1. What was the question before the Supreme Court? 2. How did the Court decide? 3. What Constitutional Amendment was used to justify the majority opinion in this case?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for details regarding a Supreme Court case, specifically what the question was before the Court, how the Court decided, and which Constitutional Amendment justified the majority opinion.
Answer
1. Florida recount's constitutionality; 2. Halted recount, favoring Bush; 3. 14th Amendment.
The final answer is: 1. The Supreme Court had to decide whether the Florida Supreme Court's decision to order a recount in the 2000 Presidential election was constitutional. 2. The Court halted the recount, effectively deciding in favor of Bush. 3. The decision was justified using the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is: 1. The Supreme Court had to decide whether the Florida Supreme Court's decision to order a recount in the 2000 Presidential election was constitutional. 2. The Court halted the recount, effectively deciding in favor of Bush. 3. The decision was justified using the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
More Information
The decision was controversial as it decided the outcome of the 2000 Presidential election. The 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause played a crucial role in the court's decision.
Tips
A common mistake is confusing the role of the Equal Protection Clause. It's essential to understand how it applied to the uniformity of vote counting.
Sources
- Bush v. Gore | Oyez - oyez.org
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
