations studies. J Headache Pain 13(1):1–9 ‘The Changing faces of migraine’ were made possible through independent 9. Lichtenwalter k Z–, Meloto CB, Khoury S, Diatchenko L (2016) Genetic educational sponsorship by Eli Lilly. Eli Lilly provided the funds through an predictions of human chronic pain conditions. Neuroscience 338:36–62 educational grant which included enduring materials within the context of a 10. Diener HC, Limmorth V (2004) Medication-overuse headache: a worldwide symposium at the 12th European Headache Federation Congress in problem. Lancet Neurol 3:475–483 September 2018, chaired by Paolo Martelletti. This grant was provided to 11. Kotani K, Shimomura T, Shimomura F, Ikawa S, Nanba E (2002) A Springer Healthcare IME who organized the symposium and all of the polymorphism in the serotonin trasporter gene regulatory region and enduring materials. Three of the articles in this thematic series were frequency of migraine attacks. Headache 42:893–895 developed from content presented at the symposium. Eli Lilly were not 12. Park JW, Kim JS, Kim YI, Lee KS Serotoninergic activity contributes to analgesic involved in the planning of the thematic series, the selection process for overuse in chronic ntension-type headache. Headache 45:1229–1235 topics, nor in any peer review or decision-making processes. 13. Cevoli S, Sancisi E, Grimaldi D, Pierangeli G, Zanigni S, Nicodemo M, Cortelli The articles have undergone the journal’s standard peer review process P, Montagna P (2009) Family history for chronic headache and drug overuse overseen by the Editor-in- Chief. For articles where the Editor-in-Chief is an as a risk factor for headache chronification. Headache 49:412–418 author, the peer review process was overseen by one of the other Editors 14. Simmaco M, Borro M, Missori S, Martelletti P (2009) Pharmacogenomics in responsible for this thematic series. migraine: catching biomarkers for predictable disease control. Expert Rev Neurother 9(9):1267–1269 Availability of data and materials 15. Farinelli I, Missori S, Martelletti P (2008) Proinflammatory mediators and Not applicable. migraine pathogenesis: moving towards CGRP as a target for a novel therapeutic class. Expert Rev Neurother 8(9):1347–1354 Authors’ contributions 16. Russell MB (2007) Genetic in primary headaches. J Headache Pain 8(3): LMP and PM conceived the structure and drafted the manuscript. MG, EB, 190–195 MS, MB critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the 17. Mennini FS, Gitto S, Martelletti P (2008) Improving care through health final version of the manuscript. economic analyses: cost of illness and headache. J Headache Pain 9:199–206 18. Hocum BT, White JR Jr, Heck JWE, Thirumaran RK, Moyer N, Newman R, Ashcraft Ethics approval and consent to participate K (2016) Cytochrome P-450 gene and drug interaction analysis in patients Not applicable. referred for pharmacognetic testing. Am J Healting Syst Pharm 73:61–67 19. Ferrari A, Baraldi C, Licata M, Rustichelli C (2018) Polypharmacy Among Consent for publication Headache Patients: A cross-sectional study. CNS drug 32:567–578 Not applicable. 20. Knezevic NN, Tverdohleb T, Knezevic I, Candido KD (2018) The role of genetic polymorphism in chronic pain patients. Int J Mol Sci 19:1707 Competing interests 21. Jinno N, Tagashira M, Tsurui K, Yamada S (2014) Contribution of Cytocrome The authors declare that they have no competing interests. P450 and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase to the metabolism of drug containing carboxylic acid groups: risk assessment of acylglucuronide using human hepatocytes. Xenobiotica 44:677–686 Publisher’s Note 22. Ingelman-Sundberg M (2005) The human genome project and novel Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in aspects of Cytocrome P450 research. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207:52–56 published maps and institutional affiliations. 23. Sànchez-Diz P, Estanyl-Gestal A, Aguirre C, Blanco A, Carracedo A, Ibànez L, Passiu M, Provezza L, Ramos-Ruiz R, Ruiz B, Salado-Valdivieso I, Velasco EA, Author details Figueiras A (2009) Prevalence of CYP2C9 polymorphism in the south of 1 Residency Program in Laboratory Medicine, Gabriele d’Annunzio University, Europe. Pharmacogenomics J 9:306–310 Chieti, Italy. 2Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, 24. Gao Y, Liu D, Wang H, Zhu J, Chen C (2010) Funcional characterization of Italy. 3Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University five CYP2C8 variants and prediction of 2C8 genotype dependent effects on of Sassari, Sassari, Italy. 4Residency Program in Hygiene and Preventive in vitro and in vivo drug-drug interactions. Xenobiotica 40:467–475 Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 5Department of 25. Daily EB, Aquilante CL (2009) Cytochrome P450 2C8 pharmacogenetics: a Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of reviw of clinical studies. Pharmacogenomics 20:1489–1510 Rome, Rome, Italy. 6Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza 26. Ingelman-Sundberg M, Sim SC, Gòmez A, Rodrìguez-Antona C (2007) Influence University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 7Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine of Cytochrome P450 polymorphism on drugs therapies: pharmacogenomic, Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. pharmacogenetic and clinical aspects. Pharmacol Ther 116:496–626 Pomes et al. The Journal of Headache and Pain (2019) 20:56 Page 12 of 12 27. Aithal GP, Day CP (2007) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced 50. Pomes LM, Gentile G, Borro M, Simmaco M, Martelletti P (2018) Tailoring hepatotoxicity. Clin Liver Dis 11:563–575 Treatement in Polymorbid Migraine Patients trought Personalized Medicine. 28. Kirchheiner J, Stormer E, Meisel C, Stainbach N, Roots I, Brockmoller J (2003) CNS drug- springer. Nature 32:559–565 Influence of CYP2C9 genetic polimorfhisms on pharmacokinetics of 51. Goadsby PJ, Edvisson L, Ekmark R (1988) Relase of vasoactive peptides in celecoxib and its metabolites. Pharmacogenetics 13:473–480 the extracerebral circulation of humans and the cat during activation of the 29. Hutt AJ, Caldwell J, Smith RL (1986) The metabolism of aspirin in man: a trigeminovascular system population study. Xenobiotica 16:239–249 52. Link AS, Kuris A, Edvinsson L (2008) Treatment of migraine attacks 30. Kuehl GE, Bigler J, Potter JD, Lampe JW (2006) Glucuronidation of the based on the interaction with the trigemino-cerebrovascular system. J Aspirine metabolite salicylic acid by expressed UDP-glucuronosyltrasferase Headache Pain 9:5–12 and human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 34:100–202 53. Olesen J, Diener HC, Husstedt IW, Goadsby PJ, Hall D, Meier U et al (2004) 31. Lagas JS, Sparidans RW, Wagenaar E, Beijnen JH, Chinkel AH (2010) Hepatic Calcitonin gene-releted peptide receptor antagonist BIBn4096 BS for acute clearance of reactive glucuronide metabolites of diclofenac in the mouse is treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med 350:1104–1110 dependent on multiple ATP-binding cassette efflux transporters. Mol 54. Mallee JJ, Salvatore CA, LeBourdelles B, Oliver KR, Longmore J, Koblan KS Pharmacol 77:687–694 et al (2002) Receptor activity-modifying protein 1 determines the species 32. Krasniqi V, Dimovski A, Domajanovic IK, Bilic I, Bozina N (2016) How selectivity of non-peptide CGRP receptor antagonists. J Biol Chem 277: polymorphism of cytochrome P450 genes affect ibuprofen and diclofenac 14294–14298 metabolism and toxicity. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 67:1–8 55. Kuzawińska O, Lis K, Cessak G, Mirowska-guzel D, Balkowiec-Iskra E 33. Schürks M, Kurth T, Stude P, Rimmbach C, de Jesus J, Jonjic M, Diener HC, (2016) Targeting of calcitonin gene-related peptide action as a new Rosskopf D (2007) G protein beta3 polymorphism and triptan response in strategy for migraine treatment. Neurol I Neurochir Polska Rev Art 50: cluster headache. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82(4):396–401 463–467 34. Gentile G, Borro M, Noemi L, Missori S, Simmaco M, Martelletti P (2010) 56. Brain SD, Cambridge H (1996) Calcitonin gene-related peptide: vasoactive Genetic polymorphism related to efficacy and overuse of triptans in chronic effects and potential therapeutic role. Gen Pharmacol 27:607–611 migraine. J Headache pain 11:431–435 57. Holland PR, Goadsby PJ (2018) Targetd CGRP small molecule antagonist for 35. Christensen AF, Esserlind AL, Werge T, Stefánsson H, Stefánsson K, Olesen J acute migraine therapy. Neurotherapeutics 15:304–312 (2016) The influence of genetic constitution on migraine drug responses. 58. Oswald JC, Schuster NM (2018) Lasmiditan for the treatment of acute Cephalalgia. 36(7):624–639 migraine: a review and potential role in clinical practice. J of Pain Research 36. Lacey LF, Hussey EK, Flower PA (1995) Single dose pharmacokinetics of 11:2221–2227 Sumatriptan in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 47:543–548 59. Kuca B, Silberstein SD, Wietecha L, Berg PH, Dozier G, Lipton RB (2018) COL 37. Thomsen LL, Dixon R, Lassen LH, Giboens M, Langemark M, Bendtsen L, MIG-301 Study Group; Lasmiditan is an effective acute treatment for Daugaard D, Olsen J (1996) C11C90(Zolmitriptan) a novel centrally and migraine: A phase 3 randomized study. Neurology. 91(24):e2222–e2232 peripheral acting oral 5-hydroxytryptamine-1D agonist: a comparison of 60. Tfelt-Hansen PC (2013) Evidence-based guideline update: pharmacologic its absorption during a migraine attack and in migraine-free period. treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults: report of the quality Cephalgia 16:270–275 standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the 38. Poulsen L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Brosen K, indrup SH (1996) The Hypoalgesic American headache society. Neurology 80:869–870 effect of tramadol in relatation to CYP2D6. Clin Pharmacol Ther 60:636–644 61. Monteith D, Collins EC, Vandermeulen C, Van Hecken A, Raddad E, Scherer 39. Stamer UM, Musshoff F, Kobilay M, Madea B, Hoeft A, Stuber F (2007) JC, Grayzel D, Schuetz TJ, de Hoon J (2017) Safety, tolerability, Concentraction of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol enantiomers in pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the CGRP binding different CYP2D6 genotyper. Clin Pharmacol Ther 107:926–929 monoclonal antibody LY2951742 (Galcanezumab) in healthy volunteers. 40. Mura E, Govoni S, Racchi M, Carossa V, Ranzani GN, Allegri M, van Front Pharmacol 8:740 Schaik RH (2013) Consequences of the 118°>G polymorphism in the 62. Cargnin S, Pautasso C, Viana M, Sances G, Mittino D, Cantello R, OPRM1 gene: transation from bench to beside? J Pain Res 6:331–353 Tassorelli C, Nappi G, Terrazzino S (2015) Association of RAMP1 rs7590387 with the risk of migraine transformation into medication 41. Rudorfer MV, Potter WZ (1999) Metabolism of tricyclic antidepressant. Cell overuse headache. Headache. 55(5):658–668 Mol Neurobiol 19:373–409 63. Sutherland HG, Buteri J, Menon S, Haupt LM, Macgregor EA, Lea RA, Griffiths 42. Hicks JK, Swn JJ, Sangkuhl K, Karasch ED, Elligrod VL, Skaar TC, Muller DJ, LR (2013) Association study of the calcitonin gene-related polypeptide- Gaedigk A, Stingl JC (2013) Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation alpha (CALCA) and the receptor activity modifying 1 (RAMP1) genes with consortium guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of migraine. Gene. 515(1):187–192 tricyclic antidepressants. CPIC Guidelines 93(5):402–408 64. Smillie SJ, King R, Kodji X, Outzen E, Pozgai G, Fernandes E et al (2014) An 43. Bertilsson L, Aberg-Wistedt A, Gustafsson LL, Nordin C (1985) Extremely ongoing role of α- calcitonin gene- related peptide as part of a protective rapid hydrossilation of debrisoquine: a case report with implication for network aginst hypertention, vascular hypertrophy, and oxidative stress. treatment with nortriptyline and other tricyclic antidepressant. Ther Hypertention 63(5):1056–1062 Drug Monit 7:478–480 65. Pellesi L, Guerzoni S, Pini LA (2017) Spotlight on anti-CGRP monoclonal 44. Bertilsson L, Mellstrom B, Sjokvist F, Martenson B, Asberg M (1981) Slow antibodies in migraine: the clinical evidence to date. Clin Pharmacol hydrossilation of nortriptyline and concomitant poor debrisoquine Drug Dev 6(6):534–547 hydrossilation: clinical implication. Lancet 1:560–561 66. Lambru G, Andreou AP, Guglielmetti M, Martelletti P (2018) Emerging drugs 45. Stingl JC, Brokemoller J, Viviani R (2013) Genetic variability of drug- for migraine treatment: an update. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. https://doi. metabolizing enzymes: the dual impact on psychiatric therapy and org/10.1080/14728214.2018.1552939 regulation of brain function. Mol Psychiatry. 18(3):273–87. 67. Vollbracht S, Rapoport AM (2014) New treatments for headache. Neurol Sci 46. Palleria C, Di Paolo A, Giofrè C, Caglioti C, Leuzzi G, Siniscaclchi A, De 1(35):89–97 Sarro G, Gallelli L (2013) Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction and 68. Lionetto L, Cipolla F, Guglielmetti M, Martelletti P (2019) Fremanezumab their implication in clinical management. J Res Med Sci 18:601–610 for the prevention of chronic and episodic migraine. Drugs Today 55(4): 47. van Os HJA, Mulder IA, Broesen A, Algra A, van der SChaaf IC, Kappelle LJ, 265–276 Velthuis BK, Terwindt GM, Schoenville WJ, Viser MC, Ferrari MD, van Wakderveen 69. Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Olesen J, Ashina M, Wilks K, MAA, Wermwe MJH, DUST investigators (2017) Migraine and cerebrovascular Kudrow D, Kroll R, Kohrman B, Bargar R, Hirman J, Smith J (2014) Safety and atherosclerosis in patient with ischemic stroke. Stroke 48:1973–1975 efficacy of ALD403, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the 48. Seidel S, Beisteiner R, Manecke M, Aslan TS, Wöber C (2017) Psychiatric prevention of frequent episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, comorbidities and photophobia in patient with migraine. J Headache placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol 13(11):1100–1107 Pain 18:18 49. de Tommaso M, Sciruicchio V, Delussi M, Vecchio E, Goffredo M, Simeone M, Barbaro MGF (2017) Symptoms of central sensitization and comorbidity for juvenile fibromyalgia in childhood migraine; an observational study in a tert6iary center. J Headache Pain 18:59

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser