Midterm 2 - Google Docs PDF

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

Summary

This document appears to be a midterm for a psychology course focusing on cognitive development. It contains questions and answers on concepts such as the spacing effect, recognition vs recall, and the nature-nurture debate.

Full Transcript

‭Cognitive Development I, 10/1/24‬ ‭1.‬ ‭What is the spacing effect in memory?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Spacing Effect:‬‭the cognitive benefit of distributing‬‭study sessions over time‬ ‭rather than in a single period (cramming)‬ ‭b.‬ ‭S...

‭Cognitive Development I, 10/1/24‬ ‭1.‬ ‭What is the spacing effect in memory?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Spacing Effect:‬‭the cognitive benefit of distributing‬‭study sessions over time‬ ‭rather than in a single period (cramming)‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Spacing allows for better memory consolidation; reduces cognitive load; better‬ ‭long-term retention‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Ex. Studying vocab for 20 min each day rather than two hours before the test‬ ‭2.‬ ‭When it comes to people with extraordinary abilities, there are intriguing questions‬ ‭about how much can be attributed to genetic predispositions vs. motivation and‬ ‭deliberate practice. In the case of intelligence, the threshold hypothesis suggests that‬ ‭there is a correlation between IQ and success, but only up to a point - that having‬ ‭additional IQ points beyond this threshold doesn't contribute much to success. Does‬ ‭the evidence support this idea?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Hypothesis suggests there is a‬‭positive‬‭correlation‬‭between IG and success but‬ ‭says that the correlation plateaus beyond a certain point‬ ‭i.‬ ‭At some point, more IQ adds little real-world success‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Ex. Successful professionals or creatives may not have the highest IQ scores but‬ ‭succeed due to resilience and motivation‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Supports the hypothesis that beyond a certain point, IQ is not the sole‬ ‭predictor‬ ‭3.‬ ‭In studying, is it better to focus on recognition, or on recall? Describe the Karpicke‬ ‭& Roediger experiment about finding the most efficient study strategies.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Recognition:‬‭Identifying previously encountered information‬‭when it is presented‬ ‭again‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Ex. Multiple choice questions on a test. You recognize the correct answer‬ ‭from a‬‭set of choices‬‭rather than generating it from‬‭memory‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Recall:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The ability to retrieve information from memory without explicit cues or‬ ‭prompts‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Ex. Answering short-answer questions about a specific theory from‬ ‭memory.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Karpicke & Roediger Experiment:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Designed to compare study methods and measure the effectiveness of‬ ‭recall-based study (retrieval) versus recognition or review-based study‬ ‭1.‬ ‭They found that students who practiced retrieval/recall, retained‬ ‭information significantly better than those who relied on‬ ‭recognition‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Recall is‬‭more effective‬‭as a study strategy for long-term‬‭retention‬ ‭as compared to recognition-based methods.‬ ‭4.‬ W ‭ hat is the Nature-Nurture question? Describe how this question applies to (1)‬ ‭individual differences among humans, (2) differentiating humans from other‬ ‭animals, and (3) human development. Considering "nature" and "nurture", how do‬ ‭these line up with "nativism" and "empiricism"?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭The question asks to what extent our characteristics, behaviors, and abilities are‬ ‭shaped by genetics (natural) versus our environmental influences (nurture).‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Differences among humans:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Nature:‬‭Genetic predispositions can influence traits‬‭like‬ ‭intelligence, personality, and physical characteristics‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Ex. Generic differences explain why some people are‬ ‭naturally more extroverted than others.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Nurture:‬‭Uprinting, education, culture, and personal‬‭experience‬ ‭shape and modify these traits‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Ex. a person may inherit a tendency towards high‬ ‭intelligence, but their schooling and opportunities affect‬ ‭how that intelligence develops.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Ex.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭A study of twins shows that identical twins raised apart‬ ‭often have similar traits, but can show significant‬ ‭differences due to each respective environment.‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Humans VS Animals:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Nature:‬‭Humans share basic biological processes with‬‭animals due‬ ‭to common ancestry, but genetic evolution has left humans with‬ ‭unique traits, like advanced cognitive abilities, language, and‬ ‭culture.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Nurture:‬‭HUman development is highly influenced by‬‭cultural‬ ‭and social learning, which sets us apart from most animals.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Ex.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Primates and some animals show forms of communication‬ ‭and tool use, human language and complex technology rely‬ ‭on environmental learning and cultural transmission,‬ ‭highlighting a combination of biological potential and‬ ‭nurture-based development‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Human Development:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Nature:‬ ‭Certain developmental milestones (walking,‬‭talking, and‬ ‭emotional responses) have biological basis and tend to unfold‬ ‭across all cultures‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Nurture:‬‭Environment shapes how individuals reach‬‭and move‬ ‭through these stages‬ ‭a.‬ E ‭ x. a child's language abilities depend on genetic‬ ‭predispositions but require extensive exposure to language‬ ‭in order to develop.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Ex.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭While all children are biologically predisposed to acquire‬ ‭language, the specific languages they speak are determined‬ ‭by their environment.‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Nativism & Empiricism:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Nativism (‬‭Aligned with nature): The idea that certain‬‭abilities or‬ ‭characteristics are innate and biologically determined‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Ex. Humans are born with inherent cognitive abilities like‬ ‭the potential for language‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Empiricism (‬‭aligned with nurture): The belief that‬‭knowledge‬ ‭comes from experience and that the mind starts as a blank slate‬ ‭(tabula rasa).‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Interaction:‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Modern psychology views nature and nurture as‬ ‭interconnected; both genetics and environment play a role‬ ‭in development‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Interactionism:‬‭Trains emerge from the dynamic‬ ‭interaction of genetics and environment.‬ ‭5.‬ ‭When are most of the neurons in your brain made?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Prenatal development:‬‭When most of the neurons in‬‭the human brain are created‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Ex. between the third and sixth months of gestation‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Neurogenesis:‬‭The process of rapid formation of neurons;‬‭establishes the‬ ‭foundational structure of the brain‬ ‭c.‬ ‭***The hippocampus continues to develop more neurons, which is involved in‬ ‭memory and learning***‬ 6‭.‬ ‭Describe the difference between assimilation and accommodation.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Used by Jean Piaget to help explain how people incorporate new information‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Assimilation:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The processes of integrating new information into existing cognitive‬ ‭schemas, without changing the schema itself‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Ex. A young child sees a zebra for the first time and calls it a ‘horse’‬ ‭because it fits their existing schema for four-legged animals‬ ‭1.‬ ‭The child incorporates the zebra into their current understanding of‬ ‭animals that look like horses.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Accommodation:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The processes of modifying existing schemas or creating new ones to‬ ‭incorporate new information that doesn't fit with what is already known‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭ x. After learning that a zebra is not a horse, but a distinct animal, the‬ E ‭child adjusts their schema, creating a new category for zebras‬‭separate‬ ‭from horses.‬ ‭7.‬ ‭What are the two ways that the brain matures, according to the textbook? Describe‬ ‭how each works.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Synaptogenesis:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The formation of new synapses (connections between neurons) in the‬ ‭brain, especially abundant during early development‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭During infancy and early childhood, neurons create a cast number of‬ ‭connections in response to sensory and learning experiences. This high‬ ‭amount of synaptic connections leads to greater flexibility in learning and‬ ‭adapting to the environment.‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Synaptogenesis allows the brain to respond to new information and‬ ‭experiences, laying the foundation for learning and adapting in early life‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭As a child interacts with the world, the brain's neural network expands,‬ ‭supporting cognitive, motor, and emotional development.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Myelination:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The processes where axons (the long projections of neurons that carry‬ ‭signals) are coated with myelin, a fatty insulating substance.‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Myelin acts like insulation on a wire, speeding up the transmission of‬ ‭electrical signals between neurons‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭The process begins in infancy but continues through adolescent and even‬ ‭into early adulthood‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Myelination enhances processing speed, making communication between‬ ‭neurons more efficient.‬ ‭v.‬ ‭Crucial for complex functions like problem solving, impulse control, and‬ ‭decision making, which become more refined as the brian matures.‬ 8‭.‬ ‭How does synaptic pruning relate to previous concepts of learning discussed in class‬ ‭(think: juggling)?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭When learning a new skill (juggling), the brain initially forms many new‬ ‭connections to manage the required coordination, timing, and hand-eye‬ ‭movements‬ ‭b.‬ ‭With continued practicum certain neural pathways are used more frequently and‬ ‭becomes stronger‬ ‭c.‬ ‭These pathways are repeatedly activated, reinforcing the specific sequences and‬ ‭patterns needed for juggling‬ ‭d.‬ ‭The brain's neural networks are reorganized to focus on the most effective‬ ‭pathways, leading to improved skill and consistency‬ ‭e.‬ ‭As the skin becomes more refined, synaptic pruning rescues less used or‬ ‭unnecessary connections, which may have been helpful when learning‬ ‭f.‬ B ‭ y pruning these unused connections, the brian naturally optimizes the structure‬ ‭for efficiency‬ ‭g.‬ ‭This optimization makes juggling feel more natural and requires less conscious‬ ‭effort, demonstrating how pruning contributes to the mastery of a learned skill‬ ‭9.‬ ‭What is constructivism, in Piagetian theory?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Constructivism:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The idea that children actively construct their understanding of the world‬ ‭through experiences and interactions‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Children learn by engaging with their environment, manipulating objects,‬ ‭and observing outcomes.‬ ‭1.‬ ‭They form mental models that they constantly test and adjust based‬ ‭on new experiences‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Children are naturally curious and motivated to understand the world,‬ ‭driving them to explore and learn actively‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭A child learns about gravity by repeatedly dropping objects and observing‬ ‭that they fall. Through this active engagement, the child constructs an‬ ‭understanding of gravity.‬ ‭v.‬ ‭When children encounter something unfamiliar, like an animal they have‬ ‭never seen before, they may initially fit into an existing scheme ex.‬ ‭Calling a zebra a striped horse)‬ ‭1.‬ ‭As they learn, they refine their schemas, and construct a more‬ ‭accurate understanding of different animals‬ ‭10.‬‭What motivates children to learn, according to Piaget?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Children are intrinsically motivated to learn due to their natural curiosity and‬ ‭desire to understand and make sense of the world‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Intrinsic Curiosity:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Piaget viewed children as naturally curious "little scientists" who‬ ‭want to explore and discover how things work. This curiosity‬ ‭drives them to ask questions, experiment, and actively engage with‬ ‭their surroundings, leading to learning.‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Desire for Cognitive Equilibrium:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Where children strive to balance what they know and the new‬ ‭information they encounter‬ ‭2.‬ ‭When a child encounters something surprising, it creates‬ ‭disequilibrium, prompting them to resolve this by adapting their‬ ‭schemes through assimilation (integrating new information) or‬ ‭accommodation (adjusting schemas).‬ ‭Lecture 12, Oct 8‬ ‭1.‬ W ‭ hy is testability important in distinguishing scientific knowledge from other forms‬ ‭of belief, such as religious beliefs or superstitions?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Testability means that a claim can be empirically testing:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭It can be observed, measured, and subjected to experiments‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Scientific knowledge relies on the ability to collect data through controlled‬ ‭observation or experiments which can either support or refute a hypothesis‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Ex. A certain medication reduces symptoms of a disease‬ ‭1.‬ ‭This can be tested through a clinical trials where outcomes and‬ ‭variables are measured to prove or disprove a claim‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Falsifiable:‬‭A hypothesis can be structured in a way‬‭that it can be proven false if‬ ‭contrary evidence is found‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Ex. “All swans are white”‬ ‭1.‬ ‭It is falsifiable because it can be tested‬ ‭2.‬ ‭A black swan would disprove this claim‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Religious beliefs and superstitions are not testable or falsifiable‬ ‭e.‬ ‭Testability allows for reproducibility‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The ability for different researches to conduct the same test or experiment‬ ‭and obtain similar results‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Ex. If a scientist tests the boiling point of water under standard conditions‬ ‭and finds it to be 100 C, other scientists should be able to reproduce the‬ ‭same result‬ ‭2.‬ ‭How does the role of skepticism in science help ensure the reliability of knowledge?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Skepticism drives scientists to critically examine the methods, data and‬ ‭conclusions of research‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Critical scrutiny helps us to identify flaws, biases, or errors in research‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Ex. If a new study claims a drug is a effective, a skeptical scientist would‬ ‭examine the studies design like the sample size, control conditions, and‬ ‭potential conflicts of interest, before accepting the results‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Ultimately, skepticism acts as a filter that removes unreliable or poorly supported‬ ‭claims, ensuring that only well-tested and verified knowledge is accepted‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Promoted through evaluation‬ ‭3.‬ ‭How does Descartes' idea of vivid dreams that are indistinguishable from reality‬ ‭challenge our connection to the external world? What does this imply about the‬ ‭nature of perception?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Descartes vivid dream hypothesis suggests that if dreams can feel as real as‬ ‭waking experiences, when our senses might not be reliable indicators of external‬ ‭reality‬ ‭b.‬ ‭If there is no clear distinction between dreaming and reality, than our senses are‬ ‭merely a product of the mind‬ ‭c.‬ T ‭ his leads to the possibility that all of our sensory experiences could be illusions‬ ‭or constructs and we may never be certain of the existence of an external world‬ ‭based solely on our senses‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Descartes thought experiment challenges this assumption that our perceptions‬ ‭directly correspond to a reality‬ ‭e.‬ ‭Ultimately, descartes theory raises questions about the nature of reality and the‬ ‭limits of human perception‬ ‭4.‬ ‭How can scientific knowledge be provisional, and why is this an important aspect of‬ ‭the scientific process?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Scientific knowledge is considered provisional because it is always open to‬ ‭revision or change based off of new evidence of improved methods of research‬ ‭b.‬ ‭So, scientific conclusions are not seen as absolute truths but the best‬ ‭understanding we have at a given time, based on all available data, knowledge,‬ ‭and evidence.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Knowing that nothing is for certain allows us to consider new evidence and‬ ‭constantly have new discoveries leading us to be more knowledge over time‬ 5‭.‬ ‭What role should our university play in the development of knowledge, according to‬ ‭Benjamin Franklin’s vision? How does this relate to the modern purpose of higher‬ ‭education?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Franklin proposed that Penn should educate young people not on just classical‬ ‭knowledge but also subjects directly related to everyday life like commerce,‬ ‭agriculture, navigation, and language‬ ‭b.‬ ‭In other words, he believed in a holistic education‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Franklin believed that education should instill a sense of civic duty and prepare‬ ‭students to contribute positively to the public good‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Penns emphasis on interdisciplinary research, community service, and diverse‬ ‭educational opportunities reflects the foundational goals of UPenn, which honors‬ ‭Franklin's legacy‬ ‭6.‬ ‭What is the key difference between how knowledge is established in mathematics‬ ‭versus science?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Mathematics:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Axiomatic Systems:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Math is based on axioms‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Fundamental assumptions of self evident truths that are accepted‬ ‭without proof‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Deductive Reasoning:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭The process of establishing knowledge in mathematics through‬ ‭deductive reasoning‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Mathematics prove statements by showing that they logically‬ ‭follow from previously established truths or axioms‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Proofs:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Step by step demonstration that a mathematical statement is true‬ ‭based on logical arguments‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Scientific Knowledge:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Empirical Knowledge:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Relies on empirical evidence, knowledge through observations,‬ ‭experiments, and data collection‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Inductive reasoning:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭General principles are derived from specific observations‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Falsifiability and Testing:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Needs to be testable and falsifiable‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Should be able to conduct experiences that could potentially prove‬ ‭a hypothesis or theory wrong‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Provisional Nature:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Scientific theories are always‬‭provisional‬‭meaning‬‭that they can‬ ‭be modified or discarded if new evidence contradicts them‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Summary:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Math:‬‭Relies on logical proofs and deductive reasoning‬‭within an‬ ‭axiomatic system‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Science:‬‭Depends on empirical evidence, inductive‬‭reasoning,and the‬ ‭ability to be rested and falsified through observation and experimentation‬ ‭7.‬ ‭What can make testing hypotheses challenging, and how do scientists resolve them?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Many scientific studies, especially in fields like psychology, biology, or other‬ ‭social sciences, multiple variables can influence an outcome‬ ‭b.‬ ‭A resolution to this problem is to have controlled experiments where you isolate‬ ‭the independent variable and control the others.‬ ‭Cognitive Development II - October 10‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Name the four Piagetian stages of cognitive development, the ages associated, and‬ ‭the kind of thinking associated with each.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Sensorimotor Stage:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Occurs from birth to 2 years old‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Infants learn about the world through sensory experiences and motor‬ ‭actions (touching, feeling, seeing)‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Development of object permanence occurs‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Preoperational Stage:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭From 2-7 years old‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Children begin to use symbols like words and images to represent objects,‬ ‭supporting pretend play and imaginative thought‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭ hey are egocentric (focused on themselves and can't recognize others‬ T ‭perspectives)‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Thoughts are intuitive rather than logical‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Concrete Operational Stage:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭From 7-12 years old‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Children develop the ability to think logically about concrete objects and‬ ‭events‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Understand conservation, reversibility, and cause and effect‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Mental operations like math are possible, but thinking is still tied to‬ ‭concrete objects rather than ideas‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Formal Operational Stage:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Begins around 12 years old to adulthood‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Abstract reasoning, hypothetical thinking, and deductive reasoning‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭thinking about abstract concepts‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Describe the A-and-not-B error, and what it explains about Piaget’s sensorimotor‬ ‭stage.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Shows how infants develop object permanence‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The understanding the objects continue to exist even when they are out of‬ ‭sight‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭This error occurs between 8 and 12 months of age‬ ‭b.‬ ‭In the experiment, an infant watches an object (like a toy) which is hidden under a‬ ‭cover‬ ‭c.‬ ‭After repeatedly finding the object in location A, the object is then hidden at a‬ ‭new location, B‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Despite seeing the object placed at location B, the infants often reach for location‬ ‭A‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Shows that infants are developing an understanding of object permanence,‬ ‭but have not fully mastered it‬ 3‭.‬ ‭From the textbook: Describe the theory of mind. Why is the theory of mind‬ ‭important for development? Consider the following experiment:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Refers to the ability to understand that others have beliefs, desires, and‬ ‭intentions, and perspectives that are different than one's own‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Allows individuals to predict and interpret the behaviors of others based of‬ ‭an understanding of their mental state‬ ‭b.‬ ‭A researcher asks a child to observe two puppets: Sally and Anne. The first‬ ‭puppet, Sally, places a pencil in a basket and then leaves the room. When‬ ‭Sally is gone, the second puppet, Anne, moves Sally’s pencil from the basket‬ ‭to a box. The researcher then asks the child, "Where will Sally look for her‬ ‭pencil when she comes back?"‬ ‭i.‬ ‭ he typical three-year-old would answer in the box because they assume‬ T ‭Sally knows what they know‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭This age group struggles to understand that Sally has a different‬ ‭perspective and would not know if the pencil had moved‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭By age five, most children have developed a stronger theory of mind, and‬ ‭understand that others can hold beliefs different from their own‬ ‭1.‬ ‭So, the five-year-old would say “In the basket”‬ ‭4.‬ ‭From the textbook: Name the three main stages of Kohlberg’s theory of moral‬ ‭development and the type of thinking associated with each. (According to Kohlberg.‬ ‭As the text points out, this is a classic theory but not one widely held today.)‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Preconventional Stage:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Morality is viewed in terms of consequences and self-interest‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Right and wrong are determined by the direct consequences of actions‬ ‭(punishment or reward)‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Actions are judged based on the likelihood of punishment, with‬ ‭individuals acting to avoid negative outcomes‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Ex. A child in this stage may think:‬ ‭1.‬ ‭“If I don't steal, I won't get punished”‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Focusing on avoiding punishment, rather than an ethical principle‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Conventional Stage:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Morality is based on social rules and the desire to maintain social order‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Right and wrong are determined by societal expectations and norms‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Actions are considered moral if they align with societal expectations or‬ ‭please others‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Ex.‬ ‭1.‬ ‭“I shouldn't steal because it's against the law, and laws keep society‬ ‭in order”‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Emphasizes duty and social rules‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Postconventional Stage:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Morality is baked on abstract principles and personal ethical standards‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Right and wrong are determined by reasoning that goes beyond society's‬ ‭laws or rules‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Laes are seen as flexible tools to support human rights and welfare‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Ex.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭“Stealing to save a life might be justified because preserving life is‬ ‭a higher ethical principle than following the law”‬ ‭3.‬ ‭A focus on universal moral principles over specific rules‬ ‭Stage‬ ‭Type of Thinking‬ ‭Example Reasoning‬ ‭Preconventional‬ ‭ elf-interest and‬ S I‭ won't steal to avoid‬ ‭consequence-based reasoning‬ ‭punishment‬ ‭Conventional‬ ‭ ocial approval and‬ S I‭ won't steal because it is‬ ‭rule-based reasoning‬ ‭against the law‬ ‭Postconventional‬ ‭ bstract principles and‬ A ‭ tealing may be justified to‬ S ‭personal ethics‬ ‭save a life‬ ‭5.‬ D ‭ escribe two examples that illustrate children's failures to conserve liquid and‬ ‭number (think about the video we watched in the lecture of the child being asked‬ ‭about conservation tasks). How did Piaget explain these failures of conservation?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Failure to Conserve Liquid:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭A child is shown two identical glasses filled with the same amount of‬ ‭water‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭The child agrees that both glasses contain an equal amount‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Then the experiment pours the water from one glass into a taller, narrower,‬ ‭glass, making the water level seem higher in the new glass‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭The child says that the taller glass has more water, focusing on the height‬ ‭of the liquid rather than understanding that the volume remains unchanged‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Failure to Conserve NUmber:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭A child is shown two rows of the same number of coins placed evenly in a‬ ‭line‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭The chill agrees that both rows have the same number of coins‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭The experimenter spreads out the coins in one of the words, making it‬ ‭longer than the other row, and asks the child which row has more coins‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭The child responds that the longer row has more coins‬ ‭v.‬ ‭Piaget says that the child focuses in the increased length of the row‬ ‭vi.‬ ‭They struggle with the concept of invariance, meaning they don't yet‬ ‭understand the quantity remains the same despite changes in the‬ ‭arrangement‬ ‭6.‬ ‭Contrary to Piaget’s theories, modern developmental researchers have found that‬ ‭infants do have certain sophisticated intuitions about the world around them.‬ ‭Describe one study that tested Piaget’s theory of object permanence, as well as one‬ ‭study that examined infant intuitions about probability.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Baillargeon's Impossible Event Study‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Renee Baillargeon used a violation of expectation method to test whether‬ ‭infants have a basic understanding of object permanence earlier than‬ ‭Piaget proposed‬ ‭ii.‬ I‭ nfants were shown a screen that rotated back and forth then an object was‬ ‭placed behind the screen‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭In the “impossible” condition, the screen rotated fully as if the object was‬ ‭not there, seemingly passing through it. In the “possible” condition, the‬ ‭screen stopped when it reached the hidden object, consistent with reality.‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Infants as young as 4 months old looked significantly longer at the‬ ‭impossible vent than the possible one, indicating curiosity‬ ‭v.‬ ‭Suggests that they understand that the object continued to exist even when‬ ‭out of sight‬ ‭vi.‬ ‭Contrary to Piaget's claim that infants only develop object permanence‬ ‭around 8-12 months‬ ‭vii.‬ ‭Baillargeon's findings imply that infants have an understanding of object‬ ‭permanence much earlier than Piaget theorized suggesting that young‬ ‭children possess a more innate intuitive grasp of object permanence than‬ ‭Paiget said‬ ‭7.‬ ‭We were going to have a question about the textbook’s explanation of ‘dynamic‬ ‭systems theory’ but the concept is pretty slippery and the text’s description isn’t‬ ‭great. So feel free to skim over that part.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭A framework in developmental psychology that describes how complex behaviors‬ ‭emerge from the interaction of multiple factors over time‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Development is not linear or predetermined, instead, it arises from the interplay‬ ‭between an individual's biology, their environment, and their specific experiences‬ 8‭.‬ ‭Unlike adults or older children, young infants can’t use language or other signals‬ ‭(e.g., pointing) to show their preferences and cognitive ability. How do researchers‬ ‭study perception in infants?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Habituation-Dishabituation Method‬ ‭i.‬ ‭In habituation studies, researchers present an infant with the same stimulus‬ ‭repeatedly until the infant’s attention wanes (indicating habituation). Then,‬ ‭they introduce a new stimulus and observe whether the infant’s attention is‬ ‭renewed (dishabituation).‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭If infants show renewed interest in the new stimulus, it suggests they can‬ ‭distinguish between the original and new stimuli. This method is used to‬ ‭study infants’ ability to perceive differences in color, shapes, and sounds.‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Ex. An infant is shown a blue square repeatedly and then presented with a‬ ‭red square‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭An increase in attention to the red square indicates that the infant‬ ‭perceives a difference between the colors‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Preferential Looking Technique‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Infants are presented with two stimuli side by side, and researchers‬ ‭measure which stimulus the infant looks at longer‬ ‭ii.‬ I‭ nfants tend to look longer at objects they find more interesting or‬ ‭complex, indicating preference‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭In studies where infants are shown an image of a human face next to a‬ ‭scrambled version of the face, infants tend to look longer at the organized‬ ‭face, suggesting an innate preference for face-like patterns.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭VIolation-of-Expectation Method:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭This technique relies on the principle that infants will look longer at events‬ ‭that surprise them. Researchers show infants a scenario with an "expected"‬ ‭outcome and an "unexpected" outcome, then measure how long the infants‬ ‭look at each.‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Longer-looking times at the unexpected outcome indicate that infants‬ ‭have certain expectations about how the world works, which is violated by‬ ‭the surprising outcome.‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭In Renée Baillargeon’s famous object permanence studies, infants were‬ ‭shown a screen rotating as if an object behind it had disappeared. Infants‬ ‭looked longer at this "impossible" event, indicating that they understood‬ ‭the object should still exist even if it is out of sight.‬ ‭.‬ ‭Eye-Tracking:‬ d ‭i.‬ ‭In language studies, eye-tracking has shown that infants can follow mouth‬ ‭movements while listening to speech sounds, suggesting an early‬ ‭sensitivity to language and visual speech cues.‬ ‭Lecture 14, Cognitive Development (continued) and Language I - 10/15/24‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Piaget found that children younger than 7 years old fail the "3-mountain" task, in‬ ‭which they are shown a diorama of a mountain scene, from one side, and are asked‬ ‭to report what a doll (sitting on the other side) would see. Piaget interpreted this‬ ‭finding to mean that children are egocentric (they cannot put themselves in another‬ ‭person's shoes). Should we agree with Piaget's conclusion? Why or why not? In your‬ ‭justification, describe the findings of a simpler study using a card with different‬ ‭images on either side‬‭.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Task‬‭: Children under 7 view a mountain diorama and‬‭are asked to describe what a‬ ‭doll on the opposite side would see. They often fail, describing only their own‬ ‭perspective.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Piaget’s Interpretation‬‭: Piaget saw this as evidence‬‭of‬‭egocentrism‬‭, where‬ ‭young children struggle to adopt others’ viewpoints.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Alternative View‬‭: A simpler study using a double-sided‬‭card (with different‬ ‭images on each side) showed that even young children could identify what‬ ‭another person would see. This suggests Piaget may have overestimated‬ ‭egocentrism, as task complexity might affect children’s performance.‬ ‭2.‬ D ‭ escribe Steinberg’s proposal for the neurological basis of risky behavior in‬ ‭teenagers.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Proposal‬‭: Steinberg suggests that teens’ risky behavior‬‭stems from an‬‭imbalance‬ ‭in brain development‬‭—the limbic system (reward sensitivity)‬‭matures earlier‬ ‭than the prefrontal cortex (impulse control).‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Implication‬‭: This developmental gap may lead teens‬‭to prioritize rewards over‬ ‭caution, explaining higher risk-taking in adolescence.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Describe schemas, assimilation, and accommodation, with reference to children’s‬ ‭acquisition of knowledge.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Schemas‬‭: Mental frameworks that help children organize‬‭knowledge (e.g., a‬ ‭schema for “dog”).‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Assimilation‬‭: Integrating new information into existing‬‭schemas (calling all‬ ‭four-legged animals “dogs”).‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Accommodation‬‭: Modifying schemas to fit new information‬‭(learning that a‬ ‭“cat” is different from a “dog”). These processes support children’s knowledge‬ ‭acquisition.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭How are various aspects of cognitive capacities affected as we age? What is‬ ‭something that can help?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Effects: Aging affects cognitive areas like processing speed and memory recall,‬ ‭though crystallized intelligence (knowledge) often remains stable or improves.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Improvement: Engaging in mentally stimulating activities can help preserve‬ ‭cognitive function.‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Why do older people tend to be more “present-focused” than younger people?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Explanation‬‭: Older adults are more present-focused,‬‭likely due to a‬‭greater‬ ‭awareness of limited time‬‭. This motivates them to‬‭prioritize current emotional‬ ‭satisfaction and meaningful experiences over future planning.‬ ‭6.‬ ‭Describe some experimental findings that might help explain why ‘peak’ happiness‬ ‭is found between about 65 and 75 years of age. (Think: Mather et al. and Notthoff &‬ ‭Carstensen.)‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Findings‬‭: Research by Mather et al. and Notthoff &‬‭Carstensen suggests that‬ ‭older adults experience higher happiness, possibly due to improved emotional‬ ‭regulation, focus on positive experiences, and reduced stress over material‬ ‭achievements.‬ ‭7.‬ ‭From the textbook, Describe the theory of linguistic relativism, and describe‬ ‭Whorf’s “strong” version and the weaker version.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Definition‬‭: Linguistic relativism posits that language‬‭influences thought.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Strong Version (Whorf)‬‭: Language determines thought,‬‭limiting cognitive ability‬ ‭to linguistic constructs.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Weaker Version‬‭: Language shapes habitual thought patterns‬‭but does not restrict‬ ‭all cognitive possibilities.‬ ‭8.‬ ‭From the textbook, define morphemes, phonemes, and syntax.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Morphemes‬‭: The smallest units of meaning (e.g., “un-”‬‭in “undo”).‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Phonemes‬‭: The smallest sound units that distinguish‬‭words (e.g., “b” vs. “p” in‬ ‭“bat” and “pat”).‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Syntax‬‭: The rules for arranging words into sentences, enabling structured‬ ‭communication.‬ ‭Lecture 15, Martin Seligman: Positive Psychology and Beyond, 10/17‬ ‭1.‬ ‭What is positive psychology?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Definition‬‭: Positive psychology is a branch of psychology‬‭focused on studying‬ ‭and promoting factors that contribute to human flourishing and well-being, rather‬ ‭than just addressing mental illness.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Example‬‭: Research on gratitude practices to increase happiness and life‬ ‭satisfaction.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Define the PERMA model of well-being, and list some of its causal outcomes. (Can‬ ‭you think of all five parts?)‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Definition‬‭: The‬‭PERMA model‬‭(Seligman) identifies five components that‬ ‭contribute to well-being:‬ ‭b.‬ ‭P‬‭ositive Emotion: Experiencing joy, gratitude, and other positive emotions.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭E‬‭ngagement: Being fully absorbed in activities (flow).‬ ‭d.‬ ‭R‬‭elationships: Having meaningful connections with others.‬ ‭e.‬ ‭M‭e‬ aning: Finding purpose or significance in life.‬ ‭f.‬ ‭A‬‭ccomplishment: Achieving goals and a sense of success.‬ ‭g.‬ ‭Causal Outcomes‬‭: Increased life satisfaction, better health, and resilience.‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Example‬‭: Someone practicing PERMA by setting personal goals‬ ‭(Accomplishment) and building supportive relationships (Relationships).‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Describe active-constructive responding, and contrast it with the three other ways to‬ ‭respond to someone else’s good news.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Definition‬‭: Active-constructive responding is a way of engaging enthusiastically‬ ‭with someone else’s good news, showing interest and positivity.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Other Responses‬‭:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Passive-Constructive‬‭: Polite but subdued (e.g., “That’s nice”).‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Active-Destructive‬‭: Undermines the news (e.g., “That sounds stressful!”).‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Passive-Destructive‬‭: Ignoring or changing the topic.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Example‬‭: Actively responding to a friend’s promotion with “That’s amazing! Tell‬ ‭me all about it!” instead of a brief “Good for you.”‬ ‭4.‬ ‭What are some domains in which positive psychology has been applied? Discuss an‬ ‭application of positive psychology, as presented in lecture.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Domains‬‭: Applied in education, healthcare, workplaces, and therapy.‬ ‭b.‬ E ‭ xample‬‭: In schools, positive psychology interventions like teaching growth‬ ‭mindset can improve students’ resilience and motivation.‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Blyler & Seligman (2023) tested whether an AI system could take a back-and-forth‬ ‭chat with users into a useful personal narrative specific to the user. Did this work?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Finding‬‭: Yes, the study‬‭found that an AI system could effectively create personal‬ ‭narratives through back-and-forth interactions, helping users gain self-insight and‬ ‭clarity about their life experiences.‬ 6‭.‬ ‭From the textbook, describe cognitive appraisal, and the two main types of coping‬ ‭strategies. 7. From the textbook, what is the broaden-and-build theory (Tugade &‬ ‭Fredrickson, 2004)?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Definition‬‭:‬‭Cognitive appraisal‬‭is the process of interpreting and assessing a‬ ‭stressful situation.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Two Coping Strategies‬‭:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Problem-focused coping‬‭: Tackling the problem directly (e.g., creating a‬ ‭plan to solve an issue).‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Emotion-focused coping‬‭: Managing emotional responses (e.g., seeking‬ ‭social support).‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Example‬‭: When faced with a work deadline, using problem-focused‬ ‭coping by organizing a task list, or using emotion-focused coping by‬ ‭talking to a friend to relieve stress.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Definition‬‭: This theory proposes that positive emotions‬‭broaden one’s awareness‬ ‭and encourage novel, varied thoughts and actions, which over time build lasting‬ ‭personal resources.‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Example‬‭: Joy might encourage exploration and social‬‭connection, leading to‬ ‭strong social networks and emotional resilience.‬ ‭7.‬ ‭From the textbook, define “general adaptation syndrome” (Selye, 1936).‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Definition‬‭: A model of the body’s response to stress,‬‭consisting of three stages:‬ ‭Alarm‬‭(initial reaction),‬‭Resistance‬‭(adaptation to‬‭ongoing stress), and‬ ‭Exhaustion‬‭(depletion of resources).‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Example‬‭: Prolonged work stress leading to initial‬‭alertness, followed by coping‬ ‭efforts, and eventually burnout if stress is not managed.‬ ‭Lecture 16, Language II, 10/22/24‬ ‭1.‬ ‭What is the difference between vowels and consonants in terms of airflow? What are‬ ‭the two dimensions we consider when talking about consonant sounds? What are‬ ‭the dimensions we consider when talking about different vowel sounds?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Vowels‬‭: Produced with‬‭unrestricted airflow‬‭through‬‭the vocal tract.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Consonants‬‭: Produced with‬‭constricted airflow‬‭at specific points in the vocal‬ ‭tract.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Example‬‭: The vowel sound in "ah" flows freely, while the "t" in "top" has a‬ t‭emporary stop in airflow.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭What is coarticulation? Why does it occur? How do listeners make up for the effects‬ ‭of coarticulation on pronunciation?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Two Dimensions:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Place of Articulation: Where the airflow restriction occurs (e.g., lips for‬ ‭"p," tongue for "t").‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Manner of Articulation: How airflow is constricted (e.g., stop, fricative).‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Example: “B” is a bilabial stop, while “f” is a labiodental fricative.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Explain how the arbitrariness of sounds to word meanings is useful. 4. How does‬ ‭syntax work?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Dimensions:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Height: How high or low the tongue is (e.g., high in “beat” vs. low in‬ ‭“bat”).‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Backness: How far back in the mouth the tongue is (e.g., back in “boot”‬ ‭vs. front in “bit”).‬ ‭4.‬ ‭What is the phrase structure of syntax and how does it allow us to convey ideas that‬ ‭have never been expressed before?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Definition: Coarticulation is when sounds overlap during speech, making each‬ ‭sound slightly influenced by the surrounding sounds.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Why It Occurs: It’s more efficient and faster for smooth pronunciation.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Listener Adaptation: Listeners use context clues to interpret coarticulated sounds‬ ‭accurately.‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Example: The “n” sound in “can” sounds different when followed by a “t” (e.g.,‬ ‭“can take”) vs. a “p” (e.g., “can play”).‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Describe top-down and bottom-up language processing.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Definition: There’s no inherent connection between a sound and its meaning,‬ ‭which allows for flexibility in language.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Usefulness: Allows for diverse language creation and learning.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Example: The word “dog” has no natural link to the animal itself, so different‬ ‭languages use different sounds.‬ ‭6.‬ ‭In class, Professor Swingley talked about research that used eye-tracking to record‬ ‭where participants' visual gaze went when they heard the beginning of a statement‬ ‭like, "I wanted a turn..." He also gave some examples of hallucinatory word-finding‬ ‭in backward musical recordings. What important features of language processing‬ ‭do these examples demonstrate in common?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Syntax‬‭: The rules for structuring words into sentences.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Phrase Structure‬‭: Organizes language into units (phrases) to form complex‬ ‭ideas.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Novel Expression‬‭: Allows us to construct sentences never‬ ‭.‬ h d ‭ eard before.‬ ‭e.‬ ‭Example‬‭: “The curious cat sat quietly” can be easily understood due to‬ s‭ yntactical rules.‬ ‭7.‬ ‭What is incremental parsing in sentence comprehension?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Top-Down Processing‬‭: Understanding language based‬‭on‬‭context‬‭and prior‬ ‭knowledge.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Bottom-Up Processing‬‭: Interpreting language based‬‭on‬‭incoming sensory data‬ ‭(e.g., sounds).‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Example‬‭: Hearing the beginning of a sentence and predicting‬‭its end (top-down),‬ ‭or recognizing each word based on sounds (bottom-up).‬ 8‭.‬ ‭Does language affect thought? This theory has two flavors: that learning a‬ ‭particular language makes you think a certain way; or that learning any language‬ ‭makes thought possible. Give an illustrative example of each idea.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Language-Specific Thinking‬‭: Language shapes thought‬‭(e.g., Inuit languages‬ ‭have multiple words for snow, influencing perception).‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Language-Enables Thought‬‭: Language provides a structure‬‭for complex‬ ‭thought, enabling abstract ideas.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Example‬‭: Learning a language enables concepts like time and quantity.‬ ‭9.‬ ‭From the reading, describe why the hypothesis that “we think in language” is false.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Why It’s False‬‭: Thoughts can occur in‬‭non-linguistic‬‭forms‬‭(e.g., visual or‬ ‭sensory images), and preverbal children and animals also think without formal‬ ‭language.‬ ‭Lecture 13, Oct 24‬ ‭1.‬ ‭How do Paul Grice's principles of cooperative conversation apply to the following‬ ‭exchange?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Did your landlord finally get your toilet fixed? B: It looks like I'll be staying‬ ‭in a hotel this weekend.‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Paul's principles of cooperative conversation (Gricean Maxims) help to‬ ‭understand how implicature is communicated between speakers‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Quantity, Quality, Relation, and Manner‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Maxim of Quantity (information):‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Advises producing just the right amount of information – not too‬ ‭much not too little‬ ‭2.‬ ‭B’s response provides enough information for A to infer the‬ ‭situation without over-explaining‬ ‭3.‬ ‭By mentioning the hotel stay, B conveys the state of the unresolved‬ ‭issue‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Maxim of Quality (Truthfulness):‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Encourages speakers to provide truthful information and avoid‬ ‭statements for which they lack evidence‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Bs response implies truthfulness‬ ‭b.‬ S ‭ uggest a truthful, fact-based response about Bs future‬ ‭plans‬ ‭c.‬ ‭The statement is likely grounded in B's experience with the‬ ‭landlord's delay in repair‬ ‭v.‬ ‭Macism of Relation (Relevance):‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Suggest that the contribution should be relevant to the topic at‬ ‭hand‬ ‭2.‬ ‭B doesn't directly answer As question about the toilet being fixed‬ ‭but implies an answer through a relevant statement about staying in‬ ‭a hotel‬ ‭vi.‬ ‭Maxim of Manner (Clarity):‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Recommends avoiding ambiguity‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Bs response is indirect but not unclear‬ ‭3.‬ ‭The phrasing is specific enough for A to infer the unspoken‬ ‭message without ambiguity‬ ‭2.‬ ‭How does language affect our thoughts? What’s the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, in‬ ‭weaker forms and strong forms?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggest that the structure and vocabulary of a‬ ‭language shape its speaker's perception of reality and cognitive processes‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Strong Form:‬‭Linguistic Determinism:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Argues that language entirely determines thought‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭According to this view, people can only think in ways that their language‬ ‭allows or enables‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭If this were true, it would mean certain concepts or ways of thinking are‬ ‭only possible to speakers of specific languages‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Ex. language has no future tense, its speaker might have difficulty‬ ‭conceptualizing or planning for the future‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Weaker Form:‬‭Linguistic Relativity:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Proposes that language influences thought and perception but does not‬ ‭determine it entirely‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭The view suggests that speakers of different languages may think in‬ ‭different ways‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Ex. Studies show that language can affect how people perceive color,‬ ‭spatial orientation, and time.‬ ‭d.‬ ‭In its‬‭strong form‬‭, the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis (linguistic determinism) suggests‬ ‭that language limits and determines thought, a view that is largely unsupported. In‬ ‭its‬‭weaker form‬‭(linguistic relativity), it proposes that language influences‬ ‭thought patterns and perceptions, a view supported by evidence showing language‬ ‭can affect specific cognitive processes like color discrimination, spatial‬ ‭orientation, and temporal perception.‬ 3‭.‬ ‭Give an example in which the language that someone speaks has an influence on‬ ‭how he or she performs in a task.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Spatial Navigation and Cardinal Directions:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭In languages like Guugu Yimirthirr (spoken by Indigenous in Australia),‬ ‭speakers use cardinal directions (north, south) instead of relative directions‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭ hen asked to arrange objects or navigate spaces, these speakers‬ W ‭consistently use cardinal directions‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Studies show that speakers of such languages outperform others in spatial‬ ‭orientation tasks because their language requires them to have a‬ ‭heightened sense of geographic awareness. For instance, when given a set‬ ‭of photos and asked to arrange them in a sequence based on direction,‬ ‭speakers of cardinal-based languages are more accurate than speakers of‬ ‭relative-direction languages, who may find it challenging to keep track of‬ ‭directions without reorienting themselves.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭How does infants' ability to discriminate phonemes change over time?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭At birth, infants have a remarkable ability to distinguish phonemes from the world‬ ‭languages‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Ex. a four-month-old Japanese infant can distinguish between the English “R” and‬ ‭“I” sounds even though this distinction does not exist in Japan‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Around‬‭6 to 8 months‬‭, infants begin to focus on the phonemes that are more‬ ‭common in their native language(s) and start losing sensitivity to sounds not‬ ‭present in them.‬ ‭d.‬ ‭By‬‭9 to 12 months‬‭, infants become better at discriminating phonemes within their‬ ‭native language and less able to detect those from other languages. This process is‬ ‭known as‬‭perceptual narrowing‬‭.‬ ‭e.‬ ‭Example‬‭: By around 10 months, an English-speaking infant may lose the ability‬ ‭to distinguish between Hindi phonemes that they could distinguish at 6 months.‬ ‭However, they become more attuned to English-specific phonemes, like the‬ ‭distinction between the vowel sounds in "bat" and "bet."‬ 5‭.‬ ‭Distinguish between the "football throwing" model of conversation vs. the‬ ‭conversation as a project.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Football Throwing:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Conversations as a back-and-forth exchange similar to players throwing a‬ ‭football to one another‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Conversation as a project:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Views conversations as a collaborative project where both participants‬ ‭work together to build meaning‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭In a brainstorming session, two colleagues contribute ideas by expanding‬ ‭on each other’s thoughts, asking questions, and refining the concepts‬ ‭together. The conversation flows naturally with contributions that shape‬ ‭and build the shared “project” of the discussion.‬ ‭6.‬ ‭What are the empiricist and nativist perspectives on language learning?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Empiricist:‬‭Language learning is primarily the result of environmental input and‬ ‭experience‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Children learn language through exposure to linguistic input and by using‬ ‭general cognitive mechanisms‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Imitation‬‭: Children learn language by mimicking the sounds and‬ ‭structures they hear around them.‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Reinforcement‬‭: Positive reinforcement and feedback from caregivers help‬ ‭children associate words and structures with their meanings, shaping their‬ ‭language use.‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭ tatistical Learning‬‭: Research shows that infants can detect patterns in‬ S ‭speech sounds, such as which sounds frequently occur together, helping‬ ‭them segment words and phrases from the continuous stream of language.‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Ex. From an empiricist view, a child learns to say “dog” by hearing‬ ‭the word repeatedly associated with the animal, recognizing‬ ‭patterns in speech, and gradually refining their usage through‬ ‭feedback.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Nativist Perspective:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Humans are born with an innate predisposition for language learning‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭Language acquisition is guided by inborn linguistic structures or cognitive‬ ‭mechanisms‬ ‭iii.‬ ‭Universal Grammar (UG)‬‭: Proposed by Noam Chomsky, UG is the idea‬ ‭that all humans are born with an underlying set of grammatical rules‬ ‭common to all languages. This internal “blueprint” guides children in‬ ‭learning the specific rules of their native language.‬ ‭iv.‬ ‭Language Acquisition Device (LAD)‬‭: Chomsky also suggested that the‬ ‭brain has a specialized mechanism, the LAD, that allows children to detect‬ ‭grammatical structures and acquire language efficiently, even from limited‬ ‭input.‬ ‭v.‬ ‭Poverty of the Stimulus‬‭: Nativists argue that children often produce‬ ‭complex sentences they have never directly heard, suggesting that‬ ‭environmental input alone cannot explain language acquisition.‬ ‭vi.‬ ‭Example‬‭: A nativist would argue that children learn grammatical‬ ‭structures, like subject-verb agreement, not by explicit instruction or‬ ‭reinforcement, but through their inherent ability to identify and apply‬ ‭these patterns due to an innate grammar framework.‬ ‭7.‬ ‭Three arguments for the nativist perspective of language involve unrelated language‬ ‭similarity, poverty of the stimulus, and animal communication. Summarize each of‬ ‭these arguments.‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Unrelated Language SImuilarity:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭The‬‭universal similarities‬‭found across unrelated languages suggest that‬ ‭all humans share an inherent, biologically-based capacity for language.‬ ‭Linguists have observed that, despite vast cultural and linguistic‬ ‭differences, languages worldwide share certain structural features, such as‬ ‭nouns and verbs, hierarchical syntax, and the ability to form complex‬ ‭sentences.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭Poverty of the Stimulus:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Suggests that the language input children receive is often limited,‬ ‭ambiguous, or incomplete, yet they are still able to acquire complex‬ ‭grammar rules.‬ ‭ii.‬ ‭For example, children can form sentences they’ve never heard before,‬ ‭follow grammatical structures without explicit teaching, and quickly‬ ‭develop language fluency.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Animal Communication:‬ ‭i.‬ ‭Although some animals can learn symbolic communication (like‬ ‭chimpanzees using sign language), their communication systems lack the‬ c‭ omplexity, structure, and generative capacity of human language.‬ ‭Animals do not naturally develop hierarchical syntax, recursive structures,‬ ‭or the ability to create an infinite number of unique sentences.‬ ‭8.‬ ‭How do children learn words and develop their ability to produce speech?‬ ‭a.‬ ‭Early Recognition and Babbling (0–10 months)‬‭: Infants recognize familiar‬ ‭sounds and begin babbling (e.g., "ba-ba"), experimenting with speech sounds.‬ ‭Caregiver responses encourage continued practice.‬ ‭b.‬ ‭First Words (10–15 months)‬‭: Around their first year, infants start using single‬ ‭words for familiar objects, sometimes overextending (calling all animals "dog")‬ ‭or underextending (using "dog" only for the family pet) meanings.‬ ‭c.‬ ‭Vocabulary Explosion (18–24 months)‬‭: A rapid increase in vocabulary occurs,‬ ‭with children learning new words quickly using‬‭fast‬‭mapping‬‭(linking new words‬ ‭to objects after minimal exposure).‬ ‭d.‬ ‭Combining Words (24 months)‬‭: Children form two-word phrases (e.g., "more‬ ‭juice") using basic grammar. This‬‭telegraphic speech‬‭includes essential words‬ ‭while omitting smaller ones.‬ ‭e.‬ ‭Grammar Refinement (3–5 years)‬‭: Language use becomes more complex as‬ ‭children create full sentences, refine grammar, and develop conversational skills.‬ ‭Errors like‬‭overregularization‬‭(e.g., “goed” for "went") reflect their‬ ‭understanding of language rules.‬ ‭‬ ‭ eversability‬ R ‭‬ ‭Convervation → Water Example‬ ‭‬ ‭Linguistic determinism‬ ‭‬ ‭B) Linguistic relativity‬ ‭‬ ‭Coarticulation‬ ‭‬ ‭The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis‬‭.‬ ‭‬ ‭Exemplar theory‬ ‭‬ ‭Incremental parsing‬ ‭‬ ‭Self-serving bias‬ ‭‬ ‭Top down processing‬ ‭‬ ‭Bottom up processing‬ ‭‬ ‭Feature Dedection Theory‬ ‭‬ ‭Context Dependent memeroy‬ ‭‬ ‭Justice reasoning‬ ‭‬ ‭Elaborative rehearsal‬ ‭‬ ‭Fundamental attribution error‬ ‭‬ ‭Encoding specificity principle‬ ‭‬ ‭Incremental parsing vs top down processing‬ ‭State-dependent memory‬ ‭Context-dependent memory‬ ‭Encoding specificity principle‬

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser