🎧 New: AI-Generated Podcasts Turn your study notes into engaging audio conversations. Learn more

Class 8 Methodological Debates PDF

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Summary

This document is an overview of methodological debates in sociology, specifically focusing on positivism, interpretivism, and critique. It describes various perspectives and approaches, including quantitative and qualitative research methods. The document also provides a historical context and presents key figures within the field.

Full Transcript

CLASS 8 / Part III: Methodological Debates: Positivism, Interpretivism and Critique Ø SUMMARY: Ø Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique – preliminary clarifications Ø Positivism – methodological premises Ø Positivist research methods Ø Positivism: quantitative research methods CLASS 8: Met...

CLASS 8 / Part III: Methodological Debates: Positivism, Interpretivism and Critique Ø SUMMARY: Ø Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique – preliminary clarifications Ø Positivism – methodological premises Ø Positivist research methods Ø Positivism: quantitative research methods CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Methodological debates: Ø Three very broad methodological options and positions emerged in regard to all of these problems: positivism, critique, interpretivism CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø main heirs of the Enlightenment foundations of the social sciences - they provide a sociology that reflects the “canonical” reading of modernity and sociology Ø From the start, academic sociology was also the ideology of modernity, not simply its analysis Ø The distinction between political ideology and social science is blurred Ø This has become the official modality of sociology, propagating modernity’s selfunderstanding CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø Modernity’s self-understanding: Ø 1. Modernity as absolute break / revolution in human history ushering in progress, evolution, development – whether “actual” or “potential” Ø 2. Human history per se is an evolutionary, linear development towards progress (embodied by modernity) CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø Techniques and methods of the natural sciences to shore up the modern selfunderstanding (especially positivism) Ø There are various degrees of overlap between positivism and critique: Ø structural-functionalist evolutionism (especially positivism) vs. radical socialism (especially critique), and their “paradoxical” combination CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø structural-functionalist evolutionism: Ø structure/ structuralism: Ø every system has a structure Ø human society can be best understood if one uncovers the underlying structure Ø structures are underneath the surfaces of things or meanings, they are invisible but they are no less real Ø structure determines the position of each element in the whole CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø structural-functionalist evolutionism: Ø Function / functionalism: Ø all human societies are made up of social functions: i.e. social roles and norms, traditions, institutions, division of labour etc. Ø Social functions keep societies together – solidarity, stability - things exist in society because they fulfil a specific function Ø Societies evolve like organisms (analogy from biology) CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø The precursors and the classics: Ø Saint-Simon, Auguste Comte, Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim Ø First generations: Ø Positivism: Talcott Parsons (1902 - 1979), Karl Popper (1902 – 1994); critique: Theodor Adorno (1903 – 1969) and Jean-Paul Sartre (1905 – 1980) CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø Second generations: Ø Jean Baudrillard (1929 – 2007), Jürgen Habermas (1929 - ), Pierre Bourdieu (1930 – 2002) and Jacques Derrida (1930 – 2004), Anthony Giddens (1938) Ø Third generations: Ø Jeffrey Alexander (1947), Craig Calhoun (1952), Luc Boltanski (1940) CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø 1. “Classical sociology” in the tradition of Durkheim Ø 2. the “classical synthesis” in sociology achieved by Talcott Parsons – structural functionalism – based on the identification of the positions of Weber and Durkheim – methodologically no real significance Ø 3. The “neoclassical synthesis” between structuralfunctionalist evolutionism and radical socialism achieved in the works of Bourdieu, Giddens, Alexander, or Habermas CLASS 8: Methodological debates Ø Positivism and critique Ø The latest contemporary developments (third generation) go along some form of synthesis between Durkheim, Weber and Marx CLASS 8: Positivism Ø Methodologically, positivism refers to: Ø The social world is “objective” in the same way that the natural world is objective Ø the application of natural science methods and their understandings of what is scientific truth to the study of human societies CLASS 8: Positivism Ø Methodologically, positivism refers to: Ø the purpose of scientific research in sociology is to discover objective laws of social behaviour based on the scientific method (natural science) Ø The imposition of a non-participatory form of knowledge in the study of human societies Ø Defining and categorizing - the absence of experience as a problem CLASS 8: Positivist research methods Ø Positivist research methods: Ø 1. Quantitative research methods: Ø research that relies on numerical and statistical data for calculating findings. Ø Quantitative research is typically used in cases when one is trying to apply a natural science model of explanation, i.e. laws / patters / regularities of social behaviour, of social processes etc. CLASS 8: Positivist research methods Ø Positivist research methods: Ø 2. Qualitative research methods: Ø Research that relies on qualitative & interpretative aspects of social relations; Ø the data is often textual and contextual, examples including interviews transcripts and ethnographic field notes through participatory observation; data takes the form of words CLASS 8: Positivist research methods Ø Positivist research methods: Ø 2. Qualitative research methods: Ø a) Qualitative research often follows on a methodological level the model of the natural sciences: Ø the scientific method with the human as “object” of study provides the criteria for what is a valid truth claim; Ø in this sense it falls within the selfunderstandings of the natural sciences CLASS 8: Positivist research methods Ø Positivist research methods: Ø 2. Qualitative research methods: Ø b) Qualitative research can also lie outside the confines of positivism strictly speaking: Ø studies which use the “ethnographic research” or “participatory observation” and follow a nonpositivist understanding of what is a scientific truth claim (see notes and classes on “Interpretivism”) CLASS 8: Positivist research methods Ø Social theory (understanding) / qualitative research methods: Ø Theoretical framework based on empirical evidence that is used to organize concepts and explains why society or some aspects of it functions as it does. Ø Explanatory theory (explaining) / quantitative research methods: Ø Theoretical framework that has one or more causal hypotheses suggesting that a particular independent variable causes a particular effect on the dependent variable. CLASS 8: Positivist research methods Ø Positivist research methods: Ø Positivist sociological research sometimes combines the use of quantitative and qualitative research methods Ø Example: Ø statistical quantitative research using questionnaires often employ ‘pilot-interviews’ (qualitative research methods) in the preliminary phase of the research Ø Pilot-interviews on small samples can provide better understandings of what to ask and how to frame the questions in the questionnaires CLASS 8: Positivism / Quantitative research methods Ø Concept: Ø mental construct that represents some part of the world in a simplified form; it might also be a category or a classification, such as sex, race, social class Ø Variable: Ø A concept whose value changes from case to case; the changing value is noted by an indicator; for example: “income” as indicator of the variable class CLASS 8: Positivism / Quantitative research methods Ø Correlation: Ø The relationship between two variables whose values change together Ø Correlation does not equal causation; the correlation between two variables can be caused by a third variable Ø Independent variable: Ø The cause: variable that causes change in another variable Ø Dependent variable: Ø The effect: variable that changes its value as a result of an independent variable CLASS 8 – Positivism Ø Bibliography: Ø “Chapter 2” Ø “A Contemporary Introduction to Sociology. Culture and Society in Transition.; 3rd Edition; Routledge (2018), by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Kenneth Thompson, Laura Desfor Edles, Moshoula Capous-Desyllas (eds.)

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser