Some historians believe that the retraction letter discovered in 1935 is a forgery and that Rizal never actually renounced his earlier writings. Is this statement TRUE or FALSE?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking whether historians believe the retraction letter discovered in 1935 is a forgery and that Rizal never renounced his earlier writings. It requires an understanding of historical interpretations related to Rizal's life and writings.
Answer
TRUE
The final answer is TRUE.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is TRUE.
More Information
There are arguments suggesting that the retraction letter was a forgery, with some historians maintaining that Rizal did not renounce his works. This controversy remains a debated topic.
Sources
Thank you for voting!
