The Paul Ingram case is an example of: A) The dangers of suggestive questioning B) The role of genetics in criminal behavior C) The effectiveness of recovered memories D) The relia... The Paul Ingram case is an example of: A) The dangers of suggestive questioning B) The role of genetics in criminal behavior C) The effectiveness of recovered memories D) The reliability of eyewitness testimony
Understand the Problem
The question is asking which option best describes the Paul Ingram case, focusing on aspects related to psychology and the legal system. We need to evaluate each option to determine what the case exemplifies.
Answer
A) The dangers of suggestive questioning
The final answer is A) The dangers of suggestive questioning
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is A) The dangers of suggestive questioning
More Information
The Paul Ingram case is a well-known example of suggestive questioning leading to false confessions. Ingram was subjected to intense and suggestive interrogation techniques, which led him to confess to crimes he later recanted.
Tips
A common mistake is confusing suggestive questioning with other factors like the reliability of eyewitness testimony, which was not a significant aspect of the Ingram case.
Sources
- CRIMINAL LAW BULLETIN - dpic-cdn.org - dpic-cdn.org
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
