EAPP Reviewer PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by AngelicIambicPentameter4032
Glan School of Arts and Trades
Tags
Summary
This document provides advice on crafting arguments, specifically focusing on persuasive writing techniques. It delves into the use of various methods in constructing arguments for diverse audiences and how to address different viewpoints in academic writing.
Full Transcript
Which method— definition, explication, or clarification—would be least effective when explaining a highly technical term to a general audience, and why? ANSWER: Explication, because it may overwhelm the audience with "Resilience refers to the ability to recover quickly f...
Which method— definition, explication, or clarification—would be least effective when explaining a highly technical term to a general audience, and why? ANSWER: Explication, because it may overwhelm the audience with "Resilience refers to the ability to recover quickly from difficulties. For instance, it is like a tree bending under strong wind but not breaking. This is important because it helps individuals adapt and thrive despite challenges." Which method(s) are used in this explanation? You are preparing a speech for a mixed audience of professionals and students about "ethical leadership." Which method would you prioritize to ensure everyone understands the concept? ANSWER: Start with a clear definition and then use clarification. If you were tasked to explain "critical thinking" in a research article, which combination of methods would provide the most comprehensive understanding? ANSWER Definition, explication, and clarification What is the primary difference between explication and clarification in academic writing? ANSWER: Explication involves breaking down a concept, while clarification ensures the reader understands the context. A student claims that combining all three methods (definition, explication, clarification) in one paragraph is unnecessary. What is the most logical counterargument? ANSWER: Combining methods ensures clarity and engages diverse audience. A writer in a manifesto uses this argument: "History has shown us time and again that revolutions are born out of inequality and oppression. The time to rise is now." Which strategy is the writer using to persuade the audience? ANSWER: Referring to historical precedents Why might an academic writer use clarification in addition to a formal definition when explaining a term? ANSWER: To ensure the reader understands the broader application A manifesto concludes with this argument: "Join us in creating a future where no one is left behind. Together, we can build a society based on fairness and equality." How does this conclusion align with the purpose of a manifesto? ANSWER: It uses a call to action to inspire collective Two manifestoes argue for increased funding in healthcare: Manifesto A: "Healthcare is a basic human right. We cannot ignore the suffering of millions who lack access to proper care." Manifesto B: "Investing in healthcare leads to a more productive society and a stronger economy." How might combining these arguments strengthen the overall message? ANSWER: It merges ethical and logical appeals, addressing a broader The following situations allow the speaker to use ethical appeal, EXCEPT ANSWER: A commercial for a certain detergent claim that you should use it because studies have shown that it leaves colors 20 percent brighter than other detergents and costs 25 percent less than other brands. Consider the following argument: "We must shift to renewable energy. According to a 2023 report by the International Energy Agency (IEA), renewable energy sources accounted for 90% of global power capacity growth in 2022, proving their scalability and effectiveness." What could weaken this argument? ANSWER: The writer does not address possible challenges of renewable energy. If you are unsure about your audience, what should you do? ANSWER: Which piece of evidence could BEST be used to defend this claim? The government SHOULD decide what students eat for lunch. ANSWER: School canteen should prepare healthy lunch for students. You find two credible sources with conflicting statistics supporting your argument. What is the best way to handle this? ANSWER: Present both sources, explain the differences, and justify why you favor one over the other. In your position paper, how should you address the opposing viewpoint? ANSWER: Acknowledge it and then explain why it is less valid than your position. If you were tasked with writing a position paper on a controversial issue, how would you ensure your argument is balanced yet persuasive? ANSWER: Address opposing views respectfully You’ve written a strong position paper, but your teacher says your tone is too aggressive. How do you revise it? ANSWER: Replace strong language with neutral, respectful phrasing while Your progress report on a community development project shows delays due to unexpected weather conditions. How should you present this information? ANSWER: Include the delays in the findings If a report fails to achieve its intended objective, what is the most likely structural issue? ANSWER: The report does not align its Why is it important to tailor the structure of a report to its audience? ANSWER: To ensure the report aligns A client requests a research report on customer satisfaction but only provides limited survey data. How should you address this issue in the report? ANSWER: Acknowledge the limited data in How would placing recommendations at the beginning of a report rather than at the end affect its usability? ANSWER: It would help decision-makers A technical report on a new product includes highly detailed engineering specifications. The management team reviewing the report finds it difficult to understand. What structural change would make the report more accessible? ANSWER: How could the structure of a progress report be adapted to ensure it is actionable for a project team? ANSWER: By focusing on future steps, timelines, and challenges instead If a reader struggles to understand the findings of a research report, what structural adjustment might improve clarity? ANSWER: After distributing your survey, you notice a low response rate. What revision strategy is most effective for increasing participation? ANSWER: Offer incentives and shorten You have been tasked with writing an incident report about a workplace accident. The affected employee claims the equipment was faulty, but maintenance records suggest otherwise. How should you structure your report? ANSWER: Present both the employee’s claims A colleague designs a survey with leading questions, such as "Don’t you think the company is doing a great job?" What revision would make this question unbiased? ANSWER: Change it to: "How would you rate During a survey pretest, participants skip a question asking, "What are your thoughts on the company's recent changes?" How should you revise this question? ANSWER: In a survey about social media usage, respondents frequently misunderstand the question, "How often do you engage on social platforms?" What revision could improve clarity? ANSWER: Replace "engage" with a specific term, such as "post, comment, or like.” You realize after distributing a survey that a crucial demographic question was left out. What is the best course of action? ANSWER: Create a follow-up survey focused