Minimal Pairs PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by MesmerizedMoldavite7389
ANTH/LING
Tags
Summary
This document explains minimal pairs in English, providing examples of how slight sound changes can alter the meaning of words. It explores the concept of allophones and phonemes, and the role of auditory perception in understanding sounds in the English language.
Full Transcript
Minimal Pairs How do we determine whether two sounds are allophones of the same phoneme or separate phonemes? The easiest way is to look for a minimal pair. Two words form a minimal pair when they vary by only a single sound. These are minimal pairs in English: [but] - [sut] [splæt] - [splæʃ]...
Minimal Pairs How do we determine whether two sounds are allophones of the same phoneme or separate phonemes? The easiest way is to look for a minimal pair. Two words form a minimal pair when they vary by only a single sound. These are minimal pairs in English: [but] - [sut] [splæt] - [splæʃ] [khʌp] - [khʌb] [bæt] - [bat] 13 Minimal Pairs: Be Careful! If two words differ by more than one sound then they are not minimal pairs—even if they sound very similar! The following pairs of English words are not minimal pairs: [blæst] - [pæst] [mʌg] - [gʌm] [hæm] - [spæm] 14 Why do minimal pairs matter? Minimal Pair: English speakers do not think that [ph] and [b] are the same sound, so changing that sound alone can trigger a change in meaning. [bɛt] - [phɛt] Changing [ph] to [b] triggers a change in meaning [ph] and [b] represent different sounds in English! ù [b] is an allophone of the phoneme /b/ ù [ph] is an allophone of the phoneme /p/ 15 Why do minimal pairs maLer? An example of no minimal pair: English speakers do consider [p] and [ph] to be the same basic sound—they are both allophones of /p/! [spɪn] vs. [sphɪn] Substituting an aspirated [p] for the unaspirated [p] doesn’t cause a change in meaning This tells us that we are dealing with allophones of the same phoneme [p] is an allophone of the phoneme /p/ [ph] is an allophone of the phoneme /p/ 16