Getting Started with Open Source Development PDF

Document Details

2010

Rachna Kapur, Mario Briggs, Tapas Saha, Ulisses Costa, Pedro Carvalho, Raul F. Chong, Peter Kohlmann

Tags

open source development software development licensing computer science

Summary

This book provides a beginner friendly introduction to open source development, encompassing its history, business models, and licensing details. It covers various aspects, such as the evolution of open source, different business models impacting open-source projects, and types of licenses.

Full Transcript

GETTING STARTED WITH Open source development A book for the community by the community Rachna Kapur, Mario Briggs, Tapas Saha, Ulisses Costa, Pedro Carvalho, Raul F. Chong, Peter Kohlmann FIRST EDITION 4 Getting started with open source development First Edition (July 2010) © Copyr...

GETTING STARTED WITH Open source development A book for the community by the community Rachna Kapur, Mario Briggs, Tapas Saha, Ulisses Costa, Pedro Carvalho, Raul F. Chong, Peter Kohlmann FIRST EDITION 4 Getting started with open source development First Edition (July 2010) © Copyright IBM Corporation 2010. All rights reserved. IBM Canada 8200 Warden Avenue Markham, ON L6G 1C7 Canada 5 Notices This information was developed for products and services offered in the U.S.A. IBM may not offer the products, services, or features discussed in this document in other countries. Consult your local IBM representative for information on the products and services currently available in your area. Any reference to an IBM product, program, or service is not intended to state or imply that only that IBM product, program, or service may be used. Any functionally equivalent product, program, or service that does not infringe any IBM intellectual property right may be used instead. However, it is the user's responsibility to evaluate and verify the operation of any non-IBM product, program, or service. IBM may have patents or pending patent applications covering subject matter described in this document. The furnishing of this document does not grant you any license to these patents. You can send license inquiries, in writing, to: IBM Director of Licensing IBM Corporation North Castle Drive Armonk, NY 10504-1785 U.S.A. For license inquiries regarding double-byte character set (DBCS) information, contact the IBM Intellectual Property Department in your country or send inquiries, in writing, to: Intellectual Property Licensing Legal and Intellectual Property Law IBM Japan, Ltd. 3-2-12, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-8711 The following paragraph does not apply to the United Kingdom or any other country where such provisions are inconsistent with local law: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION PROVIDES THIS PUBLICATION "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Some states do not allow disclaimer of express or implied warranties in certain transactions, therefore, this statement may not apply to you. This information could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically made to the information herein; these changes will be incorporated in new editions of the publication. IBM may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described in this publication at any time without notice. Any references in this information to non-IBM Web sites are provided for convenience only and do not in any manner serve as an endorsement of those Web sites. The materials at those Web sites are not part of the materials for this IBM product and use of those Web sites is at your own risk. IBM may use or distribute any of the information you supply in any way it believes appropriate without incurring any obligation to you. 6 Getting started with open source development The licensed program described in this document and all licensed material available for it are provided by IBM under terms of the IBM Customer Agreement, IBM International Program License Agreement or any equivalent agreement between us. Any performance data contained herein was determined in a controlled environment. Therefore, the results obtained in other operating environments may vary significantly. Some measurements may have been made on development-level systems and there is no guarantee that these measurements will be the same on generally available systems. Furthermore, some measurements may have been estimated through extrapolation. Actual results may vary. Users of this document should verify the applicable data for their specific environment. Information concerning non-IBM products was obtained from the suppliers of those products, their published announcements or other publicly available sources. IBM has not tested those products and cannot confirm the accuracy of performance, compatibility or any other claims related to non-IBM products. Questions on the capabilities of non-IBM products should be addressed to the suppliers of those products. All statements regarding IBM's future direction or intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice, and represent goals and objectives only. This information contains examples of data and reports used in daily business operations. To illustrate them as completely as possible, the examples include the names of individuals, companies, brands, and products. All of these names are fictitious and any similarity to the names and addresses used by an actual business enterprise is entirely coincidental. COPYRIGHT LICENSE: This information contains sample application programs in source language, which illustrate programming techniques on various operating platforms. You may copy, modify, and distribute these sample programs in any form without payment to IBM, for the purposes of developing, using, marketing or distributing application programs conforming to the application programming interface for the operating platform for which the sample programs are written. These examples have not been thoroughly tested under all conditions. IBM, therefore, cannot guarantee or imply reliability, serviceability, or function of these programs. The sample programs are provided "AS IS", without warranty of any kind. IBM shall not be liable for any damages arising out of your use of the sample programs. References in this publication to IBM products or services do not imply that IBM intends to make them available in all countries in which IBM operates. If you are viewing this information softcopy, the photographs and color illustrations may not appear. 7 Trademarks IBM, the IBM logo, and ibm.com are trademarks or registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corp., registered in many jurisdictions worldwide. Other product and service names might be trademarks of IBM or other companies. A current list of IBM trademarks is available on the Web at “Copyright and trademark information” at www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade.shtml. Java and all Java-based trademarks are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States, other countries, or both. Microsoft and Windows are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both. UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the United States and other countries. Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others. Table of Contents Preface............................................................................................................................. 13 Who should read this book?........................................................................................ 13 How is this book structured?........................................................................................ 13 A book for the community............................................................................................ 13 Conventions................................................................................................................. 14 What’s next?................................................................................................................ 14 About the authors........................................................................................................... 17 Contributors.................................................................................................................... 19 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................ 19 Chapter 1 – Introduction to open source development.............................................. 21 1.1 A brief history about open source development.................................................... 21 1.2 The evolution of the open source movement........................................................ 22 1.3 FLOSS - Free, libre, open source software........................................................... 24 1.4 Advantages and disadvantages of open source.................................................... 25 1.4.1 Pros................................................................................................................. 25 1.4.2 Cons................................................................................................................ 26 1.5 Open source trends and perspectives................................................................... 26 1.6 Career path............................................................................................................ 27 1.7 Exercises............................................................................................................... 27 1.8 Summary................................................................................................................ 27 1.9 Review questions................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 2 – Open source business models................................................................. 31 2.1 Open source business models: The big picture.................................................... 31 2.2 Dual licensing......................................................................................................... 33 2.3 Split open source software / commercial products................................................ 34 2.4 Product specialists................................................................................................. 35 2.5 Platform providers.................................................................................................. 36 2.6 Business model relationship to license.................................................................. 37 2.7 Open source business model and proprietary software........................................ 38 2.8 Summary................................................................................................................ 39 2.9 Exercises............................................................................................................... 39 2.10 Review questions................................................................................................. 40 Chapter 3 – Licensing..................................................................................................... 43 3.1 Intellectual property, copyright and licensing: The big picture............................... 43 3.2 Open source licensing........................................................................................... 44 3.2.1 History of open source licensing..................................................................... 44 3.2.2 Commonly used open source licenses........................................................... 46 3.3 Choosing the right license..................................................................................... 47 3.4 Exercises............................................................................................................... 48 3.5 Summary................................................................................................................ 48 3.6 Review questions................................................................................................... 48 Chapter 4 – Community driven development.............................................................. 51 4.1 Community driven development: The big picture.................................................. 51 10 Getting started with open source development 4.1.1 Developers' group: Software design and development.................................. 53 4.1.2 Builders' group: Software building.................................................................. 55 4.1.3 Testers' group: Software Testing.................................................................... 56 4.1.4 Release management group: Packaging....................................................... 57 4.1.5 Release management group: Releasing........................................................ 58 4.2 Installation and issue tracking................................................................................ 59 4.2.1 Installation....................................................................................................... 59 4.2.2 Issue tracking.................................................................................................. 60 4.3 Exercises............................................................................................................... 61 4.4 Summary................................................................................................................ 61 4.5 Review questions................................................................................................... 62 Chapter 5 – Participating in open source development............................................. 65 5.1 Participating in open source development: The big picture................................... 65 5.2 Open source communities..................................................................................... 67 5.3 Effective communication........................................................................................ 70 5.3.1 Communication etiquette and guidelines........................................................ 72 5.4 Exercises............................................................................................................... 73 5.5 Summary................................................................................................................ 73 5.6 Review questions................................................................................................... 73 Chapter 6 – Starting your own open source project................................................... 77 6.1 Starting your own open source project: The big picture........................................ 77 6.2 Providing the ecosystem for your open source project.......................................... 78 6.3 Accepting contributions.......................................................................................... 79 6.4 Exercises............................................................................................................... 80 6.5 Summary................................................................................................................ 80 6.6 Review questions................................................................................................... 80 Chapter 7 – Case Study: Contributing to an open source project............................. 83 7.1 Ruby on Rails and the DB2 module....................................................................... 83 7.2 The ruby forge........................................................................................................ 84 7.3 Submitting a bug.................................................................................................... 86 Chapter 8 - Case Study: A sourceForge project, Technology Explorer for IBM DB289 8.1 What is the Technology Explorer for IBM DB2?.................................................... 89 8.2 A quick overview of the Technology Explorer for IBM DB2................................... 90 8.2.1 Requirements for setting up the TE................................................................ 90 8.2.2 Some basic features and operations of the TE.............................................. 91 8.3 You need a key insight to build a project............................................................... 98 8.4 You need to support and grow a community....................................................... 100 8.5 Make your project easy to adopt.......................................................................... 100 8.6 Understand your business model........................................................................ 102 8.7 Keep your project current.................................................................................... 105 Appendix A – Solutions to review questions............................................................. 107 Appendix B – Up and running with DB2..................................................................... 113 B.1 DB2: The big picture............................................................................................ 113 B.2 DB2 packaging.................................................................................................... 114 B.2.1 DB2 servers.................................................................................................. 114 11 B.2.2 DB2 clients and drivers................................................................................ 115 B.3 Installing DB2...................................................................................................... 116 B.3.1 Installation on Windows................................................................................ 116 B.3.2 Installation on Linux...................................................................................... 117 B.4 DB2 tools............................................................................................................. 117 B.4.1 Control Center.............................................................................................. 117 B.4.2 Command Line Tools................................................................................... 119 B.5 The DB2 environment.......................................................................................... 122 B.6 DB2 configuration................................................................................................ 123 B.7 Connecting to a database................................................................................... 124 B.8 Basic sample programs....................................................................................... 125 B.9 DB2 documentation............................................................................................. 127 References..................................................................................................................... 129 Resources...................................................................................................................... 131 Web sites................................................................................................................... 131 Books......................................................................................................................... 134 Contact emails........................................................................................................... 135 13 Preface Keeping your skills current in today's world is becoming increasingly challenging. There are too many new technologies being developed, and little time to learn them all. The DB2® on Campus Book Series has been developed to minimize the time and effort required to learn many of these new technologies. Who should read this book? This book is a good starting point for beginners to the open source world. It is specially written to equip students, and open source enthusiasts with the norms and best practices of open source. You should read this book if you want to:  Educate yourself on the objectives of open source  Understand open source software licensing requirements  Get an introduction to the norms followed in the open source world  Join the open source movement and begin contributing. How is this book structured? The first chapters of this book discuss the history of open source software development and its licensing requirements. It then talks about how organizations use open source as their business model. Chapter 4 introduces the reader to the tools used in the development of an open source project. Chapters 5 and 6 take the reader into more details about how to contribute to an existing open source project. Chapter 7 provides a case study where you practice contributing to an open source project. Chapter 8 goes a bit deeper describing the Technology Explorer for IBM DB2, an open source project hosted at sourceForge.net; it also summarizes and revisits some of the concepts discussed in the previous chapters. Exercises are provided with most chapters. There are also review questions in each chapter to help you learn the material; answers to review questions are included in Appendix A. A book for the community This book was created by the community; a community consisting of university professors, students, and professionals (including IBM employees). The online version of this book is released to the community at no-charge. Numerous members of the community from around the world have participated in developing this book, which will also be translated to several languages by the community. If you would like to provide feedback, contribute new material, improve existing material, or help with translating this book to another language, please send an email of your planned contribution to [email protected] with the subject “Getting started with open source development book feedback” 14 Getting started with open source development Conventions Many examples of commands, SQL statements, and code are included throughout the book. Specific keywords are written in uppercase bold. For example: A NULL value represents an unknown state. Commands are shown in lowercase bold. For example: The dir command lists all files and subdirectories on Windows®. SQL statements are shown in upper case bold. For example: Use the SELECT statement to retrieve information from a table. Object names used in our examples are shown in bold italics. For example: The flights table has five columns. Italics are also used for variable names in the syntax of a command or statement. If the variable name has more than one word, it is joined with an underscore. For example: CREATE TABLE table_name What’s next? We recommend you to review the following books in this book series for more details about related topics:  Getting started with DB2 Express-C  Getting started with Ruby on Rails  Getting started with PHP  Getting started with Python  Getting started with Perl The following figure shows all the different eBooks in the DB2 on Campus book series available for free at ibm.com/db2/books 15 The DB2 on Campus book series 17 About the authors Rachna Kapur is the development manager for open source technologies at the IBM India software labs. She works with a team driving value propositions for IBM® Data Servers in the open source world. She brings 8 years of experience developing drivers in the health care and database domain. Mario Briggs is the architect for the open source offerings for the IBM Data Servers, which includes Ruby/Rails, Python/Django/SqlAlchemy, Hibernate, Spring, iBatis & PHP. Mario has almost 11 years of experience in software development with many years in the area of data access, relational engines and application-database performance. Tapas Saha is a graduate in electronics and communication engineering from Techno India, Kolkata, India. He joined IBM in 2007, as an open source software developer. Presently, he is working as a functional verification tester for DB2® for Linux®, UNIX®, and Windows®. Ulisses Araújo Costa is a software engineer finishing his MSc in Formal Methods and Intelligent Systems. He loves functional programming and open source methodologies. He is a pro-active individual who loves to be connected to academic initiatives, like the open source support center at the University of Minho and the DB2 student ambassador group at the same university. Pedro Carvalho is a Software Engineering student at the University of Minho in Portugal. Aside from school, he has developed an interest in systems administration and team leading. He has been strongly engaged in local student organizations, mainly in the creation of an open source software group. He is currently working in a research scholarship in the area of language engineering and several Web development projects. Raul F. Chong is the DB2 on Campus program manager based at the IBM Toronto Laboratory, and a DB2 technical evangelist. His main responsibility is to grow the DB2 community around the world. Raul joined IBM in 1997 and has held numerous positions in the company. As a DB2 consultant, Raul helped IBM business partners with migrations from other relational database management systems to DB2, as well as with database performance and application design issues. As a DB2 technical support specialist, Raul has helped resolve DB2 problems on the OS/390®, z/OS®, Linux®, UNIX® and Windows platforms. Raul has taught many DB2 workshops, has published numerous articles, and has contributed to the DB2 Certification exam tutorials. Raul has summarized many of his DB2 experiences through the years in his book Understanding DB2 - Learning Visually with Examples 2nd Edition (ISBN-10: 0131580183) for which he is the lead author. He has also co-authored the book DB2 SQL PL Essential Guide for DB2 UDB on Linux, UNIX, Windows, i5/OS, and z/OS (ISBN 0131477005), and is the project lead and co-author of many of the books in the DB2 on Campus book series. Peter Kohlmann manages the DB2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows Product Planning Office. His team is responsible for requirements management, business analytics, tactical planning, technology demonstration and customer relationship management. He is also the original developer and the design lead for the Technology Explorer for IBM® DB2® open 18 Getting started with open source development source project. Peter has been in database technology development since 1989. This includes writing about application development, database administration and performance tuning. He has worked as team lead, architect and development manager in user interface development for DB2. He managed the business development process for the Information Management division, and was the project manager for the first large scale TPCC performance benchmarks for DB2. Prior to his current role he was the DB2 Express development lead. 19 Contributors The following people edited, reviewed, provided content, and contributed significantly to this book. Contributor Company/University Position/Occupation Contribution Misato IBM Toronto Lab Technology Explorer Overall review and Sakamoto for DB2 - Developer input for Chapter 8 Leon IBM Toronto Lab Program Director, IBM Technical review Katsnelson Data Servers Acknowledgements We greatly thank the following individuals for their assistance in developing materials referenced in this book: Martin Streicher for his article "Open source licensing" published by IBM developerWorks® Natasha Tolub for designing the cover of this book. Susan Visser for assistance with publishing this book. Chapter 1 – Introduction to open source 1 development Open source software development is a methodology for creating software products, from the design and development to distribution. Under this methodology the author offers access to the source code. This chapter gets you started into this fascinating software development world. It teaches you how it all started, and what the direction will be for the coming years. In this chapter you will learn about:  A brief history about open source software development  The evolution of the open source movement  Open source versus free software  Advantages and disadvantages of open source  Trends and perspectives  Career prospective in the open source world 1.1 A brief history about open source development The story of open source development started long before Richard Stallman created the Free Software movement. In the 50's and 60's almost all the software that existed was mostly produced by research institutes. Software was not seen as a product. In those times, computer companies were in the hardware business; and software was made freely available to encourage hardware sales. The source code was distributed with the software because users often had to change the code to fix bugs or add new features to support hardware issues. During this time software was developed and distributed by communities of user groups and no effort was needed to make it freely available. Things started to change in the early 1970's when operating systems and compilers began to grow very fast, with the emergence of micro-processors. For almost a decade until the early 1980's computer vendors and software companies began to routinely charge for software licenses, and sell software as a product imposing legal restrictions on new software developments through copyrights, trademarks, and leasing contracts. At that time 22 Getting started with open source development two different groups, both in United States, were establishing the roots of the current open source software (OSS) philosophy. In the East coast, a programmer at the MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab launched the GNU Project and the Free Software Foundation, his name was Richard Stallman. On the West coast, the Computer Science Research Group (CSRG) of the University of California at Berkeley were improving the UNIX system, and started to build lots of applications which quickly became known as “BSD UNIX”. With the advent of Usenet, an Internet user group, programming communities started to share their software and contribute to each others' work. This is when the real development of the open source movement began. 1.2 The evolution of the open source movement We start recording the evolution of open source development from the creation in 1986 of the Free Software Foundation by Richard Stallman (who likes to use his initials RMS). After this foundation was established, several major open source projects were initiated as shown in Figure 1.1. Figure 1.2 - Evolution of Open Source development Chapter 1 – Introduction to open source development 23 In 1984, Stallman started the GNU project with the ultimate goal of building a free operating system. Within this project, he wrote the EMACS editor, which is considered by many as the most powerful text editor. In 1985 Stallman created the Free Software Foundation (FSF), a nonprofit organization dedicated to the elimination of restrictions on copying, redistribution, understanding and modification of computer programs. The organization's goal was to promote the development and use of open source software in all areas of computing, particularly in helping to develop the GNU operating system and its tools. Until 1990 the foundation was dedicated to writing more software. Today, it coordinates many independent open source projects, where the FSF's focus has shifted to the structural and legal aspects of the open source community. As a legal tool, the GNU General Public License (GPL) was designed not only to ensure that the software produced by GNU would remain free, but to promote the production of more and more open source software. In 1987 Stallman created an open source compiler, the GNU C Compiler (GCC) with the idea to encourage more open source code contributions. Nowadays the GCC compiler is often chosen as the favorite to develop software that needs to be implemented in various types of hardware and supports C, C++, FORTRAN, Ada, Java™, Objective-C and Pascal. For many years, employees of Cygnus Support, a small company founded by Michael Tiemann, David Vinayak Wallace, and John Gilmore were the maintainers of several key GNU software products, including the GNU Debugger (gdb) and GNU Binutils. This company was also one of the major contributors to the GCC project. In 1991 a student of the Department of Computer Science at the University of Helsinki in Finland, Linus Torvalds, created with the help of several volunteer programmers through Usenet the Linux® kernel. Some time after, the kernel grew with the assistance of developers around the world as open source software. A few years later a full open source operating system was available and released as GNU/Linux. In 1993 the Debian GNU/Linux operating system was created by Ian Murdock in order to assemble all the GNU tools that existed at the time and the Linux kernel. The Debian Project grew slowly and gained notoriety when the program dpkg was released. This program is the basis of the Debian package management system and is used to install, remove, and provide information on the Debian software packages (.deb). One of the most important events in open source development happened in 1994 when Robert McCool developed the Apache HTTP server. This Web server played a key role in the development of the World Wide Web, and it was the first open source alternative to the Netscape Web server. Today, more than 100 million Web sites use Apache as their Web server of choice, as shown in Figure 1.2. 24 Getting started with open source development Figure 1.2 – Market share for top Web servers across all domains according to Netcraft (http://www.netcraft.com) In 1995 Marc Ewing created his own Linux distribution called RedHat. RedHat is nowadays a major company that provides operating-system platforms along with middleware, applications, and management products, as well as support, training, and consulting services. In 1996 the KDE and GNOME desktop environments were developed, providing basic desktop functionality for daily needs as well as development tools. Two years later, in 1998, many software companies started to accept the open source movement when Netscape Communicator source code was made open source, and the Mozilla Foundation was established. It is in that year as well, that the term open source was first used at a conference in California. This term was created by Eric Raymond and Bruce Perens to promote the free software philosophy in the corporate world. 1.3 FLOSS - Free, libre, open source software Until now the use of the term "open source" has many opponents. From one side Stallman and others with similar thoughts object to "open source" as they say it does not make users realize the freedom that the software in question gives to them. And when Stallman uses the term "free software", he is not referring to price as indicated by his quote, “Free software is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of 'free' as in free speech, not as in 'free beer'”. On the other hand, using the term "free software" was commonly confused with the no-charge connotation, which obviously made business organizations uneasy. In order to end this discussion other terms have been proposed, one of them is FLOSS – Free, libre, open source software, or Free (as in libre) open source software. There are Chapter 1 – Introduction to open source development 25 three terms to explain this concept. As already mentioned, free software is a philosophical concept that aims to convey the idea of software that can be used, studied and modified without any restriction. It does not refer to price, but liberty. This software can be freely distributed. Because many people can confuse the concept of free software with freeware (closed-source software freely distributed by the author) the concept of Libre Software was created. Libre is a word used by several Romanic Languages such as Spanish, Portuguese and French. This word does not exist in English, but what it means is free as in "free speech", freedom as a right that a citizen has and not freedom associated with zero cost (Gratis). Open source on the other hand is a movement which emphasizes on source code of software being freely available. It also talks about certain criteria which must exist in the license of software to make it open source. In this book when we used the term open source, we mean FLOSS. In essence the freedom here refers to what an individual developer or user has with the code. It does not refer to a no-charge license. We discuss more details on the various connotations this phrase has in the open source world in the chapters to come. Did you know? The first use of the phrase “free open source software” on Usenet was in a posting on 18 March 1998, just a month after the term “open source” itself was introduced. Did you know? The IBM® DB2 Express-C database is free as in free beer. Check out these Web sites for more details: http://freedb2.com/2009/08/06/db2-express-c-those-who-use-oracle-like-it-a-lot/ http://db2express.com http://tldp.org/HOWTO/DB2-HOWTO/whyexpc9.html 1.4 Advantages and disadvantages of open source Based on the fact that open source software is free and can be seen by everyone has great advantages. But the fact that it is being developed by a nonprofit community has some disadvantages. In this section we discuss the pros and cons of open source software maintenance and development. 1.4.1 Pros Open source software has lower monetary costs as development, support and license costs are fairly minimal when compared to proprietary software. This does tempt many organizations to use open source software in their business model. In fact many companies do business with open source, IBM being one of them. For example, IBM offers a quality service with the Linux operating system. Another company, RedHat is selling the Linux operating system with support services. 26 Getting started with open source development As far as security and reliability goes, open source is a great model because, as many people analyze the source code, a safer and more secure code will be produced. Since open source software has so many people participating in its development, some programs are faster and scale better than the proprietary counterparts. Also depending on usage and need, open source software is also changed by experienced users thereby making code more stable. Open source is also the answer to the incompatible formats in proprietary software, because it only uses open standards, that is, standards that are known or are accessible to all the people. One such example is OpenDocument Text (.odt), which is an open standard for word processor documents. From a corporate perspective, companies that use open source do not have to worry about complicated licensing, and thus, do not suffer the risk of having illegal copies that infringe copyrights. Therefore, they don’t need anti-piracy measures, such as CD keys, product activation and serial keys. Open Source software is community driven and community serving; a large number of bright, and generous developers work openly and with the whole community. For example when an open source program crashes it provides useful information to find the source of the error or to report a possible bug. Open source software is independent of companies and its main authors. If the company goes bankrupt or the authors fail to maintain the program, the code continues to belong to the community. Therefore, many people believe open source software can live by itself. As long as there are passionate contributors from the community, this is indeed the case. 1.4.2 Cons Open source software has been focused to provide solutions to servers rather than to desktop computers. As a result, adoption in the desktop arena is much slower. For example, Linux desktops are still not used as much as Microsoft® Windows®. In addition, many software is not yet compatible with open source. When a user chooses a Linux desktop he has to remove several software that are not supported on Linux, or in some cases, there is no similar nor viable open source application. A good example is the gaming industry, which is still very focused on Windows. Excluding companies that sell open source combined with technical support; proprietary software offers better service and support. The quality and availability of assistance in an open source project is proportional to the interest and use of the program by the community. An open source tool with few users can be poorly documented and have almost no means to help you understand it. 1.5 Open source trends and perspectives The advantages of OSS outweigh its disadvantages, this is why companies are starting to pay close attention to open source. Increasingly, many companies are using open source software tools for development and test; but open source is quickly gaining market share Chapter 1 – Introduction to open source development 27 as an alternative in production environments. A well known example is the LAMP stack – LAMP being Linux, Apache, MySQL® and PHP/Perl/Python. It is arguably the widest adopted software stack for the deployment of Web applications. Many other open source projects that emerged since the 80's are still going strong, with many users and better product quality. This is the case of the Eclipse IDE (Integrated Development Environment). Eclipse was developed by IBM in 2001, and donated to the open source community in 2004. Today, Eclipse is one of the widest IDEs in use worldwide. There are more and more companies whose business model relies on open source. For example, some companies specialize in delivering an integrated and fully tested environment consisting of different open source software like LAMP. The fact that such companies exist is the greatest measure of the success of open source community developed software. Chapter 2 discusses in more detail other business models used in the open source world, and more details about Eclipse too. Other chapters in this book will discuss other successful open source projects in more detail. 1.6 Career path We don't want to undermine your intelligence by making you believe that the number of jobs in OSS is much higher than that for proprietary software. However; though smaller, it is a niche market. Today it would be easier to get a C/C++ programmer job. In order to get developers who have programmed in newer technologies like Python, or Ruby, and who have understood the community, its trends, and its ways of working would certainly take a lot more time and effort. Just as we make correct technology choices for a software solution based on its architecture, organizations need to make choices to find the right fit for the right job. With the growing trends of involvement and usage of OSS in companies the demand for open source developers to take up this work is definitely on the rise. IBM itself has shown a lot of involvement in open source software like Eclipse, Linux, and so on. In summary, OSS jobs are increasing. It’s still a niche area, but its growth potential makes it worth exploring. Needless to say that being an expert in a niche area always calls for a premium salary for oneself. 1.7 Exercises Review the following link to learn about the involvement of IBM in OSS development. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-133183812/history-ibm-open-source.html 1.8 Summary In this chapter you learned about the history of open source and how it evolved over the years. You also learned about the underlying difference between the terms "free software" 28 Getting started with open source development and "open source software". This moved us to discussing some of the advantages and disadvantages of open source software and how working in the open source space could benefit your career in the long term. 1.9 Review questions 1. When was the term "Open source" first used and by who? 2. What does FLOSS stands for? 3. List the pros of FLOSS 4. List the cons of FLOSS 5. Which foundation was started when Netscape Communicator software was made open source? 6. Which of the following open-source projects appears in the 90s? A. EMACS B. XFree86 C. KDE D. Eclipse IDE E. None of the above 7. Who was the founder of the Free Software Foundation? A. Richard Stallman B. Ian Murdock C. Miguel de Icaza D. Linus Torvalds E. None of the above 8. One of the two groups who established the roots of OSS were: A. The founders of the GNU project B. The creators of BSD UNIX C. The founders of the GNOME project D. A & B E. None of the above 9. In Stallman's definition of Free Software, "Free" means: A. Free as in "Free beer" B. Free as in "Free speech" Chapter 1 – Introduction to open source development 29 C. Free as in "Free of charge" D. All of the above E. None of the above 10. In Stallman's definition, Free Software is: A. Freeware B. Libre C. Software that can be modified, studied and distributed with no restriction, but may not be free of charge D. B and C E. None of the above Chapter 2 – Open source business models 2 You've probably heard the saying "There’s no such thing as a free lunch". Do you think this applies to open source? Are the users of open source software getting a free lunch? The answer to this question lies in the famous quote "free as in free speech, not as in free beer" discussed in Chapter 1. If the creators of open source software are giving their users a free lunch, then how do they themselves earn a living or even be profitable? In this chapter we try to understand the answers to this question. In this chapter you will learn about:  The different business models employed by companies (not communities) involved in open source.  How the business models affect you, as a contributor to open source, if any. You might be asking yourself "Why should this matter to me as developer?" Strictly speaking, at this point you can choose not to bother; however, from our experience, this knowledge will help you understand some of the nuances behind why communities and companies do what they do. You may use this knowledge to your advantage, and perhaps use it as a guide towards your success when you start your own open source project! Understanding the economics behind how open source operates can be interesting in itself! 2.1 Open source business models: The big picture An open source business model is a model used by companies that are involved in the development of open source software to keep themselves financially viable and successful. In fact today these companies compete with traditional proprietary software companies for investor’s money on the stock markets. Traditional software companies get revenue by the sale of the software they create, that is, they earn money for each copy of the software sold. As illustrated in Figure 2.1, traditional software business models monetize software by 32 Getting started with open source development either directly selling software products or by providing software development services. Figure 2.1- Business models for Proprietary software Did you know? When IBM sold the first mainframes, the software that was bundled with them was made freely available in open source. Users were allowed to modify and enhance it. How about open source software companies? Stepping back into the evolution of open source software, it is fair enough to say that the initial roots of open source software were sowed by either community projects which had mutual sharing as their main concern (over business ambitions) as in the case of the GNU project, or funded by government contracts as in the case of BSD UNIX. However as open source software usage progressed to the extent that many of them were viable alternatives to their commercial counterparts, commercial software companies became interested in finding ways by which they could promote, develop and monetize open source software. During this period many startup companies emerged, such as Red Hat. Red Hat focuses on the development and promotion of the Linux open source software, building their revenue and profits around it. These companies began to explore new economic models, different from traditional commercial software to succeed in the competitive software market. This phase – companies involved in the development and promotion of open source software – has lasted for around a decade or more now. Today there are probably very few domains of product software from operating systems to Business Intelligence, in which there are no commercial companies promoting open source communities and their software. Studies have been carried out by groups to find out the various economic models employed by these companies. The top four models are illustrated in Figure 2.2. Chapter 2 – Open source business models 33 Figure 2.2- Business models for open source software Companies that develop and promote open source software are sometimes referred to as Commercial Open Source Software companies (COSS) or Professional Open Source Software companies (POSS). The following sections describe in detail each of the four business models shown in Figure 2.2. 2.2 Dual licensing In this model, the open source software is licensed by the POSS company under both, an open source license (using GPL only, a license to discuss in detail in Chapter 3) as well as a commercial license. In this model the POSS company generates revenue when it sells the open source software under a commercial license. Why would a consumer of open source software pay the POSS company to obtain the same software which is also available free of charge? This is needed when the consumer wants to link his own proprietary software to the open source software, but does not want this to cause its proprietary software to become open source as it would under the GPL license. According to the GPL license, when one accepts GPL licensed source code and links it with any other code (dynamic linking or static linking), the linked software also becomes open source. Thus the only way proprietary software vendors can link with GPL software without causing their own software to become GPL is by paying the POSS company. The POSS company then gives the same software to the proprietary software company under a license that excludes the need for the latter to make their proprietary software open source when they link to it. Figure 2.3 summarizes how dual licensing business model works. 34 Getting started with open source development Figure 2.3 - Dual licensing business model As a developer, you may want to consider this if you are planning to make code contributions to an open source project that has dual license. You will be giving the POSS company the right to make money directly out of your contribution by commercially licensing your code. Of course if the POSS company plans to accept your contributions they will ask you to sign a legal document which states that you have given them the rights to do so. MySQL, JBoss and SugarCRM are examples of POSS companies that employ the dual licensing business model. 2.3 Split open source software / commercial products In this model, there is a core portion of the software which is available as open source. This core provides the base functionality. Then there are other portions or extensions that are built on top of or extend the functionality provided by the core. The latter is licensed under commercial or proprietary licenses and sold like typical proprietary software. Figure 2.4 illustrates how this model works. Chapter 2 – Open source business models 35 Figure 2.4 - Split open source software / commercial products business model Many POSS companies choose the Apache or Mozilla open source license when they want to follow this business model, since these licenses allow this kind of intermixing where some parts can be open source and other parts proprietary. This model is used by many commercial software companies that participate in open source including IBM. In fact, IBM is an acknowledged leader in this space. Does this mean IBM is a POSS company? A company is considered a POSS when most of its revenue comes from open source software sales. Since this is not the case for IBM it would not be considered a POSS company by that definition. Probably the best example of IBM’s successful usage of this open source business model is Eclipse – the world’s default IDE and tooling platform. As discussed in Chapter 1, before IBM donated Eclipse to the open source community, a number of proprietary Java IDE’s competed with each other; yet as a whole, Java IDE’s had a very small portion of the IDE market share compared to Microsoft’s Visual Studio. When IBM open sourced its VisualAge family of IDE products as Eclipse, it became the de- facto standard and was widely accepted by all. This led to a massive increase in the overall Java IDE market share compared to Visual Studio. Thus, IBM chose the right strategy with Eclipse, and is probably the biggest beneficiary financially - IBM Rational’s development tools which are commercial software products have seen a great uptake since they are based on Eclipse. If you are a developer planning to contribute to an open source project under this business model, you can be certain that your code will never be licensed under a commercial license, since it would be part of the core, which must be open source. 2.4 Product specialists A POSS company that nurtured an open source software project either by creating it from the start or contributing and maintaining it, can generate revenue from it by providing training and consulting services to the customers of the open source software. This is illustrated in Figure 2.5. 36 Getting started with open source development Figure 2.5 - The product specialists' business model If the open source software caters to a domain that is very complex, and it achieves good adoption, there can be significant revenue to be made from providing training and consulting services. For example, this may be the case with business intelligence software (as compared to wiki software). By the very nature of being the creators and maintainers of the software, it follows that they would be the experts, and hence the best trainers and consultants in the market. The POSS can achieve this position with minimal spending on marketing efforts. 2.5 Platform providers In a not so distant past software systems were monolithic. In those days one probably bought the entire system from a single vendor who provided all the software and support needed. However these are the days of concepts like Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) where software systems are built from multiple components from different software vendors and integrated into one system. And what if those multiple components were all open source? Open source software has permeated every domain of product software. Today many software systems in production run entire software stacks consisting of open source software. However, as you can imagine, customers building this type of systems have to face many challenging decisions: Which open source software receives community support? Which ones have a diminishing number of contributors and is on the way out?. How can you determine if a given open source software will work well with another one? How can these software be integrated taking into account different versions? How many resources should be allocated to test and verify the integrated system and then upgrade and patch it in the right manner so that it still works?. Finding the right answer to these questions can be a nightmare. For example let's say that a patch of open source software X needs Java 1.5; however, open source software Y, which is also part of the system will work only with Java 1.4. By now, you probably understand why a customer would be willing to pay a company to deliver a tested and verified system made up of different open source software. This is the reason the platform providers business model came into existence. Figure 2.6 illustrates this idea. Chapter 2 – Open source business models 37 Figure 2.6 - The platform providers' business model An example of a POSS company using this business model is Zend, "the PHP company". Zend provides a platform fully tested to develop PHP applications. 2.6 Business model relationship to license It is interesting that when we analyze the above mentioned business models, the relationship these models have is vis-à-vis to open source licenses. This is illustrated in Figure 2.7. In the bottom quadrants, the business model is tied to the license of the open source software. Dual licensing applies only when the open source software is GPL- licensed, and Split Open Source / Commercial products when the open source software is Mozilla-based. However the business models in the top quadrant have no bearing on the license of the open source software itself. 38 Getting started with open source development Figure 2.7 - Business model relationship to open source software license 2.7 Open source business model and proprietary software Customers, startup companies and IT departments are finding it difficult to justify the licensing costs of proprietary software they use, and have been looking at open source software as a cost-reduction alternative. This has taken open source software adoption to new levels especially in segments like Web applications. In order to remain competitive, several proprietary software vendors have evolved their strategies in this area. A widely used strategy is to offer no-charge versions of their fee- based products. The source code of these no-charge versions remains close. A typical example is with Database Management Systems (DBMS). Established DBMS vendors such as IBM, Oracle® and Microsoft compete today with open source DBMSs like MySQL and PostgreSQL by offering "Express" editions of their popular fee-based DBMS systems. The Express editions are free of charge, and by default have no customer support. This means that if you run into a problem such as a defect in the product, the vendor will not provide you with any support. However, vendors often optionally offer support for a fee. Thus proprietary software vendors are using the same approach as the open source business model – not charging for the software itself but generating revenue by providing support. In addition to customer support revenue, proprietary vendors view this as an opportunity for adoption and upgrade to fee-based versions in the future. For example a startup company in its initial stages may not be in a position to spend lots of money to purchase software licenses; however, if the company grows, they would need more sophisticated product features which are generally not available in the free versions or on open source software. Therefore, an obvious choice for these companies would be to upgrade to a fee-based version of the proprietary software. Chapter 2 – Open source business models 39 To an extent, Express editions have not seen significant adoption due to the customer's perception that these editions are nothing more than crippled software with upgrade paths to the fee-based versions. And though this may be true in some cases such as Oracle XE and Microsoft SQL Server® Express which place a 2GB hard limit on the amount of data that can be stored; other companies like IBM with its DB2 Express-C database product, do provide more flexibility. Did you know? IBM DB2 Express-C database server does not provide any restriction on the amount of data you can store. It can run on Linux, Windows, and the Mac OS, and can be installed on hardware of any size. Applications developed for DB2 Express-C will work with no modification on other editions of DB2, should you need to upgrade, because DB2 Express- C is built using the same code base as the other DB2 editions. For more information visit ibm.com/db2/express Did you know? When Oracle bought Sun Microsystems in 2009, MySQL became an Oracle product since MySQL had been bought by Sun a few years earlier. At the time of writing, Oracle has not made it clear what are its plans for MySQL, but there are interesting comments here: http://freedb2.com/2009/09/22/ellison-oracle-does-not-compete-with-mysql-mysql- disagrees/ In conclusion, using an Express version does have its merits when the product offers you low cost optional support, flexibility of use, and an easy upgrade path to more sophisticated editions in the future as your needs grow. 2.8 Summary This chapter started with an explanation about the open source software ecosystem, and how it generates money to sustain itself. It then explained the different business models that exist in the world of open source, and how choosing a model can impact you as a contributor to open source software communities. Finally, we looked at "Express" versions of proprietary software as an alternative for companies to start with no licensing cost, the option for low cost customer support, and the possibility to easily upgrade to a version with more features. 2.9 Exercises Review the following article which provides a brilliant analogy about a POSS company and bee-keeping. http://wiki.pentaho.com/display/BEEKEEPER/The+Beekeeper 40 Getting started with open source development 2.10 Review questions 1. Name a well-known database company that uses the dual licensing business model. 2. In which business model would the Eclipse project and its various plug-ins fall under? 3. What are Professional Open Source Software Companies? 4. Describe how DB2 Express-C is different from its competitors like Oracle XE or Microsoft SQL Server Express. 5. What is the value proposition from businesses using the Platform Providers' Business Model? 6. Which of the following is not one of the top business models used in open source: A. Dual licensing B. Platform Providers C. OS Providers D. All of the above E. None of the above 7. Which of the following business models require specific licenses? A. Split open source / Commercial products B. Platform providers C. OS Providers D. All of the above E. None of the above 8. Which of the following is a characteristic of DB2 Express-C? A. DB2 Express-C is a free database server by IBM B. DB2 Express-C has no limitation on the database size or the number of users C. DB2 Express-C can run on Linux, Windows and the Mac OS D. All of the above E. None of the above 9. What are the advantages of the express versions of some commercial products like DB2 Express-C? A. It's free B. It has optional fee-based support when your company grows C. It provides an easy upgrade path when your company grows Chapter 2 – Open source business models 41 D. All of the above E. None of the above 10. A company using the "Product Specialists" business model: A. Does not spend a lot of money in marketing B. Uses this model because it delivers complex OSS software in a large market C. Relies on its expertise to deliver training given that it developed the software D. All of the above E. None of the above Chapter 3 – Licensing 3 In earlier chapters you were introduced to the various business models employed by a company involved in open source, and several open source licenses were mentioned. But what makes a software license open source? This chapter provides an answer to this question. In this chapter you will learn about:  The tenets of intellectual property, copyright and the intents of an open source license.  An explanation of what makes a license an open source license  A brief description of some of the most commonly used open source licenses  Things to keep in mind while choosing a license for a software 3.1 Intellectual property, copyright and licensing: The big picture Intellectual Property (IP) are legally protected rights that one has over new ideas or creations. Common types of intellectual property include copyrights, trademarks, patents, industrial design rights and trade secrets. Copyright gives the creator of the original work exclusive rights in terms of usage, distribution and customization of the work. Some of the privileges copyright provides to the author of software include:  The right to produce and sell copies of the work  The right to create derivative works  The right to sell, transfer or reassign any of the rights granted by copyright to others The transfer of rights by the author partly or wholly at his own terms is what we refer to as licensing. The term license means permission. The copyright holder, or licensor, grants another person, known as the licensee, specific permissions to use the work. Figure 3.1 depicts this relationship between licensor, licensee and license. It also shows that a license is a subset of the privileges that the Copyright Act grants the licensor. The 44 Getting started with open source development licensor permits the licensee to use these privileges as agreed between the two parties in the license. Intellectual Property Copyright License Licensee Licensor / Copyright Holder Figure 3.1: Relationship between licensor, licensee and license 3.2 Open source licensing This section provides a brief history about open source licensing, its intent, and a brief description of commonly used licenses. 3.2.1 History of open source licensing The open source software movement traces its history to the formation of the Free Software Foundation ("FSF") in 1985 by Richard Stallman. As discussed in Chapter 1, Free Software is more of an ideology that emphasizes the freedom users have with the source code and not with the price one pays for the software. In essence, free software is an attempt to guarantee certain rights for both, users and developers. These freedoms include:  Freedom to execute the program for any reason  Freedom to examine the source code, see how it works and change it to do what you would like it to do  Freedom to redistribute the source and keep the money generated from it  Freedom to modify and redistribute the modified source code In order to guarantee these freedoms the GNU General Public License (GPL) was created. In short any software licensed under GPL must include the source code. Any modifications made to a GPL source code will also be licensed under GPL. This was to ensure that software once "opened" to the community could not be "closed" at a later time. Chapter 3 – Licensing 45 In 1998 a non-profit institution called Open Source Initiative (OSI) defined the term "open source software" to emphasize a break with the anti-business past associated with GNU to place a new emphasis in the community on the possibilities of extending the free software model to the commercial world. The OSI does not define a specific license as GPL but lays down the pre-requisites of the distribution terms of open source software. It thereby accepts various licenses whose distribution terms comply with the Open Source Definition (OSD). There are ten criteria mentioned at the OSI Web site (http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd). The main intentions for the OSD are described in the article "Open source licensing, Part 1: The intent" by Martin Streicher and are summarized in Table 3.1 below. Intention Explanation 1 Licensees are free to use open This basically means that the licensee need not source software for any purpose justify the usage of the open source software. whatsoever. 2 Licensees are free to make copies of This implies that the licensee can redistribute open source software and are free to the software at a cost or free of charge. distribute those copies without payment of royalties to a licensor. 3 Licensees are free to create This allows the licensee to modify the open derivative works of open source source software and then redistribute it with or software and are free to distribute without charge. The licensee is in no way liable those works without payment of to pay any amount to the licensor for this royalties to a licensor. neither can the licensor pose any restrictions on the derivative works. A pre-requisite for intention 3 to occur is the pre-existence of intention 4. 4 Licensees are free to access and This means the source code is freely available use the source code of open source software. 5 Licensees are free to combine open This gives the licensee the ability to mix open source and other software. source software with other software. Table 3.1 - Intentions of open source software We review in the next section how the GPL and MIT licenses meet the above intents of open source software. 46 Getting started with open source development 3.2.2 Commonly used open source licenses Though there are over 50 OSI approved licenses most of the licenses fall under two categories:  Academic licenses, such as the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) license, allow software to be used for any purpose. Software obtained via an academic license can be freely changed, sold, redistributed, sublicensed, and combined with other software.  Reciprocal licenses like the GNU General Public License (GPL), also allow software to be used for any purpose, however it enforces that the changed or modified software must also be licensed under the exact terms as the original license. A GPL licensed code does not allow proprietary software to link to it. It also does not permit redistribution with software having a GPL non-compatible license. Also redistribution of the derivative works need to be with GPL. On the other hand MIT licensed software allows all of it. It permits proprietary code to link to it, redistribution with non-MIT license software and redistribution of derivative works with non-MIT license. Interestingly, they both are open source software licenses as they follow the open source definition specified by the OSI. Table 3.2 compares the GPL versus the MIT license. GPL license MIT license Allow proprietary code to No Yes link to open source code Allow redistribution of No Yes software with other code that has another license Allow redistribution of Yes. Derivative work becomes open Yes derivative work source with GPL license Table 3.2 - Comparing the GPL vs. the MIT reciprocal licenses Let's take an even closer look at the GPL and MIT licenses by reviewing excerpts of each license as shown in Listing 3.1 and 3.2 respectively. We will verify each of the licenses satisfy the five intentions explained earlier in Table 3.1 You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work -- provided that you -- cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works. Chapter 3 – Licensing 47 But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it. Listing 3.1 - An excerpt of the GNU license The sentence "You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work" indicates that licensees are free to access, and use open source software for any purpose and that they are free to create and distribute derivative works (Intention 1, 3, 4 and 5). In the same sentence, the clause "copy and distribute such modifications or work" further indicates that licensees are free to make copies of the open source software (Intention 2). Copyright (c) year, copyright holders Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: < text that follows has been removed for the sake of brevity > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. Listing 3.2 - An excerpt of the MIT license The phrase "permission is hereby granted, free of charge" clearly indicates that MIT permits licensees to access and use open source software for any purpose whatsoever (Intention 1). Further the phrase "rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense and/or sell copies" combined with "free of charge" indicates that licensees are free to make and distribute copies, access the source code, create derivative works and combine open source and other software without payment of royalties (Intention 2, 3, 4 and 5). In conclusion, both GPL and MIT are valid open source licenses as they satisfy the same intentions though through different means, and are thereby best suited in different situations. Did you know? The IBM Public License (IPL) was IBM's first open source license. The Common Public License (CPL) is essentially the next version of the IPL. In 2009 CPL was superseded by the Eclipse Public License (EPL). 3.3 Choosing the right license By now you must be feeling more of a lawyer and less of a developer. Yet, all of this information is very relevant to you: It can help you avoid a lawsuit. An interesting licensing 48 Getting started with open source development violation is the case between the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and Cisco. In 2004 a German court ordered Cisco to stop selling its wireless routers because it was in violation of the terms and conditions of the GPL license - Cisco’s products were using GPL-licensed software in their code, but not providing free availability of their source code. Another case of license violation happened early in 2009 when Microsoft was found in violation of the GPL license on the Hyper-V code it released to the open source community. More information can be found at this link: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/23/microsoft_hyperv_gpl_violation/. So what is the right open source license to use for a given software? There is no magic formula but some of the things to consider are listed below:  Is the work in question a derived work? Or would the work be redistributed with other open source software? If so, what are the license terms you have agreed as a licensee?  Do you want the software to be revenue generating? Review the different open source business models as described earlier in Chapter 2.  Do you want access to use licensees’ contributions? How do you add this clause to your license?  Review the licenses in the OSI website - http://www.opensource.org/licenses to see if any of the existing and approved licenses of OSI would be good for you to use. This and several other factors are things to consider while choosing an appropriate license for the software in question. Depending on the scope of the project you could get into legal discussions to help you chose an appropriate license. 3.4 Exercises The OSI categorizes various approved licenses. Review these categories and the licenses' terms and conditions at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category 3.5 Summary In this chapter you learned about the concept of Intellectual Property and how it related to a license. You also learned about the relationship between a license, licensor and licensee. Next, the chapter explained what makes a license an open source license, and provided a description and comparison between the BSD, GPL and MIT licenses. Finally the chapter provided questions that would help you choose the most appropriate open source license for your needs. 3.6 Review questions 1. What is required for OSI license approval? 2. Why is it important for developers to know about OSS licenses? Chapter 3 – Licensing 49 3. Name 3 popular OSS licenses 4. How come the MIT and GPL licenses are both OSS licenses even though they have contradictory items? 5. Name the two main categories of OSS licenses 6. Is the Eclipse Public License approved by OSI? A. Yes B. No 7. If I modify a program licensed under GPL and distribute the object code of the modified program for free, must I make the source code available? A. Yes B. No 8. Under MIT, can you link proprietary code to open source code? A. Yes B. No 9. Intellectual property and copyright are synonyms. True or false? A. True B. False 10. Which of the following is not an OSS license? A. GPL B. BSD C. MIT D. EPL E. None of the above 50 Getting started with open source development Chapter 4 – Community driven development 4 Open source software is often developed by a group of people who normally have no governing authority or organizational support. What are the strategies and methods they follow? Which tools do they use at the various phases of the software development life cycle? Are these tools available for free? This chapter provides the answers to all of the above questions. In this chapter you will learn about:  Various tools used in an open source software development project.  Processes of designing and writing the programs.  Managing different versions of the source code and creating new builds.  Methods of testing and issues tracking.  How open source software is released. 4.1 Community driven development: The big picture A community is a diverse group of people sharing their thoughts, ideas, work, and experiences, at a common place. The term “community” as used in this chapter is not an exception to this definition. In the software industry, community driven development broadly means an initiative under which a group of technologists work together with a common vision of producing open source software. Most of the OSS development communities who are successful today, organize themselves in a similar way as a professional organization or proprietary software company. This is why in a well structured OSS community; you can find each member has a job role within the team. Groups of people performing similar jobs, form sub teams within the community. Figure 4.1 gives you an overview of such a community, where multiple sub teams collaborate to develop open source software. 52 Getting started with open source development Figure 4.1 – Community driven software development As shown in the figure, the developers' group is responsible for writing code for different independent modules of the software. The builders’ group takes these modules from the developers and put them together to build a new version of the software. These software builds are internally tested by the testers' group. In case a bug or failure is found, they report back to the appropriate developer who debugs the code and includes a proper fix. This is an iterative process that repeats itself until the product satisfies all its requirements and becomes error free to the maximum possible extent. Once the objectives of the project are met, the release management group packs together the final version (final build) of the software with all the necessary documents, and then hands it over to the customers. OSS development communities, especially those which are self driven, offer their team members the flexibility of shuffling their job roles. This means that a developer may perform the role of a tester, a tester may work as a build team member, and so on. Most importantly, these communities always keep the door open for the users (customers), so that they can also contribute effectively into the project and become part of the community. Software development tools are a collection of programs that help with specific tasks during the software development life cycle. They are normally used for project management, and to perform repetitive, and time consuming tasks. There exist both, proprietary and open source development tools. For an open source project, it should be Chapter 4 – Community driven development 53 obvious that the latter one is the preferred choice. There are also a few instances, where communities use their self developed tools. The next sections describe the various processes and tools used by the OSS development communities in detail. 4.1.1 Developers' group: Software design and development You can think of software design as the blueprint that defines the architecture and behavior of a product, and coding as the process of implementing the design. A community driven software development typically starts as a project to address problems generic across the society. These problems are technically termed pain points, and include a list of requirements that the software is expected to fulfill. The designers’ group, which in many cases is also part of the developers' group, takes these requirements as input and writes algorithms which are cost effective and optimal in terms of performance. Software designers should be the most experienced and knowledgeable members of the community as their job requires thorough understanding of the entire system. They also must be aware of every alternative to overcome all the probable barriers of implementing the design. Following are the two most important points that a designer must analyze closely:  Hardware platform: The designer must know the capabilities of the hardware, with which the software is going to interact. Resources like number and speed of the processors, I/O device response time, available system cache, primary memory and secondary storage space etc. are the most important concerns.  Operating system: The operating system (OS) provides the environment for running applications. Process and thread handling mechanisms vary from one OS to another. Moreover, the algorithms of job scheduling, CPU time allocation, avoiding deadlock situations are also different. The designer must take these factors into account. A perfect design should be self explanatory and easy to understand. All the algorithms and flowcharts should include detailed explanations and other necessary documentations including time-space complexity and the expected behaviors of the system under best and worst scenarios. Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a widely accepted standard used for software design. It allows a designer to describe the structure, behavior, and interactions among different sub units of the system with the help of various simple diagrams. Following design, the software development life cycle enters the coding phase. At this stage, the design is first sub divided into multiple smaller units. Different development groups code these sub units separately as individual modules. Coding is the process of translating the steps of an algorithm, into multiple computer instructions, with the help of a programming language. Choosing the proper language for writing the source code is critical. A community should always encourage using languages 54 Getting started with open source development which have gained industry wide trust and with which the development team is well versed. Some communities prefer using interpreted languages, since they consume less time to create the executable modules as compared to the compiled languages. Automatic code generators are often helpful in developing big and complex code snippets. iCodeGenerator is an open source code generator offered by SourceForge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/codegenerator/). Transition between the design and code generation phases in a community driven development typically tend to overlap with each other in a project. Developers sometimes start coding parts of a system, while other parts are yet to be designed. Although, this kind of approach of running two phases in parallel saves time; it may result in duplication of effort in the event of a change in design. 4.1.1.1 Version control Software development is an incremental process where functionality is added or removed one by one. At any given time the code of different modules may undergo frequent modifications by different individuals or groups which create different versions of the same code. Version control (or revision control) is the mechanism to manage all of these versions in an effective way. There are two varieties of version control systems:  Centralized Version Control System (CVCS) – This is perhaps the most widely used version control system to-date. It works in a centralized manner which means that developers and testers around the world have to connect to a server, where a central repository for the entire project is stored. Concurrent Versions System (CVS) is a very well known open source CVCS (http://ftp.gnu.org/non-gnu/cvs/). To get a private copy of a particular file, you first need to check it out from the repository. Once done with your changes, you may commit or save your work into the repository by checking the file in. CVS will automatically increment the version (or revision) number by 1 and record all the necessary information about the change in its log. If someone else had already committed some other changes to the same file, CVS will automatically merge your changes with those of the other person. This system also allows a user to track back the old versions of a file. By comparing two successive versions of a file, you can easily determine modifications introduced. One of the main drawbacks of CVCS is that developers may interfere with each other's working environment. For example, a small bug injected through a code change, becomes a big issue when it causes various other modules of the entire code base to fail.  Decentralized / Distributed Version Control System (DVCS) – This type of version control allows a developer or tester to create their own code branch, that is, they can maintain versions of the code in a decentralized manner. A DVCS provides all the functionalities of CVCS, plus the flexibility of creating a local Chapter 4 – Community driven development 55 repository. Git, Bazaar, Monotone, Mercurial and Darcs are a few examples of open source DVCS software. Did you know? During the early days of Linux® kernel development, Linus Torvalds used CVS for version management. In 2002, Linus switched to BitKeeper; however, since BitKeeper became proprietary in 2005, Linus started writing a completely new DVCS, called git. The official web site of git (http://git-scm.com/) describes it as – “... a free & open source, distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Every Git clone is a full-fledged repository with complete history and full revision tracking capabilities, not dependent on network access or a central server. Branching and merging are fast and easy to do.” 4.1.2 Builders' group: Software building Programs are normally written in smaller units that are compiled before they can be executed. The resulting object modules are then bound together in a process known as linking to form a complete software system. Software building refers to the sum of compiling and linking all the source code of a project. Software building is a dynamic process: People constantly add, delete and modify the source code files under the project’s central repository. To make these changes effective, the modified code needs to be recompiled and linked regularly. Development communities generally have a separate build team to carry out this task. It is important to mention that the build process recompiles only those source code files which were modified since the previous build was released. For the rest of the elements which remained unchanged, the older compiled modules are picked up. Figure 4.3 illustrates this fact. A B C D 0 0 0 0 Build 0 (A0 + B0 + C0 + D0) 1 1 1 1 Build 1 (A1 + B1 + C1 + D1) 2 2 Build 2 (A2 + B1 + C2 + D1) 3 Build 3 (A3 + B1 + C2 + D1) Central Repository Figure 4.3 – Software builds 56 Getting started with open source development In the figure, the central repository contains four source code files A, B, C and D. The base version of these files is illustrated with the number zero, so A0 represents the base version of source code file A for example. When compiled and linked they create ‘Build 0’. On the next iteration, all the files were modified and their versions were upgraded to 1. Since all the files were modified, all are compiled and linked to create ‘Build 1’. On the net iteration, only source code file A and C are modified creating second versions of them (A2 and C2). As a result when creating ‘Build 2’, only A2 and C2 are compiled, and then linked with B1 and D1. Similarly, ‘Build 3’ is created based on the newly compiled A3 and precompiled B1, C2 and D1. Berczuk and Appleton have divided software builds into the following three distinct categories in their book “Software Configuration Management Patterns” , and an additional paper with Konieczka, “Build Management for an Agile Team” :  Private build – A private build is a new version of a developer’s personal branch in a DVCS. Naturally, this type of build is only visible to its owner and he can access it locally even when working offline.  Integration build – An integration build is created from the compilation and linking of the main project branch and is available to all within the community for use.  Release build – A release build is the final version of the software to be shipped. It is basically a snapshot of a stable integration build which users use as a product. Frequent builds allow the source code to undergo less number of modifications. This reduces the effort needed for debugging and fixing the new errors. On the other hand, the build process involves a lot of repetitive tasks which can be automated by means of open source tools like make, ant, maven, and scons. So far we have discussed about the building process in a project environment. However, since the code is open, at anytime users can tailor it at their own premises and get customized versions of the product. A later section discusses how you can rebuild and install open source software after changing its source code. 4.1.3 Testers' group: Software Testing Software testing as defined by Glenford J. Myers in his book “The Art of Software Testing” , is “the process of executing a program with the intent of finding errors". Conventionally, there are two varieties of software testing – black box and white box.  Black box testing: In this type of testing, the actual output of the code is compared with the expected result. Testers are supposed to feed the system with a set of inputs, and note down the corresponding outputs. In case of any mismatch between the obtained and expected results they report it to the developer without analyzing the code.  White box testing: In contrast to black box, in this type of testing, testers look into the source code of the product and carry out some investigation in the event of Chapter 4 – Community driven development 57 failures. This requires a developer to put less effort and time for analyzing the error before fixing it. With open source software, every person, no matter whether he is a member of the community or not, gets equal opportunity of performing white box testing as the source code is accessible to all. Testing also requires planning and a proper infrastructure. At different stages of development, the code undergoes various levels of testing:  Unit testing: This level is used to test individually each of the units that make up a software  Integration testing: In this level, all the stable modules are integrated with each other to form the entire system, and tested as a whole.  System testing: This testing ensures the software is operational and satisfying all its requirements.  Alpha testing: In this stage, the software is given to the users internal to the community, to judge its performance against practical deployment.  Beta testing: After fixing the errors discovered during alpha testing, the community releases the software to the external users as a beta version, with a disclaimer that it may fail in unplanned use cases. The community expects external users to provide feedback about these unplanned scenarios. Small scale open source software without any organizational governance may not undergo formal testing. However, this software tends to be quickly adopted because it provides a solution to a common problem. When a bug is encountered, the user will normally poke through the code to make things work again, or he can customize it to his own needs. This is the way in which many people become members of OSS communities. When the software becomes so useful and with enough followers, some users take the software to the next level by enhancing it, and formally releasing it to the community. OSS development often spends less time and budget to test their product. Rather, they leverage the community to test and fix the code themselves; and to provide feedback for new functionality. In addition, this unique approach makes open source software very robust. 4.1.4 Release management group: Packaging Users give preference to a product that is well packaged. In an open source software, the core item of a package is the source code. A standard package includes accessories like an installation guide, a user manual, and other information. Packages of software written in high level languages like C or C++ that require compilation of the source code, optionally may contain a pre-compiled executable version of the product. All of these elements are put together within a single directory and compressed into a single file. The format of the compressed file depends on the operating system on which the software is meant to run. On Linux or UNIX®, packages are presented in formats like.tar,.gz etc. 58 Getting started with open source development which are created using compression utilities like tar, gzip, bgzip, bzip2. On Windows®, the distribution package is zip. If the software has operating system specific versions, each of them is released in separate packages. Once the package is prepared, it goes through a small test by a few developers to ensure the final version of the product can be decompressed, installed, and works correctly. Then it is published in one or more internet Web sites for download. In some cases, if there is budget, CDs or DVDs can be ordered online at no charge. 4.1.5 Release management group: Releasing Releasing software means making a completely new or upgraded version of a software available to the users. A new release introduces a product into the market and an upgraded version provides fixes for errors found in a previous released version and optionally adds new features. To distinguish the versions from each other, each OSS community follows its own convention of using unique numbers for ever

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser