History Lesson 3: Historical Method at ang Pantayong Pananaw PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by Deleted User
Tags
Summary
This document discusses the historical method and analysis, specifically for Philippine contexts. It outlines primary and secondary source analysis, types of criticism, and synthesizing historical narratives.
Full Transcript
HISTORY 100: READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY Napulot ka lang sa tae ng kalabaw! Hindi ba? Paano mo nasabi? WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS ABOUT THE STUDY OF HISTORY READING ACTIVITY Paano inaaral ang Kasaysayan? Historical History Method at Lesson 3: ang Pantayong...
HISTORY 100: READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY Napulot ka lang sa tae ng kalabaw! Hindi ba? Paano mo nasabi? WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS ABOUT THE STUDY OF HISTORY READING ACTIVITY Paano inaaral ang Kasaysayan? Historical History Method at Lesson 3: ang Pantayong Pananaw comprises the techniques and guidelines by which historians use primary HISTORICAL sources and other evidence to research and METHOD then to write histories in the form of accounts of the past. The question of the nature, and even the possibility, of a sound historical method is raised in the HISTORICAL philosophy of history as a question of epistemology. The METHOD study of historical method and writing is known as historiography. Watch https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=GTmkJ This 4cHleQ Positivism the name for the scientific study of the social world. Its goal is to formulate abstract and universal laws on the operative dynamics of the social universe. A law is a statement about relationships among forces in the universe. In positivism, laws are to be tested against collected data systematically. What are two types of Sources in studying History? Secondary Source: An account, Primary Source: A first-hand record, or evidence that comes account, record, or evidence from an original or primary about a person, place object, or source I heard or learned about an event. I was there or It was it from somebody/something there. who was there. What are two types of Criticism in studying History? External criticism: Internal criticism: authenticity and historical provenance reliability External criticism: authenticity and provenance Noting that few documents are accepted as completely reliable, Louis Gottschalk sets down the general rule, "for each particular of a document the process of Internal establishing credibility should be separately criticism: undertaken regardless of historical the general credibility of the author." An author's reliability trustworthiness in the main may establish a background probability for the consideration of each statement, but each piece of evidence extracted must be weighed individually. Once individual pieces of information have been Synthesis: assessed in context, Historical hypotheses can be formed Reasoning and established by historical reasoning. “History gives answers only to those who know how to ask questions.” Hajo Holborn, German-American historian (1902-1969)