Document Details

StrikingTonalism9846

Uploaded by StrikingTonalism9846

University of Southern Mindanao

Tags

portfolio assessment assessment methods student learning education

Summary

This document outlines the methods and stages involved in implementing portfolio assessment. It covers the importance of portfolios, different portfolio types, how to develop a portfolio, and how to evaluate a portfolio. This information is likely part of a presentation or lecture for a university course related to education or assessment.

Full Transcript

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MINDANAO PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT METHODS A portfolio assessment is a method of evaluating a collection of a student's work over a period of time to measure their progress, skills, and accomplishments. It involves systematically gathering and reviewing various artifacts s...

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MINDANAO PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT METHODS A portfolio assessment is a method of evaluating a collection of a student's work over a period of time to measure their progress, skills, and accomplishments. It involves systematically gathering and reviewing various artifacts such as written assignments, projects, reflections, and other evidence of learning to assess the student's growth, mastery of subjects, and ability to meet specific learning It is a dynamic and holistic approach that goes beyond just measuring what students know. It’s highlighting their best achievements or documenting their improvement, portfolios offers a richer and more personalized way to assess learning in a world that values innovation, depth, and continuous improvement. This method also encourages critical thinking and metacognition, as students are actively engaged in organizing their work, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses, and understanding how they improved. Features and Principles of Portfolio Assessment RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW Features 1. Collection of student work: Gathering various samples of student activities. 2. Long-term focus: Assessing progress over an extended period, rather than a single moment. 3. Authentic tasks: Using real-world examples and applications. 4. Student reflection: Encouraging self- assessment and reflection. 5. Multiple criteria: Evaluating various aspects, such as content, process, and product. Principles 1. Validity: Aligning assessment with learning objectives. 2. Reliability: Consistent evaluation standards. 3. Authenticity: Reflecting real-world contexts. 4. Student-centered: Focusing on individual progress. 5. Collaborative: Involving 6. Ongoing: Regular feedback and revision. 7. Transparent: Clear criteria and standards. 8. Equitable: Fair and unbiased evaluation. PURPOSES OF PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT Portfolio assessment matches assessment to teaching. Portfolio assessment has clear goals. In fact, they are decided on at the beginning of instruction and are clear to teacher and students alike Portfolio assessment gives a profile of learners abilities in terms of depth, breadth and growth Portfolio assessment is a tool for assessing a variety of skills not normally testable in a single setting for traditional testing. Insert Running Title Portfolio assessment develops awareness of students own learning. Portfolio assessment caters to individuals in a heterogeneous class. Portfolio assessment develops social skills. Portfolio assessment develops independent and ctive learners. Portfolio assessment can improve motivation for learning and achievement. Portfolio assessment provides opportunity for student-teacher dialogue. Insert Running Title UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MINDANAO Essential Elements of Portfolio 1. COVER LETTER The cover letter summarizes the evidence of a student's learning and progress. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS with number pages. 3. ENTRIES both core (items students have to include) and optional (items of students choice). 4. DATES dates on all entries, to facilitate proof of growth over time. 5. DRAFTS drafts of aural/oral and written products and revised versions i.e., first drafts and corrected/revised versions. 6. REFLECTIONS can appear at different stages in the learning process (for formative and/or summative purposes) and can be written in the mother tongue at the lower levels or by students who find it difficult to express themselves in UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MINDANAO STAGES OF IMPLEMENTING PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT 1.Identifying Teaching Goals to Assess Through Portfolio This stage requires careful consideration of the desired learning outcomes for your students. 2. Introducing the Idea of Portfolio Assessment in Your It involves Classits explaining purpose and benefits. 3. Specification of Portfolio Content This stage involves outlining the specific content that will be included in the portfolio. 4. Giving Clear and Detailed Guidelines for Portfolio Presentation Communicate how the portfolio will be graded and when it needs to be submitted. 5. Informing Key School Officials, Parents, and ThisOther Stakeholders proactive step serves as a precaution in case students later raise concerns about the new assessment procedure. It's also a good practice to inform parents about the portfolio assessment and allow them to provide 6. Development of the Portfolio This stage requires support and encouragement for both students and teachers. Students need a patient and understanding teacher to guide them. 6. Development of the Portfolio This stage requires support and encouragement for both students and teachers. Students need a patient and understanding teacher to guide them. TYPES OF PORTFOLI OS RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW A. Documentation Portfolio -This portfolio is called “growth portfolio” in the literature. It can include everything from brainstorming activities to drafts to finished product. RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW B. Process Portfolio -It demonstrates all facets or phrases of the learning process. -As such, these portfolios contain an extensive number of reflective journal, think logs and other related forms of metacognitive processing. RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW C. Showcase Portfolio -It only shows the best of the students’ outputs and product. -As such, this type of portfolio is best used for summative evaluation of students’ mastery of key RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MINDANAO Assessing and Evaluating the portfolios rating scale for cover letter content Assessing and evaluating cover letter content in portfolios using a rating scale helps ensure a fair and consistent process when reviewing RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW A rating scale provides clear criteria for evaluating important aspects such as the introduction, job alignment, tone, structure, and closing. RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW Purpose of Using a Rating Scale The primary goal of using a rating scale to evaluate cover letters is to create a structured method that: Ensures consistency in evaluating multiple portfolios. RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW Provides an objective basis for comparison. Helps evaluators identify key strengths and areas for improvement in the candidates’ cover letters. RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW Criteria for Evaluating Cover Letters Introduction and Personalization Is the candidate able to introduce themselves effectively? Is the cover letter tailored to the specific role or organization? Skills and Job Alignment Does the candidate clearly align their skills and experiences with the job description? Are specific examples provided to demonstrate their fit for the role? RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW Professional Tone and Language Is the cover letter written in a professional, clear, and concise manner? Are there any grammatical or spelling errors? Structure and Formatting Is the cover letter well-organized with clear sections (introduction, body, and conclusion)? Is the formatting clean and easy to read? RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW Closing and Call to Action Does the candidate include a strong, confident closing statement? Is there a clear request for an interview or further discussion? RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW Rating Scale Breakdown A 5-point rating scale is commonly used to assess cover letter content, with the following definitions: 5 (Excellent): The cover letter is exceptionally well-written, tailored, and professional with no errors. 4 (Good): The letter meets most RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW 3 (Average): The letter is satisfactory but could use more specific examples and polish. 2 (Below Average): The letter is generic, with noticeable gaps in professionalism and relevance. 1 (Poor): The letter lacks clarity, structure, and relevance, with multiple errors. RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW Benefits of a Rating Scale Objective Evaluation: Ensures every cover letter is evaluated using the same criteria, reducing subjectivity. Easy Comparison: Allows for straightforward comparison across portfolios, highlighting the strongest candidates. Focused Feedback: Helps provide specific, constructive feedback to RDE MIDYEAR IN-HOUSE REVIEW

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser