What was the main argument of the states challenging Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the main argument presented by states that challenged Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, requiring an understanding of legal and political discussions surrounding this issue.
Answer
The states argued it violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
The main argument of the states challenging Trump's executive order was that ending birthright citizenship violates the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States.
Answer for screen readers
The main argument of the states challenging Trump's executive order was that ending birthright citizenship violates the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States.
More Information
The Fourteenth Amendment states that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens, a principle that has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in previous rulings.
Tips
A common mistake is misunderstanding the Fourteenth Amendment's citizenship clause and its interpretation by the courts.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
