When more than one person was engaged in an action that resulted in injury or property damage to others and neither one accepts a share of the responsibility, the courts resolve th... When more than one person was engaged in an action that resulted in injury or property damage to others and neither one accepts a share of the responsibility, the courts resolve this dispute in the following manner (1 mark). a) The courts appoint an arbitrator to apportion the liability among the responsible parties. b) The courts will wait until the responsible parties have reached an agreement to equally share the liability. c) The courts hold each person liable for the full amount of the damages. d) The judge will transfer the case to the criminal court to impose punitive sanctions against the responsible parties.
Understand the Problem
The question is asking how courts resolve disputes when multiple parties are involved in a situation where neither accepts responsibility for the injury or property damage. It presents four possible answers regarding the legal approaches courts might take.
Answer
The courts hold each person liable for the full amount of the damages.
The courts hold each person liable for the full amount of the damages.
Answer for screen readers
The courts hold each person liable for the full amount of the damages.
More Information
In situations where multiple parties are responsible but do not accept responsibility, the principle of 'joint and several liability' is often applied. This means each party can be held liable for the full amount of the damages.
Tips
Be sure to understand the concept of joint and several liability, as it is crucial in multiple-party liability cases.
Sources
- joint and several liability | Wex - Law.Cornell.Edu - law.cornell.edu
- Apportionment of Liability - Corporate Counsel - FindLaw - corporate.findlaw.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
