Developmental Dysplasia Of The Hip PDF

Document Details

SmoothProse

Uploaded by SmoothProse

Near East University Hospital

Tags

developmental dysplasia of the hip pediatric orthopedics hip disorders

Summary

This presentation describes developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), including its pathoanatomy, etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, imaging, treatment options, and complications. The presentation covers different treatment approaches based on the patient's age and the severity of the condition, focusing on both non-operative and surgical interventions.

Full Transcript

NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ORTOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY DEPT. DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP Developmental Dysplasia 2 of the Hip  DDH - preferred term  Teratogenic hips  Subluxation  Dislocation-usually posterosuperior (reducible vs...

NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ORTOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY DEPT. DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP Developmental Dysplasia 2 of the Hip  DDH - preferred term  Teratogenic hips  Subluxation  Dislocation-usually posterosuperior (reducible vs irreducible)  Dysplasia Pathoanatomy 3  Ranges from mild dysplasia --> frank dislocation  Bony changes  Shallow acetabulum  Typically on acetabular side  Femoral anteversion Pathoanatomy 4  Soft tissue changes  Usually secondary to prolonged subluxation or dislocation  Intraarticular  Labrum Inverted + adherent to capsule (closed reduction with inverted labrum assoc with increased Avascular Necrosis)  Ligamentum teres Hypertrophied + lengthened  Pulvinar Fibrofatty tissue migrating into acetabulum Pathoanatomy 5  Soft Tissue (Intraarticular)  Transverse acetabular ligament  Contracted  Limbus  Fibrous tissue formed from capsular tissue interposed between everted labrum and acetabular rim  Extraarticular  Tight adductors (adductor longus)  Iliopsoas  Obstacles to reduction 6 Extraarticular Tight iliopsoas and adductors Intraarticular Labrum Ligamentum teres Transverse acetabular ligament Pulvinar Redundant capsule (hourglass) +/- limbus Etiology and 7 Epidemiology  Multifactorial  Genetics and Syndromes  Ehler’s Danlos  Arthrogryposis  Larsen’s syndrome  Intrauterine environmental factors  Teratogens  Positioning (oligohydramnios)  Neurologic Disorders  Spina Bifida Risk Factors 8 1/1,000 born with dislocated hip = with subluxation or dysplasia 80% Female First born children Family history Intermarriage Oligohydramnios Torticollis or vertebral deformities Diagnosis 9  Newborn screening  Ortolani’s and Barlow’s maneuvers with a thorough history and physical  Warm, quiet environment with removal of diaper  Head to toe exam to detect any associated conditons (Torticollis, Ligamentous Laxity etc.)  Baseline Neuro and Spine Exam Diagnosis 10  Key physical findings Asymmetry Limb length- Galeazzi Abduction ROM Skin folds Limp Waddilng gait / hyperlordosis - bilateral involvement Ortolani’s Maneuver 11 * After 3 months of age tests become negative Barlow’s Maneuver 12 Diagnosis 13  Some cases still missed  At risk groups should be further screened  AAP  Recs further imaging (e.g. US) if exam is “inconclusive” AND  First degree relative + female  Breech  Positive provocative maneuver (Ortolani or Barlow)  Referral to Orthopaedist Imaging 14  Ultrasound  Operator dependent  X-rays  Femoral head ossification center  4 -7 months  CT  MRI  Arthrograms  Open vs closed reduction Ultrasound 15  Introduced in 1978 for early evaluation  Graf2s technique = Operator independent  Useful in confirming subluxation, identifying dysplasia of cartilaginous acetabulum, documenting reducibility  Prox. Femoral Ossification Center may interfere Ultrasound 16 Femoral head Abductors Ilium Ultrasound 17 Graf’s alpha angle >60 = normal *line w/ ilium bisects head 50/50 18 Radiographs Summary 19  Femoral head appears 4 - 7 months  Shenton’s line  Perkin’s and Hilgenreiner’s lines Inferomedial quadrant  Acetabular index Normal < 30 (Weintroub et al) Treatment Options 20  Age of patient at presentation  Family factors  Reducibility of hip  Stability after reduction  Amount of acetabular dysplasia 21 Birth to Six Months 22  Pavlik harness (1944) Experienced staff* Very successful (20-80%) Allows free movement within confines of restraints *posterior straps for preventing add. NOT producing abd. Birth to Six Months 23  Pavlik harness  Indications  Fully reducible hip*  Child not attempting to stand  Family  Close regular follow-up (every 1-2 weeks)  For imaging and adjustments  Duration  Childs age at hip stability + 3 months Pavlik Harness 24  Complications  Avascular necrosis  Forced hip abduction  Safe zone (abd/adduction and flexion/extension)  Femoral nerve palsy  Hyperflexion > 6 months 25  Closed reduction + Spica  Failure after 3 weeks of Pavlik trial > 6 months 26  Closed reduction  General anesthesia  Arthrogram  Safe zone - avoid AVN  +/- adductor tenotomy  Open reduction if concentric reduction not possible  Usually teratogenic hips in this age group > 6 months 27 Closed reduction +/- adductor tenotomy Spica in human position of 100 degrees of flexion and about 55 degrees abduction (3 months) Abduction Orthosis 4 wks full time/4 wks nighttime Open reduction (if closed fails) Femoral Shortening 28 Pelvic Osteotomy 29 Summary 30  Best if treated before 6 weeks of age  0 - 6 months of age  Pavlik  6 - 18 months  Closed vs open reduction and spica  18 - 48 months  Closed  Open +/- osteotomies Thanks…

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser