🎧 New: AI-Generated Podcasts Turn your study notes into engaging audio conversations. Learn more

Moot Proposition (1).pdf

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Full Transcript

MOOT PROPOSITION Union of Indika is a Democratic Country. Some group of individuals in this country is protesting against the certain farm laws passed by the parliament. One Association by name Sandesh Farmar Morcha (SFM) came forward to help the protestor. The s...

MOOT PROPOSITION Union of Indika is a Democratic Country. Some group of individuals in this country is protesting against the certain farm laws passed by the parliament. One Association by name Sandesh Farmar Morcha (SFM) came forward to help the protestor. The said association which came forward to support protestor has large network throughout the country. The said association formed different social media groups on Wazzapp and Friendsbook to help the protestors. On one day members of said association had post their views on social media about constitutional validity of the Farm Law and pursuant to this certain members of the said association expressed their critical views about the government and because of this agitation & riots started all over the country against the government. The social media posts of the said association was brought before Ruiling party by some people and it reached up to some of the Ministers. Therefore, an urgent cabinet meeting was called in order to ban these kinds of online activities in the country. In the meeting a resolution was passed for banning these kind of activities in exercise of the power conferred by the Information Technology Act, which talks about Monitoring and Decryption of Information. Some members of said associations were arrested and investigated by police stating that they are disseminating false information about the law passed by the government with the purpose of instigating people against the government and their phones, computers and laptops were seized by authorities stating it forms part of investigation. The Government also authorized its securities and intelligence Agencies for the purpose of interception; monitoring and decryption of any information generated, transmitted, received or stored in any computer resources. The Members of the said association found to have propagated such information and they were charged with sections 120B, 124A and 153A of Indika Penal code and their Anticipatory Bail Application were rejected by the High court. The Said Association argued that it is the ultimate assault on fundamental rights and the right to privacy. That pursuant to this the said Associations filed Writ petition by challenging the validity of the order passed by the Home Ministry of Indika, Constitutional validity of section 124-A of Indika Penal code, and against the order of rejection of bail application before Hon’ble Supreme Court of Indika. The Constitution and the laws in force in India will be taken as the Constitution and the Law in Force in Indika. Note: The participant can frame their own issues

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser