Explain the differences between preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling algorithms in CPU scheduling.

Understand the Problem

The question is asking for an explanation of CPU scheduling algorithms, specifically the differences between preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling. It describes how the operating system manages process execution and how the CPU switches between processes.

Answer

Preemptive allows interruptions for high-priority runs; non-preemptive lets processes finish uninterrupted. Preemptive is more responsive but costly; non-preemptive is simpler but can cause delays.

Preemptive scheduling allows the operating system to interrupt a currently running process to prioritize and allocate CPU to a higher priority process. Non-preemptive scheduling lets a process continue until it concludes or voluntarily yields control. Preemptive scheduling improves responsiveness at the cost of higher context-switch overhead, whereas non-preemptive scheduling is simpler with lower overhead but can cause delays for lower-priority processes.

Answer for screen readers

Preemptive scheduling allows the operating system to interrupt a currently running process to prioritize and allocate CPU to a higher priority process. Non-preemptive scheduling lets a process continue until it concludes or voluntarily yields control. Preemptive scheduling improves responsiveness at the cost of higher context-switch overhead, whereas non-preemptive scheduling is simpler with lower overhead but can cause delays for lower-priority processes.

More Information

Preemptive scheduling is often used in real-time operating systems where response time is critical. Non-preemptive scheduling is easier to implement and is typically used in simpler or older systems.

Tips

One common mistake is to confuse the terms 'preemptive' and 'non-preemptive' with 'priority'; a high-priority process in non-preemptive scheduling still has to wait for its turn.

Thank you for voting!
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser