Fisheries Science Exam PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by HeartwarmingBauhaus4589
University of Western Australia
Tags
Summary
This document is a compilation of lecture notes, papers, and reports on fisheries science and the impacts of fishing on marine ecosystems, including topics such as historical overfishing, the Sea Around Us project, and sustainable practices. The provided content appears to be a summary of a course, rather than a complete exam paper.
Full Transcript
Table of Contents {#table-of-contents.TOCHeading} ================= [Lectures (Dirk) 2](#lectures-dirk) [Lectures (guest) 2](#lectures-guest) [Lecture papers 2](#lecture-papers) [Papers 3](#papers) [Collapse and recovery of marine fishes (Hutchings 2000) 3](#collapse-and-recovery-of-marine-fish...
Table of Contents {#table-of-contents.TOCHeading} ================= [Lectures (Dirk) 2](#lectures-dirk) [Lectures (guest) 2](#lectures-guest) [Lecture papers 2](#lecture-papers) [Papers 3](#papers) [Collapse and recovery of marine fishes (Hutchings 2000) 3](#collapse-and-recovery-of-marine-fishes-hutchings-2000) [Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems (2001) 3](#historical-overfishing-and-the-recent-collapse-of-coastal-ecosystems-2001) [Towards sustainability in world fisheries (Pauly 2002) 3](#towards-sustainability-in-world-fisheries-pauly-2002) [The Sea Around Us Project: Documenting and communicating global fisheries impacts on marine ecosystems (Pauly 2007) 4](#the-sea-around-us-project-documenting-and-communicating-global-fisheries-impacts-on-marine-ecosystems-pauly-2007) [Counting on small-scale fisheries (Pauly 2015) 4](#counting-on-small-scale-fisheries-pauly-2015) [MSY needs no epitaph---but it was abused (Pauly 2020) 4](#msy-needs-no-epitaphbut-it-was-abused-pauly-2020) [Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining (Pauly 2016) 5](#catch-reconstructions-reveal-that-global-marine-fisheries-catches-are-higher-than-reported-and-declining-pauly-2016) [Fisheries and policy implications for human nutrition (Vianna 2020b) 5](#fisheries-and-policy-implications-for-human-nutrition-vianna-2020b) [Global fisheries science documents human impacts on oceans: The Sea Around Us serves civil society in the twenty-first century (Zeller 2023) 6](#global-fisheries-science-documents-human-impacts-on-oceans-the-sea-around-us-serves-civil-society-in-the-twenty-first-century-zeller-2023) [Still catching attention: Sea Around Us reconstructed global catch data, their spatial expression and public accessibility (Zeller, 2016) 6](#still-catching-attention-sea-around-us-reconstructed-global-catch-data-their-spatial-expression-and-public-accessibility-zeller-2016) [The 'presentist bias' in time-series data: implications for fisheries science and policy (Zeller, 2018) 6](#the-presentist-bias-in-time-series-data-implications-for-fisheries-science-and-policy-zeller-2018) [Viewpoint: Back to the Future for fisheries, where will we choose to go? (Zeller 2019) 7](#viewpoint-back-to-the-future-for-fisheries-where-will-we-choose-to-go-zeller-2019) [Farming fish in the sea will not nourish the world (Belton, 2020) 7](#farming-fish-in-the-sea-will-not-nourish-the-world-belton-2020) [Aquaculture over-optimism? (Sumalia 2022) 8](#aquaculture-over-optimism-sumalia-2022) [Fishing down marine food webs (Pauly 1998) 9](#fishing-down-marine-food-webs-pauly-1998) [Modern slavery and the race to fish (Tickler 2018b) 9](#modern-slavery-and-the-race-to-fish-tickler-2018b) Lectures (Dirk) =============== Lectures (guest) ================ Lecture papers ============== Papers ====== ### Collapse and recovery of marine fishes (Hutchings 2000) Background: Actual changes in population size following long-term declines has never been examined only potential for recovery Key message: Very little evidence for rapid recovery of from prolonged decline in contrast to the perception that marine fishes are highly resilient to large populaiton reducitons Findings: 90 stocks examined (except the cods and herrings) has experienced little recovery (if any) 15 years after the 45-49% reduction in biomass. ### Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems (2001) Background: Human activities, particularly overfishing, have historically impacted marine ecosystems. Species targeted by fishing often play crucial roles in maintaining ecological balance. Message: Overfishing doesn't immediately alter ecosystems due to temporary compensation by other species of similar trophic levels. However, this is unsustainable, as those substitute species also become overfished or face disease outbreaks from overcrowding. Finding: There is often a significant time lag between the start of overfishing and observable ecological changes. This delay underscores ecosystems\' initial resilience, but also reveals the eventual breakdown when overfishing continues unchecked. ### Towards sustainability in world fisheries (Pauly 2002) Background: Pauly et al. (2002) address the critical state of global fisheries and the urgent need for sustainable management practices. The authors discuss the overexploitation of fish stocks and the ecological and economic consequences of unsustainable fishing practices, emphasizing the interconnectedness of marine ecosystems and human communities reliant on fisheries. Key Message: The study underscores the necessity of shifting towards sustainable fisheries management to prevent further declines in fish populations and to ensure the long-term viability of marine resources. The authors argue that integrating ecological principles with fisheries management policies is essential for achieving sustainability and maintaining the health of marine ecosystems. Findings: Pauly et al. propose a range of strategies to promote sustainable fisheries, including the implementation of quotas, the establishment of marine protected areas, and the reduction of fishing capacity. They conclude that a collaborative approach involving governments, fisheries, and communities is vital for transitioning towards sustainable fishing practices and ensuring the resilience of global fish stocks for future generations. ### The Sea Around Us Project: Documenting and communicating global fisheries impacts on marine ecosystems (Pauly 2007) Background: SAR founded by Pew Charitable Trusts and based at the University of British Columbia, began in 1999. They assess and mitigate the ecological impacts of fishing on marine ecosystems. Initially, the project focused on the North Atlantic, leveraging extensive data to test its methodologies Key Message: Through comprehensive data mapping and global analyses, the project has documented significant declines in high-trophic species and provided evidence of ecosystem shifts. Its work highlights the role of fisheries in biodiversity loss and contributes essential insights to global conservation initiatives, such as the Marine Trophic Index for the Convention on Biological Diversity. Findings: The project has evolved into a global effort, influencing policies and fostering collaboration across academia and environmental NGOs. By focusing on worldwide data, it has reshaped perceptions of fisheries, from a benign activity to a leading cause of oceanic biodiversity decline. ### Counting on small-scale fisheries (Pauly 2015) Background: The 2015 paper by Daniel Pauly addresses the often-overlooked role of small-scale fisheries in global food security, livelihoods, and marine conservation. Small-scale fisheries are vital to millions of coastal communities but have traditionally received less attention than industrial fisheries. Key Message: Pauly argues that small-scale fisheries are more sustainable and socially beneficial than industrial counterparts. He emphasizes the need for better data, management, and support for these fisheries, as they are essential to maintaining biodiversity and supporting local economies. Findings: The paper suggests that strengthening small-scale fisheries can help address overfishing and food security issues. Pauly advocates for policy shifts to prioritize these fisheries and reduce the dominance of industrial fleets, ensuring more equitable and sustainable use of marine resources. ### MSY needs no epitaph---but it was abused (Pauly 2020) Background: In this 2020 paper, Daniel Pauly and Rainer Froese revisit the concept of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY), a traditional fisheries management target meant to balance fish extraction with long-term population stability. MSY has faced criticism due to widespread misuse and oversimplification in practice. Key Message: Pauly and Froese argue that while MSY remains a valuable concept, it has been misapplied, often leading to overfishing. They stress the importance of using MSY responsibly within a broader ecosystem-based management approach to ensure its effectiveness and sustainability. Findings: The authors propose adjustments to how MSY is implemented, advocating for careful, context-specific applications that consider ecosystem health. Their work underscores the need to reform fisheries management practices to prevent MSY's misuse and better align it with conservation goals. ### Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining (Pauly 2016) Background: Pauly and Zeller (2016) investigated global fishery data to understand the true extent of marine catches, suspecting that official reports underestimated total catches. Their study reconstructed catch data from 1950 to 2010, offering a more accurate view of global fisheries. Key Message: The study found that global catches were about 50% higher than officially reported, revealing significant underreporting in fisheries data. It also showed a steady decline in catches since the 1990s, signaling overfishing and resource depletion. Findings: Total catches peaked at around 130 million tonnes in the mid-1990s but have since dropped by approximately 1.2 million tonnes per year. This decline highlights the urgent need for transparent data and better fisheries management to address overexploitation. ### Fisheries and policy implications for human nutrition (Vianna 2020b) Background: Vianna, Zeller, and Pauly (2020) explore the crucial role of fisheries in global nutrition and food security. The paper discusses how overfishing and declining fish stocks pose significant threats to human health and dietary diversity. Key Message: The authors argue that sustainable fisheries management is essential for ensuring access to fish as a vital source of protein and nutrients for millions of people worldwide. They emphasize the need for policies that balance fishery productivity with ecological sustainability to support both human nutrition and marine ecosystems. Findings: The study highlights that fish provide about 3.2 billion people with at least 20% of their average per capita intake of animal protein. To maintain these benefits, the authors advocate for implementing effective fisheries policies and practices that prioritize sustainability and protect marine resources. ### Global fisheries science documents human impacts on oceans: The Sea Around Us serves civil society in the twenty-first century (Zeller 2023) Background: Zeller, Palomares, and Pauly (2023) examine the ongoing impacts of human activities on marine ecosystems through the lens of the Sea Around Us Project. The paper discusses how the project provides crucial data and insights that inform both scientific understanding and public policy regarding fisheries management. Key Message: The authors argue that the data generated by the Sea Around Us Project highlights the severity of human-induced changes in marine environments, such as overfishing and habitat degradation. They emphasize the importance of accessible scientific information for civil society, enabling stakeholders to advocate for sustainable fisheries practices and marine conservation. Findings: The study finds that the project has contributed significantly to raising awareness of the detrimental effects of fisheries on ocean health and has supported various global initiatives aimed at improving marine resource management. By providing comprehensive data, the authors assert that the Sea Around Us empowers communities and policymakers to take action towards sustainable ocean stewardship. ### Still catching attention: Sea Around Us reconstructed global catch data, their spatial expression and public accessibility (Zeller, 2016) Background: Zeller et al. (2016) present the findings of the Sea Around Us Project, which reconstructed historical global fisheries catch data to address the gaps in official reporting. The study aims to provide a more accurate representation of global fishery catches and their distribution, making this data publicly accessible. Key Message: The authors highlight the importance of having reliable and comprehensive catch data to inform fisheries management and policy decisions. They emphasize that the reconstructed data offers valuable insights into fishing patterns and trends, which can help address issues related to overfishing and resource sustainability. Findings: The paper reports that the Sea Around Us Project\'s catch reconstructions indicate a significant underreporting of global fish catches, with data revealing trends and patterns not captured in official statistics. By making this data publicly accessible, the authors advocate for greater transparency and informed decision-making in fisheries management to promote sustainable practices and better protect marine ecosystems. ### The 'presentist bias' in time-series data: implications for fisheries science and policy (Zeller, 2018) Background: Zeller and Pauly (2018) address the issue of presentist bias in fisheries research, where emphasis is placed on recent data at the expense of historical information. This bias can distort our understanding of fish population trends and the effectiveness of management practices over time. Key Message: The authors argue that presentist bias undermines fisheries science and policy by neglecting the historical context needed to evaluate current fish stock conditions and management effectiveness. They stress the importance of incorporating long-term data to better inform sustainable fisheries management. Findings: The paper highlights that ignoring historical data can lead to misinterpretations of fish stock health and trends, ultimately compromising policy decisions aimed at sustainability. Zeller and Pauly call for a more balanced approach to data analysis that includes both historical and contemporary information to improve fisheries science and management practices. ### Viewpoint: Back to the Future for fisheries, where will we choose to go? (Zeller 2019) Background: Zeller and Pauly (2019) reflect on the trajectory of global fisheries management and the challenges faced in achieving sustainable practices. They highlight the historical context of fisheries exploitation and the critical need for re-evaluating current policies to protect marine ecosystems. Key Message: The authors advocate for a return to sustainable fisheries practices that prioritize ecological health and long-term resource availability. They emphasize that the choices made today will significantly influence the future of fisheries and the health of marine environments. Findings: Zeller and Pauly argue that without substantial changes in management approaches, many fish populations will continue to decline, leading to negative consequences for food security and biodiversity. They call for transformative actions that integrate scientific knowledge, community engagement, and policy reform to ensure the sustainability of global fisheries for future generations. ### Farming fish in the sea will not nourish the world (Belton, 2020) Background: Belton et al. (2020) critically examine the role of marine aquaculture in addressing global food security and nutrition. The authors explore the limitations of sea-based fish farming, arguing that it may not be a sustainable solution to the increasing demand for protein. Key Message: The authors contend that while marine aquaculture has potential, it is often based on unsustainable practices that can harm ecosystems and do not adequately address the nutritional needs of vulnerable populations. They emphasize that a focus on sea farming alone will not resolve the challenges of food insecurity and malnutrition globally. Findings: The study highlights that marine aquaculture can be resource-intensive, often relying on wild-caught fish for feed, which further strains marine ecosystems. Belton et al. conclude that a diversified approach, including sustainable freshwater aquaculture and responsible fisheries management, is essential to effectively nourish the world while preserving marine resources. ### ### Aquaculture over-optimism? (Sumalia 2022) Background: Sumaila et al. (2022) investigate the prevailing perceptions of aquaculture as a panacea for global food security and the sustainability of fish supply. The authors argue that while aquaculture is often promoted as a solution to declining wild fish stocks, it is essential to critically assess its limitations and potential negative impacts on marine ecosystems. Key Message: The authors caution against excessive optimism regarding aquaculture\'s ability to meet the growing global demand for seafood. They emphasize the need for a balanced understanding of aquaculture's role, highlighting that reliance on this sector alone could lead to unforeseen ecological and economic challenges. Findings: The study concludes that while aquaculture can contribute to food security, it should not be viewed as a standalone solution. Instead, the authors advocate for integrated approaches that combine sustainable fisheries management with responsible aquaculture practices to effectively address the complexities of global food systems and environmental sustainability. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries (Pauly 1995) Background: Pauly (1995) introduces the concept of the shifting baseline syndrome, which refers to the gradual change in perceptions of fish populations and ecosystems over time due to generational changes in human experiences. This phenomenon occurs when each generation measures the state of the environment against a progressively altered baseline, often leading to an underestimation of declines in fish stocks and biodiversity. Key Message: Pauly argues that anecdotal evidence, while valuable, can contribute to the shifting baseline syndrome by reinforcing distorted views of historical fish populations. He emphasizes the importance of recognizing and documenting long-term ecological changes to understand the true extent of fish stock depletion and to inform effective fisheries management. Findings: The paper concludes that addressing the shifting baseline syndrome is crucial for developing realistic conservation and management strategies in fisheries. Pauly calls for increased awareness and research into historical baselines to better gauge the health of marine ecosystems and prevent further declines in fish populations. ### Fishing down marine food webs (Pauly 1998) Background: Pauly et al. (1998) analyze the trends in marine fisheries and the impact of fishing on the structure of marine ecosystems. The study highlights the phenomenon of \"fishing down,\" where increasingly lower trophic levels of the food web are targeted as higher trophic level species become depleted due to overfishing. Key Message: The authors argue that this trend of fishing down marine food webs leads to significant ecological consequences, including the disruption of food web dynamics and the loss of biodiversity. They emphasize the need for sustainable fishing practices to mitigate these impacts and preserve marine ecosystems. Findings: The study presents evidence showing that the average trophic level of global fish catches has declined over time, indicating a shift from high-value predator species to lower trophic level species. Pauly et al. conclude that if this trend continues, it could undermine the stability of marine ecosystems and threaten the livelihoods dependent on fisheries, calling for immediate action to ensure sustainable management of marine resources. ### Modern slavery and the race to fish (Tickler 2018b) Background: Tickler et al. (2018) investigate the intersection of illegal fishing practices and human rights abuses, specifically focusing on modern slavery within the fishing industry. The study highlights how the pressures of overfishing and competition for resources can lead to exploitative labor practices, often affecting vulnerable populations. Key Message: The authors argue that the urgent need to address illegal and unsustainable fishing practices is compounded by the human rights violations that occur in the industry. They emphasize that reforming fisheries management must include considerations for labor rights to prevent the exploitation of workers in the fishing sector. Findings: The study reveals that a significant number of fish caught globally are linked to illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, which often involves modern slavery and forced labor. Tickler et al. call for comprehensive policies that not only aim to achieve sustainable fisheries but also protect human rights, ensuring that the push for higher catch levels does not come at the expense of worker welfare and dignity.