Distinguishing the facts: The process judges use to decide which case is the binding precedent; Apply past decisions while considering the unique qualities of the new case. Bijural... Distinguishing the facts: The process judges use to decide which case is the binding precedent; Apply past decisions while considering the unique qualities of the new case. Bijuralism: Expresses the civil law and common law traditions coexist in Canada, does not exclude recognition of other rules such as international law, demonstrate respect for other legal cultures. Common law courts: The 3 historical English courts (Common pleas, Kings bench, Exchequer court) was discovered in the customs and traditions of the people. Common law borrows from Roman civil law. Canon/church law: The legal system of the catholic church from which common law drew principles relating to families and estates. Law merchant: Rules developed by the merchant guilds and the source of common law relating to negotiable instruments such as cheques and promissory notes. Court of chancery/Equity: Dealt with matters that could not be handled fairly by the common law courts. Equity: refers to the principles upon fairness to relieve the harshness of the common law and the value left in an asset after subtracting what the owner owes. Trust: One party holds property for another. Statutes/Legislation: Law in the form of legislation passed by parliament. Courts cannot overrule parliaments legislation and no parliament can pass laws that future parliaments cant change. Case law: Collection of past court decisions that help make decisions in a new case. Parliamentary supremacy: Dictates that where case and statue law conflict, statues prevail.
Understand the Problem
The text provides various definitions and explanations concerning legal concepts and frameworks, particularly focusing on different legal traditions and systems in Canada, including aspects of common law and priorities in legal decision-making. It describes how judges make decisions based on precedents, the coexistence of legal systems, and the development of legal principles from various sources.
Answer
Judges use the doctrine of stare decisis to decide binding precedents.
Judges determine which case is a binding precedent by applying the doctrine of stare decisis. They apply past decisions while considering the unique facts of a new case to ensure fairness and consistency in the legal system.
Answer for screen readers
Judges determine which case is a binding precedent by applying the doctrine of stare decisis. They apply past decisions while considering the unique facts of a new case to ensure fairness and consistency in the legal system.
More Information
Stare decisis means 'to stand by things decided' and is crucial for ensuring legal stability by making sure similar cases have similar outcomes.
Tips
Confusing stare decisis with statutory law where statutes are written laws adopted by a legislative body.
Sources
- Understanding Stare Decisis - American Bar Association - americanbar.org
- Stare decisis: Definition, examples and critical analysis - legal.thomsonreuters.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information