Kessler argues, however, that what's considered a 'normal' male or female body in these circumstances is actually the one that has been medically constructed. The natural body is t... Kessler argues, however, that what's considered a 'normal' male or female body in these circumstances is actually the one that has been medically constructed. The natural body is the one that existed prior to surgical intervention, and whose genitalia are ambiguous.
Understand the Problem
The question seems to be discussing concepts related to gender identity and the medical construction of gendered bodies, specifically the arguments made by Kessler regarding 'normal' male or female bodies versus 'natural' bodies.
Answer
Medically constructed bodies are considered 'normal'; the natural body is pre-intervention with ambiguous genitalia.
Kessler argues that what is considered a 'normal' male or female body is actually medically constructed. The 'natural' body existed prior to surgical intervention, with ambiguous genitalia.
Answer for screen readers
Kessler argues that what is considered a 'normal' male or female body is actually medically constructed. The 'natural' body existed prior to surgical intervention, with ambiguous genitalia.
More Information
Kessler's work critiques how societal norms shape medical practices around intersex individuals, viewing medical intervention as creating rather than restoring 'normality'.
Tips
A common mistake is assuming that the 'natural' body aligns with traditional gender norms.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
