PSY270H5F Cognition: Reasoning & Problem Solving
10 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which reasoning method states that if p is true, then q must also be true?

  • Falsification
  • Affirmation of Consequent
  • Modus Tollens
  • Modus Ponens (correct)

What is the correct pair of cards to turn over to determine whether the rule is being followed?

  • O and 1
  • O and 8 (correct)
  • K and 8
  • 1 and 8

What cognitive bias affects the tendency to select examples that confirm a rule?

  • Confirmation bias (correct)
  • Anchoring effect
  • Availability heuristic
  • Negativity bias

What approach is described as asking 'what would break the rule'?

<p>Falsification (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is Modus Tollens considered less intuitive compared to Modus Ponens?

<p>It introduces a negative form of reasoning. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What can be concluded when the premise 'A crow is not a bird' is true in the given logic sequence?

<p>A crow does not have a beak. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which statement exemplifies Modus Tollens correctly?

<p>If it rains, then the ground is wet. It is not raining, therefore the ground is not wet. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary flaw in using the Affirmation of the Consequent in logical reasoning?

<p>It incorrectly assumes the antecedent must be true if the consequent is true. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If the antecedent does not happen in a syllogism, what can be inferred regarding the consequent?

<p>The consequent may still be true regardless of the antecedent. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the example with throwing a crinkle-ball, what can be said about Howl carrying off the ball if the antecedent is not observed?

<p>It implies that Howl might still carry off the crinkle-ball. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Modus Ponens

If a statement is true, then another statement must also be true (if p, then q; p is true, therefore q is true).

Modus Tollens

If a statement is false, then another associated statement must also be false (if p, then q; q is false, therefore p is false).

Affirmation of the Consequent

Error in logic: Knowing the statement q is true doesn't mean statement p is true. (if p, then q; q is true, you can't say p is true.)

Antecedent

The part of an 'if/then' statement that follows the 'if' clause. (e.g., in 'if it rains, then the ground gets wet', 'it rains' is the antecedent).

Signup and view all the flashcards

Consequent

The part of an 'if/then' statement that follows the 'then' part. (e.g., in 'if it rains, then the ground gets wet', 'the ground gets wet' is the consequent).

Signup and view all the flashcards

Confirmation Bias

The tendency to seek or interpret information that confirms one's existing beliefs.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Falsification

A method for determining if a statement is false by examining potential disproving cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Wason Card Selection Task

A logic puzzle used to illustrate how people struggle to use deductive reasoning.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Cognition: The Machinery of the Mind

  • Course: PSY270H5F
  • Instructor: Dr. Benjamin Wolfe
  • Class schedule: Wednesdays, 9am - 12pm, DV 2072
  • Email: [email protected]

Lecture Outline

  • One Minute Survey Questions
  • Lecture 11: Reasoning and Problem Solving
  • Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
  • What is a problem?
  • Problem-solving strategies
  • Expertise and its limits
  • Constraints and self-constraints

Reasoning

  • Asking "what's most probable?"
  • How do we figure this out?
    • Evidence
    • Experience
    • Logical Thinking

Types of Reasoning

  • Inductive
    • What's likely?
    • Probabilistic
  • Deductive
    • What must be true?
    • Logical rules

Drawing Conclusions (Syllogisms)

  • Two premises and a conclusion
  • If the two premises are true, the conclusion must also be true (within the syllogism's bounds)
  • If either premise is false, the entire syllogism breaks down.

What if we know 'p' is true?

  • Modus ponens: If 'p' is true, then 'q' must also be true.

What if we don't observe 'p'?

  • Modus tollens: If 'p' is false, then 'q' is not necessarily true (must not be true).

Can the consequent alone tell us anything?

  • Affirmation of the Consequent is not a valid form of deductive reasoning.

What if the antecedent does not happen? (not-p)

  • Knowing that the antecedent ('p') did not happen does not tell us anything definitive about the consequent ('q').

The Wason Card Selection Task

  • Rule based on cards and their side properties (vowel/even number)
  • Determining which card to flip to validate or disprove the rule.
  • Reveals limitations of human reasoning; bias toward confirming rules instead of disproving them.

Hacking the Problem (Permission Schema)

  • If A is satisfied, then B may be carried out.
  • Examples of using permission schemas in real-world scenarios (airport immigration)
  • Just changing instructions can easily alter decision making.

Inductive Reasoning

  • Drawing conclusions about what's most probable given prior evidence and experience
    • Building on known properties or features.
    • Assuming universality; how representative is a smaller example of a wider set?

Confirmation Bias

  • Favoring information and situations that confirm existing beliefs or knowledge and not exploring other possibilities.

Dealing with Uncertainty(Bayes' Rule)

  • Bayes' Rule: posterior probability is the product of prior probability and likelihood.

Prior Probabilities

  • Taking existing knowledge into consideration during problem solving (e.g., how common is that thing already).

Range of Chonkitude

  • The frequency distribution of a feature.

Thinking Differently (Reframing)

  • Reframing or changing the way you first view problems to generate new, creative solutions.

Kaplan and Simon's Results

  • Framing a problem in more useful formats can positively impact outcome/solution.

Structural Features vs Surface Features

  • Focusing on the underlying mechanisms of a problem, as opposed to the superficial appearance.

Thinking Laterally

  • Reframing problems in innovative ways to generate creative solutions

What's the real problem?

  • Problem of identification vs description
  • Experiential knowledge vs. formal knowledge

Expertise

  • High performance, but often underestimate themselves.

Problem Solving Strategies

  • Means-end analysis: identifying subgoals and pursuing them to achieve ultimate goals.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Description

This quiz covers Lecture 11 of PSY270H5F, focusing on reasoning and problem-solving strategies. Topics include deductive and inductive reasoning, the nature of problems, techniques for drawing conclusions, and the limitations of expertise. Test your understanding of how we arrive at logical conclusions and the mechanics behind reasoning.

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser