2015 ECS Education Policy Analysis PDF

ECS EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS WWW.ECS.ORG Focus in: Study up on important education policies. 2015 FEBRUARY In-state tuition policies under the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Ac...

ECS EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS WWW.ECS.ORG Focus in: Study up on important education policies. 2015 FEBRUARY In-state tuition policies under the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act Mary Fulton and Brian A. Sponsler Ensuring access and affordability to a postsecondary education for veterans and their dependents has long been a focus of federal and The 2015 state state education policy. Developing policy to support educational legislative sessions attainment among these individuals has required state policymakers to address residency requirements for veterans to determine eligibility are a crucial time for in-state tuition benefits. Yet recent revisions to federal statute — changes that go into full effect in July 2015 — have shifted the policy for governors and landscape in a significant and meaningful way. state lawmakers to Beginning July 1, 2015, the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability determine state policy Act (Choice Act) requires that all public postsecondary institutions compliance with the offer in-state tuition rates to qualified veterans and their dependents, regardless of state residency status. This ECS Policy Analysis provides federal Choice Act. state and postsecondary leaders with a review of the Choice Act requirements, key information on deadlines, considerations for evaluating state policy for compliance and examples of policy actions. KEY TAKEAWAYS By July 1, 2015, the Veterans Effective July 1, 2015, the Department States that do not ensure Access, Choice and Accountability of Veterans Affairs will deny benefits all public institutions offer Act will require public payment requests for education in-state tuition rates will postsecondary institutions to courses under the Post-9/11 GI Bill create a disincentive to offer in-state tuition rates to and Montgomery GI Bill-Active Duty at enrollment and persistence qualified veterans and their public institutions that charge qualifying for veteran students and dependents, regardless of state veterans and dependents tuition and their dependents. residency status. fees in excess of in-state rates.  EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES WWW.ECS.ORG In 2014, the U.S. Congress enacted the Choice Act, which requires public higher education institutions to offer in-state tuition rates to qualified veterans and their dependents regardless of state residency status. The bill, House Resolution 3230, was signed into law in August 2014. Under Section 702 of the Choice Act, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is required to disapprove benefit payments for education courses under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and Montgomery GI Bill-Active Duty (MGIB-AD) at public institutions that charge qualifying veterans and dependents tuition and fees in excess of in-state rates. In short, higher education institutions that do not meet the Choice Act requirements will no longer receive tuition and fee reimbursement payments for students attending under either of the two federal GI bills. In addition, qualified beneficiaries of the Marine Gunnery Sergeant John David Fry Scholarship are eligible to receive in-state tuition rates under the law.1 States that do not ensure all public institutions offer in-state tuition rates could increase the cost or complications of attendance for qualified veterans and their dependents to enroll at these campuses, resulting in a disincentive to seeking a postsecondary education. In turn, states would set up barriers to serving veterans and their families, and local communities and businesses would not benefit from their educational advancements. Key dates for state and postsecondary system leaders By July 1, 2015, public higher education institutions must offer qualifying veterans and dependents in-state tuition rates to continue receiving benefits payments under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and Montgomery GI Bill-Active Duty programs. The DATA SNAPSHOT: current legislative sessions, therefore, will be a crucial time for governors and state Post-9/11 GI Bill Utilization lawmakers to ensure their policies are in compliance. If the authority to adopt or modify in-state tuition policies rests with higher education governing boards, they More than one million veterans, also must work within the July 2015 deadline. servicemembers and family members Although the VA intends to grant temporary waivers to some states that are have benefited from the Post-9/11 GI pursuing steps to comply with the Choice Act, policy and education leaders should Bill since the program was launched in aim to meet the deadline to avoid unnecessary confusion over or delays to serving August 2009. Over $30 billion has been student veterans and their dependents. distributed through tuition and other education-related payments to these Eligibility for in-state tuition rates under the individuals and the universities and colleges they attend.3 Choice Act ŠŠ754,229 individuals received The following “covered individuals” are eligible for in-state tuition rates and fees education benefits in 2013; a under the Choice Act: 17 percent increase over 2012 ŠŠ A  veteran who lives in the state (regardless of formal in-state residence (646,302). status) in which the higher education institution is located and enrolls within ŠŠ$10,159,780,620 was distributed for three years of discharge from a period of active duty service of 90 days or the benefits (2013). more. ŠŠTop 10 states with beneficiaries: ŠŠ A  spouse or child using transferred benefits who lives in the state (regardless California, Texas, Florida, Virginia, of formal in-state residence status) in which the higher education institution is located and enrolls within three years of the transferor’s discharge from a Arizona, Georgia, New York, period of active duty service of 90 days or more. Colorado, Maryland and North Carolina; Range = 88,609 to 22,841 ŠŠ A  spouse or child using benefits under the Marine Gunnery Sergeant John individuals. David Fry Scholarship who lives in the state (regardless of formal in-state residence status) in which the higher education institution is located and ŠŠRange for all states = 88,609 enrolls within three years of the servicemember’s death in the line of duty (California) to 1,609 (Vermont).4 following a period of active duty service of 90 days or more.2 ECS POLICY ANALYSIS 2  EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES WWW.ECS.ORG Students who are likely to be most affected by the Choice Act are newly discharged veterans planning to attend college in states where they last served on active duty but have not yet established residency. Students also will be impacted if they transfer to a postsecondary institution in another state and do not meet residency requirements. Dependents of veterans are another group that will be able to take advantage of the Choice Act in-state tuition opportunities and may not have been covered under some states’ policies. A more detailed description of the covered individuals is provided in a Veterans Affairs fact sheet that is included in the endnotes section. Status of in-state tuition policies for student veterans and dependents More than half of the states or their postsecondary systems have enacted policies that require or encourage institutions to offer in-state tuition rates to student veterans and often their dependents, and several states have pending legislation to provide this benefit.5 Many of the states and systems with policies on the books, however, will need to amend — in some cases significantly — to be in compliance with the Choice Act. The remaining states will have to craft legislation or board policies to meet the requirements. A state’s approach to ensuring compliance with the Choice Act will depend, in part, on the involvement required by the legislature, state and system boards, and institutional governing bodies. Examples of states that are addressing the DATA SNAPSHOT: Choice Act requirements Description of Federal Tuition and As more state and system leaders become fully aware of the Choice Fee Reimbursement Programs for Act requirements and the sense of urgency becomes apparent, ECS Veterans and Dependents anticipates that they will take steps to move toward compliance by the July 1, 2015, deadline. New Jersey, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Post-9/11 GI Bill Washington provide examples of states that are addressing the law’s Under the program, full or partial costs for tuition, requirements, but through various means or from different starting fees (including textbooks) and housing at four- points. The New Jersey and Oklahoma legislation would establish an year campuses, community colleges and other in-state tuition policy for veterans and dependents, while Washington postsecondary institutions are paid directly to lawmakers are attempting to tweak existing statute. South Dakota’s institutions or reimbursed to eligible Veterans and their Board of Regents has taken a leadership role and drafted language to dependents. revise state statute in response to the Choice Act. http://www.benefits.va.gov/gibill/higher_learning.asp New Jersey Proposed companion bills in New Jersey, S.B. 849 and A.B. 3967, Montgomery GI Bill-Active Duty (MGIB-AD) directly address the requirements of the Choice Act and would Active duty members of the military who enroll in the create a new policy to offer in-state tuition rates to veterans and their MGIB-AD program and pay $100 per month for 12 dependents. Under the legislation, a veteran or covered individual months are entitled to receive a monthly education who is living in New Jersey and is attending a state public institution of benefit once they complete a minimum service higher education would be regarded as a resident for the purpose of obligation. determining tuition, regardless of their residence. http://www.benefits.va.gov/gibill/montgomery_bill.asp Oklahoma Marine Gunnery Sergeant John David Fry While Oklahoma has allowed certain dependents of active duty military Scholarship (Fry Scholarship) members to be eligible for in-state tuition rates, S.B. 138 would extend The scholarship program pays eligible dependents up these benefits to veterans and their dependents. Students would to 36 months of the full level of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. receive in-state tuition rates, regardless of their residency, if they This includes the tuition and fee payment, a housing are eligible for benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill or other federal allowance, and a books and supplies stipend. The laws authorizing veterans’ educational benefits. Their spouses and scholarship is available for children and surviving dependent children also would be eligible for in-state residency status spouses of servicemembers who died in the line of duty for tuition purposes. after September 10, 2001. http://www.benefits.va.gov/GIBILL/Fry_scholarship.asp ECS POLICY ANALYSIS 3  EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES WWW.ECS.ORG South Dakota In December 2014, the South Dakota Board of Regents approved proposed legislative language to revise existing statute during the 2015 session, which would bring the state into compliance with the Choice Act. The recommended language focuses primarily on the residency status for spouses or children of veterans that would allow them to qualify for in-state tuition rates and fees. In 2012, South Dakota passed legislation to exempt veterans from a 12-month residency requirement, which would not be permitted under the Choice Act. Washington Lawmakers in Washington have introduced legislation, H.B. 5355, that would modify the definition of a resident student to comply with the federal Choice Act. The bill would define a resident student as a person who has separated from the military with honorable service after at least 90 days of active duty service, and who enters a higher education institution in Washington within three years of the date of separation. Existing statute requires at least two years of service to receive in-state tuition rates, places certain residency requirements for veterans and requires them to enroll in an institution within one year of the date of discharge. The proposed legislation also revises state statute to expand in-state tuition benefits to the spouses and dependents of veterans. Key questions for state and postsecondary system leaders The following questions are intended to help state and system leaders evaluate their existing, pending or newly drafted in-state tuition policies with respect to the Choice Act requirements. Do in-state tuition and fee policies: ŠŠ C  over all the eligible veterans and their dependents specified in the Choice Act? Under the Choice Act, qualifying veterans are eligible for in-state tuition rates and fees, as are their spouses (to include same- sex spouses) and children (biological, adopted, pre-adoptive and stepchildren of same-sex spouses). While over half of the states have taken steps to offer in-state tuition rates to veterans and active members of the military, the policies may not include their dependents, or at least not as required by the new federal law. Moreover, some of the policies that apply to veterans may impose restrictions or include provisions that would render them out of compliance. Most importantly, state, system or institutional in-state tuition policies should not exclude any of the covered individuals. ŠŠ A  pply to all public state institutions that accept Post-9/11 GI Bill and Montgomery GI Bill-Active Duty benefit payments? The Choice Act is clear that any public higher education institution that accepts payments under the two federal GI bills must offer in-state tuition rates and fees to qualifying veterans and dependents. In some instances, state policies explicitly or implicitly exclude particular postsecondary systems or campuses from offering in-state tuition rates to veterans. In a similar vein, a postsecondary system tuition policy might apply only to its institutions, while the state’s other system has yet to craft an in-state tuition policy for veterans and dependents. In addition, institutions that are not part of a higher education system will have to ensure they are in compliance with the federal law. ŠŠ A  pply to the timeframe for qualified individuals to enroll in higher education institutions and receive in-state tuition rates? In general, eligible individuals can enroll at a postsecondary institution within three years of discharge from a period of active duty service of at least 90 days or of a servicemember’s death in the line of duty under the Choice Act. Some state and system policies place limits on the time periods for which veterans or their dependents can take advantage of in-state tuition rates. For example, a state policy may indicate that eligibility for in-state tuition benefits expires one year after a veteran is discharged from active duty, or veterans must have been on active duty for a time period longer than 90 days before in-state tuition benefits are offered. In these cases, state or system policies will need to be adjusted to remain eligible for participation in the Choice Act covered education benefit programs. ŠŠ A  void residency requirements for individuals covered under the Choice Act that would prevent eligibility for in-state tuition rates? The Choice Act indicates that qualifying veterans and dependents are eligible for in-state tuition rates and fees regardless of their formal state of residency at the time of enrollment. The law does create an exception for education courses to be approved for reimbursement at institutions that require a covered individual to demonstrate intent to establish residency to receive in- state tuition. Some current policies, however, require individuals to previously have been residents of or have lived in the state to receive in-state tuition rates. ECS POLICY ANALYSIS 4  EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES WWW.ECS.ORG ŠŠ A  void requiring a waiting period before veterans or their dependents are eligible for in-state tuition rates? The federal law allows qualifying individuals to enroll at campuses and receive in-state tuition as soon as they become eligible. Under some existing state or system policies, veterans may have to wait a year after being discharged from active duty to be eligible for in-state tuition rates and fees or their dependents may face barriers to receiving tuition benefits within the timeframe specified by the Choice Act. Roles for state, postsecondary system and institutional leaders State, postsecondary system and institutional leaders should review the requirements of the Choice Act and determine whether they will have to revise their existing or pending in-state tuition policies or draft new policies to be in compliance with federal law. For their part, states must ensure all public postsecondary institutions that accept funding under the two Department of Veterans Affairs programs charge in-state tuition and fees to the covered individuals by the July 2015 deadline. The VA recommends that, “to ensure compliance, states should consider offering in-state tuition and fees to all individuals eligible for benefits under the Post-9/11 and MGIB- AD programs.”6 Well before the July deadline, state policymakers and higher education agencies should clearly communicate the Choice Act requirements and provide necessary guidance to system and institutional leaders and staff. Higher education systems and institutions must be in full compliance with the Choice Act by July 2015 before the VA will issue payments under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and the MGIB-AD programs. The agency will begin making payments for terms, quarters or semesters that begin on or after the date that the institution’s policy takes effect. System and institutional leaders also should ensure that all current and future student veterans and their dependents are aware of and can easily take advantage of the in-state tuition benefits, if they are eligible. While state and education leaders have an incentive to ensure their policies meet the requirements under the Choice Act of 2014, the law also offers a potential avenue to expand educational opportunities for the nation’s veterans and their families, and to help achieve a state’s college attainment and economic development goals. ECS POLICY ANALYSIS 5  EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES WWW.ECS.ORG APPENDIX Data Snapshot: Veteran population ŠŠ Total = 21,791,593 (for 50 states and the District of Columbia, as of September 2014) ŠŠ T op 10 highest population states: California, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, Virginia, Georgia, North Carolina and Illinois; Range = 1,851,470 to 721,575 ŠŠ Range for all states: 1,851,470 (California) to 29,825 (D.C.) Veteran Population by State: Fiscal Year 2014 WA NH MT VT ME ND OR MN ID WI MA SD NY WY MI RI IA PA CT NE NJ NV IL OH UT IN DE CO KS WV VA MD CA MO KY NC OK TN AZ NM AR SC MS AL GA LA TX FL 950,001–1,795,455 AK 650,001–950,000 HI 350,001–650,000 200,001–350,000 PUERTO RICO 100,001–200,000 31,166–100,000 Source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Table 6L: VETPOP2014 “Living Veterans by State, Age Group, Gender, 2013-2014” (Washington, D.C., October 2014), http://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/Maps/VetPop_State.pdf. ECS POLICY ANALYSIS 6  EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES WWW.ECS.ORG Percent Change in Veteran Population by State The total veteran population decreased 17% between 2000 and 2014 WA NH MT VT ME ND OR MN ID WI MA SD NY WY MI RI IA PA CT NE NJ NV IL OH UT IN DE CO KS WV VA MD CA MO KY NC OK TN AZ NM AR SC MS AL GA LA TX FL Loss -35.7 to -21.0% AK -20.9 to -11.0% HI -10.9 to -6.0% -5.9 to -1.0% PUERTO RICO -0.9 to 0.0% 0.1 to 5.0% Gain 5.1 to 6.7% Source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Table 6L: “Percent Change in Veteran Population by State” (Washington, D.C., October 2014), http://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/Maps/VetPop11_PercentChange2000_2014.pdf. ECS POLICY ANALYSIS 7  EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES WWW.ECS.ORG ENDNOTES .S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014: Section 702 of the Choice Act (Washington, D.C.) 1 U http://www.benefits.va.gov/GIBILL/docs/factsheets/Section_702_Factsheet.pdf. 2 Ibid. .S. Department of Veterans Affairs, One Million Now Benefit from Post-9/11 GI Bill (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 3 U November 8, 2013), http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=2490. .S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Benefits for Veterans Education (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, September 2014), 4 U http://www.benefits.va.gov/REPORTS/abr/ABR-Education-FY13-09262014.pdf. 5 E ducation Commission of the States, State Policy Database—Postsecondary Students—Military (Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States, January 2015) http://b5.caspio.com/dp.asp?AppKey=b7f93000695b3d0d5abb4b68bd14&id=a0y70000000yLmYAAU. 6 Ibid. Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014: Section 702 of the Choice Act. Authors Mary Fulton is a policy analyst for the Education Commission of the States. Contact her at [email protected]. She is well known for her considerable collection of scarves and shawls (more than 70 and still growing), as well as her silver jewelry. Brian A. Sponsler, EdD is director of the ECS Postsecondary and Workforce Institute.Contact him at [email protected]. A recent in-migrant to the great state of Colorado, Brian spent a decade in Washington, D.C. and is a native of the Pacific Northwest. The authors would also like to thank and acknowledge Dr. David Vacchi, strategic coordinator for the Student Veteran Resource Center at UMass- Amherst, who provided valuable expertise and feedback on this brief. ©2015 by the Education Commission of the States (ECS). All rights reserved. ECS encourages its readers to share FOLLOW US our information with others. To request permission to reprint or excerpt some of our material, please contact ECS at 303.299.3609 or e-mail [email protected]. EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES | 700 BROADWAY SUITE 810, DENVER, CO 80203 ECS POLICY ANALYSIS 8