Begriffsdefinition.pdf

Organizational ⑮ Behavior Classical theories · · Why do we Advantages have of organizations ? division of labour : - · · two different of of division meanings Organization of labour : reduction use : easily be realized of abilities exchange recoordination more or...

Organizational ⑮ Behavior Classical theories · · Why do we Advantages have of organizations ? division of labour : - · · two different of of division meanings Organization of labour : reduction use : easily be realized of abilities exchange recoordination more organization can : - institutional instrumental - theories labour reduction adequate - benefitting from divison of a learning effects - Disadvantages risks complexity cost - · reducing - A : company (are costs anization is an has an company A : transaction to org organization influenced by seeing humans as predictable machine) ↳ decision workers was making ability of constantly reduced ↳ human being input factor/organization - from the machine" a - - Bureaucracy (Max Weber) Core : statement Proposition : Rules ! : Bureaucracy Classical Management (Fayol) Main concern : Coordination : structuring Management into of the entire company planning organization : organizations to Other leads to Obedience " set order" - superior is , , management, Coordination & control single-life system a communication - Taylors Scientific Management : analysed different has of a similarities En strengths of among the theores a weaknesses of the one metal work but motivation , best : assumed that the experiment way principle multi-line , , Neglects , " separation system money , the social dimension! : clear , defind , high from arbitrary ↳ of , rationally the planning the knowledge is from the military fild of engineering , Hierarchically structured Organizations , machines' rational : the mechanistic new central ple manual as En work processes humans think and pet via (rarely horizontal) hierarchy - ans mechanistic view : efficiency focus control interconnected , safety behavior underestimation of no , the on innovation , human little complexity of organizations Alienation Eo flexibility aspect , the " trust o ③ game -> frust game = Sequential game prisonnes dilema- simultaneous En In both Mirrational behavior Solution - predicts what No , because don't · higher payoff a (1 Backward induction : recipacity no may do what I guesses people gamble who were equally ready to trust another person , than those who gamble expectation (expectation based theory) social · trustQ no trust behavior risk V · concept lead to can game favours rational behavior games dilerma" sequential prisonnes " expectations ? No because , trust ? No , game) because why trust En (should ? the game (= origin of investment . people trust & too much ↳ ex recippcity of (underestimate too little trust much less than informs Experience in they continues -> the trustworthiness t cynicism after their belief) do Rfoedback asymetric way an game tefrequent non-ze is trust can decrease cynicism Efficiency · concerns ? En Are People just seeking to No , because · Relational money anticipated emotions immediate emotions - La anticipated When do we trust ? depends - Lex You . both like altruistic to Effect of larger societys - - - - The hidden cost What are the of control effects of excessive control Horesty Evidence for expressive : - using - . they more societies trust : anonymus business is harder to potential consequenges ? the , immediate relationship a can to be norm one itself ? enotio es did ! trigger nice , expressive we concerns are more sometimes adid we willing to hypothetical performance performance trust : what they got People for a incur game but People punishment when the trust rate should trust fairness is wer actively would mean that people : too costy can (wirfel) - and Many games to Recipa at - level of trust depends on how well norms depending lied violated carry the cost symbolize distrust (controll-low trust) all a die number) and ! lasty are - is more than in actual - benefits monitoring systems costly : performance to -> maintain distrust has it's consequences (nobody sees to hold a badman) , people are more in -Decreased business Signalling predict trust trusting itself of act about the decision exposure mere betting rate feel about feel ? beggar) Increased business equal In payoff the total about the expressive do I did not victim , than to an Die-under-the-Cup paradigm get money than gow cooperation for complex instruments - ex . people En - identified As societies : Spiderman relationship (ex a - an status How How do I emotions relationship on : : but , than larger rate is (not instrumental) It's not about the concerns - - trust maximie on are carried their in the firm number