True or false: The evidence must be relevant, reliable, and fair to be considered admissible in court.
Understand the Problem
The question is asking whether evidence must meet certain criteria, specifically being relevant, reliable, and fair, to be considered admissible in court.
Answer
True.
True. For evidence to be admissible in court, it generally must be relevant and reliable. Although the word 'fair' isn't typically used in legal criteria, relevance and reliability are crucial.
Answer for screen readers
True. For evidence to be admissible in court, it generally must be relevant and reliable. Although the word 'fair' isn't typically used in legal criteria, relevance and reliability are crucial.
More Information
Evidence must be relevant to the case, meaning it can make a fact more or less probable, and reliable, indicating that it can be depended upon for accuracy. While 'fairness' is not typically a stated requirement, the evidence must not be overly prejudicial or misleading.
Tips
Common mistakes include assuming that all relevant evidence is admissible or neglecting the balance between probative value and potential prejudice when determining admissibility.
Sources
- Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Law Cases - Justia - justia.com
- Admissibility of relevant evidence in California and federal court - losangelescriminallawyer.pro
- Evidence: The Concept of 'Admissibility' - FindLaw - findlaw.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
