Podcast
Questions and Answers
Under what conditions may a non-contractual anti-suit injunction be granted by the Singapore courts?
Under what conditions may a non-contractual anti-suit injunction be granted by the Singapore courts?
What is the meaning of 'vexatious or oppressive' in the context of foreign proceedings?
What is the meaning of 'vexatious or oppressive' in the context of foreign proceedings?
What factor is typically subsumed under the 'injustice' enquiry concerning anti-suit injunctions?
What factor is typically subsumed under the 'injustice' enquiry concerning anti-suit injunctions?
What does 'comity' require from the Singapore court regarding foreign proceedings?
What does 'comity' require from the Singapore court regarding foreign proceedings?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following circumstances typically characterize foreign proceedings that may warrant attention from the Singapore courts?
Which of the following circumstances typically characterize foreign proceedings that may warrant attention from the Singapore courts?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the primary purpose of an anti-suit injunction?
What is the primary purpose of an anti-suit injunction?
Signup and view all the answers
Which factor is a pre-requisite for the issuance of an interim injunction by the Singapore courts?
Which factor is a pre-requisite for the issuance of an interim injunction by the Singapore courts?
Signup and view all the answers
In what situation would Singapore courts most likely deny an anti-suit injunction despite a jurisdiction clause in favor of Singapore?
In what situation would Singapore courts most likely deny an anti-suit injunction despite a jurisdiction clause in favor of Singapore?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following factors concerning anti-suit injunctions deals directly with contractual obligations?
Which of the following factors concerning anti-suit injunctions deals directly with contractual obligations?
Signup and view all the answers
Why might a Singapore court be reluctant to grant anti-suit injunctions in cases where parties have chosen foreign courts?
Why might a Singapore court be reluctant to grant anti-suit injunctions in cases where parties have chosen foreign courts?
Signup and view all the answers
What might trigger a Singapore court to consider the alleged injustice to the defendant in relation to anti-suit injunctions?
What might trigger a Singapore court to consider the alleged injustice to the defendant in relation to anti-suit injunctions?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the presence of a jurisdiction clause selecting Singapore courts imply for anti-suit injunctions?
What does the presence of a jurisdiction clause selecting Singapore courts imply for anti-suit injunctions?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following is NOT considered a factor in determining the grant of an anti-suit injunction?
Which of the following is NOT considered a factor in determining the grant of an anti-suit injunction?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Anti-Suit Injunctions (ASI)
- ASIs prohibit the targeted party from commencing or continuing proceedings in a foreign court.
- The rationale behind ASIs is to prevent fragmentation of proceedings and to protect the jurisdiction of the Singapore court.
Factors Considered for Granting an ASI
- Jurisdiction (Factor a): The defendants must be amenable to the jurisdiction of the Singapore court. This is a prerequisite for granting an ASI.
- Natural Forum (Factor b): The Singapore court should be the natural forum for resolving the dispute.
- Vexation or Oppression (Factor c): There must be evidence that continuing foreign proceedings would be vexatious or oppressive to the claimant.
- Injustice to the Defendant (Factor d): An ASI should not deprive the defendant of the advantages sought in the foreign proceedings. This consideration is often subsumed under factor (c).
- Breach of Jurisdiction Agreement (Factor e): The institution of foreign proceedings should not be in breach of any jurisdiction agreement between the parties.
Contractual ASIs
- When there is a jurisdiction clause choosing Singapore courts, courts readily grant ASIs to restrain foreign proceedings.
- This upholds the principle of holding parties to their bargains.
- Courts will not generally grant ASIs where parties choose the courts of a foreign state, even to restrain proceedings in another foreign state.
Contractual ASIs - Exceptions
- Despite a Singapore jurisdiction clause, courts may deny an ASI if there is "strong cause" not to enforce the clause or the application was unreasonably delayed.
- This is because even a non-chosen court has a legitimate interest in not having its time and expenses wasted.
- An application is only considered reasonably delayed if the delay was due to the applicant's objections to the foreign court's jurisdiction.
Non-Contractual ASIs
- Singapore courts are generally reluctant to grant ASIs when no Singapore jurisdiction clause exists.
- The principle of comity requires the Singapore court not to interfere with foreign proceedings unless there are compelling reasons.
- For a non-contractual ASI to be granted, the Singapore court must have jurisdiction, be the natural forum, and the foreign proceedings must be vexatious or oppressive.
- Delay is also relevant in non-contractual ASI cases.
Non-Contractual ASIs - Vexation or Oppression
- Foreign proceedings are considered "vexatious or oppressive" when they are effectively unconscionable.
- Unconscionable proceedings may involve oppressive procedures, extreme inconvenience, or be commenced in bad faith.
- Good faith requires that the foreign proceedings are not initiated solely to disrupt the Singapore proceedings.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
This quiz explores the concept of Anti-Suit Injunctions (ASI), focusing on their purpose and the factors considered when granting them in Singapore courts. Learn about jurisdiction, the natural forum, and implications for defendants and claimants while understanding the court's role in preventing vexation or oppression in foreign proceedings.