2024 Exam 2 Review PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by IndividualizedFreesia
2024
Tags
Summary
This document is a review for Exam 2 in social psychology, scheduled for December 5th, 2024. It covers key topics such as social comparison, social facilitation, and social norms. The document outlines the exam's breakdown and lists various questions that will likely be on the exam.
Full Transcript
EXAM 2 REVIEW EXAM: Thu DEC 5, 2024 IN CLASS! LOOKING FORWARD Th Dec 5: Exam 2 Presentation work log due Mon Dec 9, 11:59pm Presentations start Th Dec 12 Presentations continue T Dec 17, 12:40-2:30 Presentation Summary Due Fri Dec 20 REMEMBER, YOU HAVE THE TOOLS TO OVERCOME THIS CHALLENGE. E...
EXAM 2 REVIEW EXAM: Thu DEC 5, 2024 IN CLASS! LOOKING FORWARD Th Dec 5: Exam 2 Presentation work log due Mon Dec 9, 11:59pm Presentations start Th Dec 12 Presentations continue T Dec 17, 12:40-2:30 Presentation Summary Due Fri Dec 20 REMEMBER, YOU HAVE THE TOOLS TO OVERCOME THIS CHALLENGE. EXAM 2 BREAKDOWN (15% OF GRADE) Approximately 42-46 Multiple Choice Questions, FITB, Matching questions (weighted at 1pt each) 4-6 short answer, integration style questions (think prompts, but more straight forward) SOCIAL COMPARISON: 4-5 QUESTIONS ◼ Festinger, 1954 – KNOW HIS DAMN NAME (lateral comparisons) ◼ Motivation = self-evaluation, reduce uncertainty ◼ Comparison source = similar others ◼ Downward ◼ Motive = self-enhancement ◼ See it in people with low self-esteem ◼ Upward ◼ Motive = self-improvement ◼ BUT, if it is chronic or the comparison source is too high? ◼ Contrast/assimilation effects ◼ Upward: can you improve? Assimilation. You can’t improve? Contrast. Depress self-esteem ◼ Evaluahancement ◼ Subjective/objective tasks (Crano & Gorenflo) SOCIAL FACILITATION/INHIBITION: 5- 6 QUESTIONS ◼ Social inhibition ◼ Where do we see it? (e.g,. bystander effect, emotional expression, social loafing) ◼ Why? Arousal; uncertainty/ambiguity (normative cues), pluralistic ignorance, diffusion of responsibility, evaluation apprehension ◼ Social facilitation ◼ Mere presence (Drive Theory), evaluation apprehension (think of specific others!), threat SOCIAL NORMS, COMPLIANCE TECHNIQUES: 5-6 QUESTIONS ◼ Descriptive social norms ◼ Injunctive social norms ◼ Examples of manipulating the social environment ◼ Social norms marketing campaigns – how can you use both types of norms? ◼ Compliance techniques (know norms for each) ◼ Door-in-the-face, foot-in-the-door, that’s not all, low ball POWER & OBEDIENCE: 6-7 QUESTIONS ◼ Define power vs. influence ◼ Know Raven’s bases of power (be able to apply them) See Canvas -> Modules->Power & Obedience (two word docs will help you practice and you don’t need to memorize the Raven paper) ◼ Obedience ◼ Why were Milgram’s findings so “shocking”? ◼ Explanations: cultural norm (obey authority), shift in agency, consistency ◼ Some of the other findings (e.g., setting, dissent, personality) ◼ Alternative explanations ◼ Not mere obedience but ENGAGED FOLLOWERSHIP CONFORMITY-POLARIZATION: 5-6 QUESTIONS ◼ Normative influence – when? – thinking/focus? ◼ (originally, proposed explanation for Asch) ◼ Surveillance, social pressure outweighs individual expectations and “personality” ◼ Informational influence – when? – thinking/focus ◼ (originally, proposed explanation for Sherif) ◼ Uncertainty about source, about self ◼ In Asch paradigms, importance of dissent (drop conformity) ◼ Group polarization REFERENT INFORMATIONAL INFLUENCE: 5-6 QUESTIONS ◼ Motive: Information for self-concept through group identification ◼ Prototype as basis of influence ◼ Define ◼ Meta-contrast (what is the role of comparison to ingroup? To outgroup?) ◼ Depersonalization ◼ Self-uncertainty – what groups are attractive? ◼ Group polarization in an intergroup context CROWDS: 6-7 QUESTIONS ◼ Deindividuation – define ◼ Anonymity, irrationality ◼ Normative information? ◼ SIDE: not a loss of personal identity, but a gain of a social identity ◼ Salient social identity is reference for influence (crowd, what are norms?) ◼ Often intergroup context ◼ Riots and social movements: ◼ Riots in established vs. transient communities ◼ As a response to oppression ENFORCEMENT: 5-7 QUESTIONS ◼ Ostracism – effects on the target ◼ Reflexive stage: It hurts – affective and pain response ◼ Even from despised groups ◼ Reflective stage (attempt to recover) ◼ Self-affirmation, distraction, conform to group, open to influence, better memory for social information, increase work on collective tasks ◼ Inclusionary need: need to belong, prosocial response (gain entry) ◼ Power/need for meaningful existence: aggressive response (gain attention, control) ENFORCEMENT: 5-7 QUESTIONS ◼ Enforcement ◼ Why derogate norm violators? ◼ Protect group identity - black sheep effect (why?) ◼ Correct deviant, persuade deviant (why?) ◼ Who can dissent? ◼ Most likely to dissent ingroup norms – people who identify strongly with the group and do it on behalf of group ◼ Leaders (leader transgression credit) ◼ Intergroup sensitivity MINORITY INFLUENCE: 5-7 QUESTIONS ◼ Conversion theory – KNOW MOSCOVICI’S NAME ◼ All influence attempts create either/or situation – conflict ◼ Majorities: social comparison. Resolve by going along with majority. Only conversion if LIKED majority ◼ Minorities: verification. Resolve privately. Can lead to conversion through scrutinizing message ◼ Behavioral style: consistency, fair & flexible, distinctiveness ◼ Divergent thinking, Convergent thinking ◼ creativity MINORITY INFLUENCE: 5-7 QUESTIONS ◼ Dual process models using cognitive response as a mediator ◼ Majorities – interpersonal focus, compliance ◼ Minorities – message focus, conversion ◼ But when and how? ◼ Latent attitudes, delayed attitudes, indirect attitudes (that interattitudinal network!) ◼ Ingroup leniency ◼ Social context (referent informational influence) ◼ When can you see direct attitude change from minority? ◼ Outgroup influence – a SCT perspective SOCIAL CHANGE: 5-6 QUESTIONS ◼ Achieve a positive identity in response to subordination ◼ Nature of intergroup relations ◼ Permeability/Stability , Legitimacy 1. Social mobility (individual mobility) – permeable boundaries, often legitimate 2. Social creativity – often impermeable boundaries 3. Social change – impermeable boundaries, illegitimate ◼ Politicized identity and collective action ◼ Define ◼ When? Become aware of subordination ◼ Recognize GBD/subordination, motivation is defined by cost-benefit and efficacy of achieving outcome, barriers such as cost) LEADERSHIP: 5-7 QUESTIONS ◼ Leadership: what it is, what it is not ◼ Leadership schemas – why is it difficult for nontraditional leaders to occupy leadership positions? ◼ Gender and leadership – gender stereotypes, gender stereotype violation ◼ Intersectionality ◼ Great leader theory – why it doesn’t hold ◼ Charisma ◼ Social identity perspectives on leadership ◼ Group and leader – reciprocal ◼ Role of prototypicality: WHY SO INFLUENTIAL? LEADERSHIP: 5-7 QUESTIONS ◼ Are prototypical leaders worth it? ◼ They get our trust, we think they are effective, we support them… more, likeability ◼ Yes, they identify strongly with the group and tend to work on behalf of it ◼ BUT ◼ Trust them even when they fail ◼ Leader transgression credit ◼ Deviance becomes the norm, entrepreneurs of identity and shape the group prototype ◼ Engaged followership, plausible deniability