How does the impeachment process differ between Sri Lanka and India?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the differences in the impeachment process between Sri Lanka and India, particularly focusing on aspects related to majority voting, parliamentary approval, judiciary involvement, and the role of the Supreme Court.
Answer
Sri Lanka uses a parliamentary select committee; India requires Parliament's involvement.
In Sri Lanka, the impeachment process of the Chief Justice involves a parliamentary select committee, which does not exercise judicial power. In India, impeachment of the Chief Justice requires a detailed process involving both houses of Parliament and follows specific constitutional provisions.
Answer for screen readers
In Sri Lanka, the impeachment process of the Chief Justice involves a parliamentary select committee, which does not exercise judicial power. In India, impeachment of the Chief Justice requires a detailed process involving both houses of Parliament and follows specific constitutional provisions.
More Information
The difference mainly arises from the lack of judicial checks in the Sri Lankan process compared to India's parliament-centric approach.
Sources
- INDIA: Does impeachment of the Chief Justice in Sri Lanka matter? - humanrights.asia
- Impeachment of Sri Lankan Chief Justice: Government must adhere... - icj.org
- SRI LANKA: Speaker's ruling has no bearing upon the substantive... - humanrights.asia
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
