114 Quorum (New) PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by DecisiveGreatWallOfChina1467
Tags
Summary
This document discusses quorum in distributed systems. Quorum is the minimum number of servers required for a distributed operation to be successful. It's crucial for maintaining data consistency and availability in such systems.
Full Transcript
114 Quorum (New) Let's learn about Quorum and its usage. Background * In Distributed Systems, data is replicated across multiple servers for fault tolerance and high * * *...
114 Quorum (New) Let's learn about Quorum and its usage. Background * In Distributed Systems, data is replicated across multiple servers for fault tolerance and high * * * * * * * * availability. * == * Once a system decides to maintain multiple copies of data, another problem arises: how to make * * * * * *** sure that all replicas are consistent, *** == * i.e., if they all have the latest copy of the data * *** *** * * * and that all clients see the same view of the data? * * * * * Solution In a distributed environment, a quorum is the minimum number of servers on which a distributed **~ ~** *** operation needs to be performed successfully before declaring the operation's overall success. *** * E.g. Suppose a database is replicated on five machines. In that case, quorum refers to the minimum * * * * * * * number of machines that perform the same action (commit or abort) for a given transaction in order * * * * * to decide the final operation (i.e. commit or rollback) for that transaction. So, in a set of 5 machines, ** ** * three machines form the majority quorum, and if they agree, we will commit that operation. Quorum * * *** enforces the consistency requirement needed for distributed operations. *** * In systems with multiple replicas, there is a possibility that the user reads inconsistent data. For * * ** ** * * example, when there are three replicas, R1 , R2 , and R3 in a cluster, and a user writes value v1 to * ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` replica R1. Then another user reads from replica R2 or R3 which are still behind R1 and thus will not ` ` ` ` ` ` * * ` ` have the value v1 , so the second user will not get the consistent state of data. ` ` * * *** What value should we choose for a quorum? More than half of the number of nodes in the *** *** cluster: (N/2+1) where N is the total number of nodes in the cluster, for example: *** ` ` ` ` In a 5-node cluster, three nodes must be online to have a majority. In a 4-node cluster, three nodes must be online to have a majority. * With 5-node, the system can afford two node failures, whereas, with 4-node, it can afford only * *** *** * * * * * one node failure. * * Because of this logic, it is recommended to always have an odd number of total nodes in * *** the cluster. *** == ** Quorum is achieved when nodes follow the below protocol: R + W > N , where: ** ` ` *** *** == == — N = nodes in the quorum group ` ` == == — W = minimum write nodes ` ` == == — R = minimum read nodes ` ` == == ** If a distributed system follows R + W > N rule, then every read will see at least one copy of the ` ` latest value written. **== * For example, a common configuration could be (N=3, W=2, R=2) to ensure strong consistency. * ** ` ` ** Here are a couple of other examples: ` (N=3, W=1, R=3) : fast write (since less write nodes), slow read, not very durable ` * * * * * * *** *** *~~ ~~* ` (N=3, W=3, R=1) : slow write, fast read (since less read nodes), durable ` * * * * * * * * *~ Clarification: the more write nodes, the slower the writes. The more read nodes the slower the ~ reads. * ⠀The following two things should be kept in mind before deciding read/write quorum: ** ** == **.. R=1 and W=N ` ` ` ` ~ full replication (write-all, read-one): undesirable when servers can be ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * * * * * unavailable because writes are not guaranteed to complete. * * ***== == **~ Best performance (throughput/availability) when 1 < r < w < n , because reads are more ~ ` ` * * * * * * * * * frequent than writes in most applications * **== ⠀How It Works ~ Majority-Based Quorum: ~ * The most common type of quorum where an operation requires a majority (more than half) of ** ** * * * the nodes to agree or participate. * For instance, in a system with 5 nodes, at least 3 must agree for a decision to be made. * ~ Read and Write Quorums: ~ *** For read and write operations, different quorum sizes can be defined. * * *** * For example, a system might require a write quorum of 3 nodes and a read quorum of 2 nodes in * * * * * a 5-node cluster. Use Cases * Distributed Databases * *** Ensuring consistency in a database cluster, where multiple nodes might hold copies of the *** * * * * * same data. * * Cluster Management * *** In server clusters, a quorum decides which nodes form the 'active' cluster, especially * * * ** * important for avoiding 'split-brain' scenarios where a cluster might be divided into two parts, * * * * * * each believing it is the active cluster. * * Consensus Protocols * In algorithms like Paxos or Raft, a quorum is crucial for achieving consensus among distributed * * * * nodes regarding the state of the system or the outcome of an operation. * Paxos * * Paxos is a foundational consensus algorithm designed to ensure agreement among nodes in a distributed system, even in the presence of failures. It works by having nodes take on roles such as proposers, acceptors, and learners to propose, vote on, and finalize values in a series of phases. While theoretically robust and fault-tolerant, Paxos is often considered complex to implement due to its abstract nature and intricate message-passing requirements. It is primarily used in systems requiring high reliability and strong consistency, such as distributed databases. * * Raft * * Raft is a consensus algorithm created to be simpler and more understandable than Paxos, enabling easier implementation in distributed systems. It operates by electing a single leader to manage client requests, replicate logs to follower nodes, and ensure consistent agreement on system state. Raft divides its process into leader election, log replication, and safety enforcement, providing clear roles for nodes as leaders, followers, or candidates. Its clarity and practicality have made it a popular choice for managing consistency in modern systems like Kubernetes and etcd. * Advantages 1. == ** Fault Tolerance: Allows the system to tolerate a certain number of failures while still operating ** * correctly. *== 2. == ** Consistency: Helps maintain data consistency across distributed nodes. ** * * * *== 3. == ** Availability: Increases the availability of the system by allowing operations to proceed as long ** * * * * * as the quorum condition is met. *== Challenges 1. == ** Network Partitions: In cases of network failures, forming a quorum might be challenging, ** * * * impacting system availability. ** *** == 2. == *** Performance Overhead: Achieving a quorum, especially in large clusters, can introduce latency * ** * * *** *** in decision-making processes. == 3. == ** Complexity: Implementing and managing quorum-based systems can be complex, particularly in ** * dynamic environments with frequent node or network changes. *== Conclusion *** Quorum is a fundamental concept in distributed systems, playing a crucial role in ensuring *** * consistency, reliability, and availability in environments where multiple nodes work together. * * * == * While it enhances fault tolerance , it also introduces additional complexity and requires careful * * *== == * *== == * design and management to balance consistency, availability, and performance. *==