20 Questions
What is the foundational framework for reasoning with propositions and connectives like AND
, OR
, and NOT
?
Propositional logic
Which inference rule states that if P
implies Q
(P → Q
) and P
is true, then Q
must also be true?
Modus Ponens
What is the purpose of inference rules in natural deduction systems?
To govern how we can move from premises to conclusions in a valid way
In Disjunction Elimination, what happens if NOT P
is true?
Q
is also true
What is an assumption in natural deduction?
A statement we temporarily accept as true to derive other conclusions
How is an implication defined in natural deduction?
A statement of the form P → Q
What is a direct proof?
Proving a statement by deriving it from given premises using inference rules
Which proof strategy involves deriving a contradiction?
Indirect proof
How can an implication be used in deriving a conclusion?
By replacing the antecedent with an assumption
In natural deduction, what does 'Negation Elimination' refer to?
Logic rule stating if 'NOT P' is true, then 'P' is false
What is the primary focus of propositional logic?
Handling logical combinations of true or false statements
Which inference rule asserts that if A
implies B
and A
is true, then B
must be true?
Modus ponens
In natural deduction, what is the purpose of assumptions?
To provide temporary truths for deriving conclusions
Which proof strategy involves temporarily assuming the negation of the statement to be proved and deriving a contradiction?
Indirect proof
What is the purpose of natural deduction systems?
To analyze arguments through contradiction
In natural deduction, what does a direct proof involve?
Proving the statement directly using inference rules and assumptions
What is the role of implications in logical statements?
To establish the relationship between propositions
Which proof strategy involves showing that a statement's negation leads to a contradiction?
Proof by contradiction
What is the key function of an assumption in natural deduction?
To provide a basis for contradiction proofs
How do implications contribute to deriving conclusions in logic?
By establishing connections between propositions
Study Notes
Unlocking the Power of Natural Deduction: A Guide to Propositional Logic, Inference Rules, Assumptions, and Implications
Imagine tackling complex math problems or debating philosophical ideas without the crutch of the internet. That's the objective spirit of natural deduction systems, where reasoning is driven by logical systems alone, generating proofs in a structured, analytical way. Let's dive into the heart of natural deduction, exploring its foundations in propositional logic, inference rules, assumptions, and implications.
Propositional Logic
Propositional logic is a cornerstone of natural deduction, providing a framework to reason with propositions and connectives like AND
, OR
, and NOT
. Propositional logic is based on the premise that propositions can take on the truth values of TRUE
or FALSE
.
Inference Rules
Inference rules are the bread and butter of natural deduction systems. These rules govern how we can move from premises to conclusions, creating valid and sound proofs. Some common inference rules include:

Modus Ponens: If
P
impliesQ
(P → Q
) andP
is true, thenQ
must also be true. 
Conjunction Elimination: If
P
andQ
are true (P ∧ Q
), then eitherP
orQ
can be used as a premise in a deduction. 
Disjunction Elimination: If either
P
orQ
is true (P ∨ Q
), thenP
can be used as a premise in a deduction, or ifNOT P
is true, thenQ
must be true. 
Negation Elimination: If
NOT P
is true (¬P
), thenP
must be false.
Assumptions and Implications
Natural deduction systems rely on assumptions and implications to build proofs.
Assumptions
An assumption is a statement that we temporarily accept as true in order to derive other conclusions. In natural deduction, we write assumptions as a line followed by a colon (:
) and the proposition that we are assuming. For example:
A : P
Implications
An implication is a statement of the form P → Q
, which means that if P
is true, then Q
must be true. Implications are a fundamental part of natural deduction, and they can be used in a variety of ways. For example, we can derive Q
from an assumption A : P → Q
by replacing P
with an assumption:
A : P → Q
B : P
∴ C : Q (from A and B using modus ponens)
Proof Strategies
Proof strategies are the methods we use to actually construct proofs in natural deduction. While there are many strategies available, we'll look at two main ones here: direct proof and contradiction (or reductio ad absurdum).
Direct Proof
A direct proof is a method of proving a statement by deriving it from a set of given premises using inference rules. For example, to prove P → (Q → P)
, we could use a direct proof:
1. A : P → (Q → P) (given premise)
2. B : Q (assumption for the inner implication)
3. C : P (from A and B using modus ponens)
4. D : Q → P (from B and C using implication elimination)
5. E : P (assumption for the outer implication)
6. F : Q (from A and E using modus ponens)
7. G : P → (Q → P) (from D and E using implication introduction)
Contradiction Proof
A contradiction proof, also known as reductio ad absurdum, is a strategy that involves deriving a contradiction and then using that contradiction to show our original statement is false. For example, to prove ¬(P ∧ ¬P)
, we could use a contradiction proof:
1. A : P ∧ ¬P (assumption for contradiction)
2. B : P (from A using conjunction elimination)
3. C : ¬P (from A using conjunction elimination)
4. D : P → (Q v R) (assumption for the indirect proof)
5. E : Q (assumption for the case)
6. F : P → (Q v R) (from D and E using implication elimination)
7. G : Q v R (from B and F using modus ponens)
8. H : ¬Q (assumption for the case)
9. I : Q v R (from H and D using implication elimination)
10. J : Q (from G and H using disjunction elimination)
11. K : ¬Q ∧ Q (from J and H using conjunction introduction)
12. L : ¬(P ∧ ¬P) (from K using double negation)
13. L' : P ∧ ¬P (from A using contradiction)
14. L" : ¬(P ∧ ¬P) (from L' using double negation)
15. Contradiction: L = L"
Since we have derived a contradiction, we can conclude that our initial assumption, `P ∧ ¬P`, is false. Thus `¬(P ∧ ¬P)`.
## Conclusion
Natural deduction systems are a powerful and intuitive way to reason with logical systems. By understanding propositional logic, inference rules, assumptions, and implications, we can apply the methods of natural deduction to construct proofs in a structured, analytical way. Regardless of whether you're a professional logician or simply a curious learner, the beauty of natural deduction lies in its ability to reveal the underlying structure of complex arguments.
Delve into the world of natural deduction to understand propositional logic, inference rules, assumptions, and proof strategies. Explore how to construct valid proofs using techniques like direct proof and contradiction. Whether you're a logic enthusiast or a curious learner, uncover the foundations of structured reasoning with natural deduction.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free