DF347 Networks Forensics 2024/2025 PDF

Summary

Presentation slides for a computer networks and forensics course at Al-Balqa Applied University covering topics like computer networks layers, encapsulation and decapsulation, and forensic science.

Full Transcript

DF347 Networks Forensics 2024/2025 – Semester 1 Week 2 13th – 17th October 2024 [email protected] Dr. Basil Elmasri [email protected] Computer Networks Layers...

DF347 Networks Forensics 2024/2025 – Semester 1 Week 2 13th – 17th October 2024 [email protected] Dr. Basil Elmasri [email protected] Computer Networks Layers Internet OSI 7-layer 5-layer Model reference TCP/IP (hybrid) Application protocol suite model Presentation Application Application Session Transport Transport Transport Internet Network Network Network Data Link Data Link Access/Interface Physical Physical Encapsulation and Decapsulation Data itself … Data … 5-layer model →Encapsulation→ ←Decapsulation← Application Message HTTP, FTP, RTP… Header … Data … Transport Segment TCP – UDP Header … Data … ↓ ↑ Network Packet IP Header … Data … Data Link Frame MAC Header … Data … Trailer Physical … 0's and 1’s … Encapsulation and Decapsulation Example Server A sends webpage to B, after B has requested it, the page is broken down into chunks. Each chunk is appended with headers on each layer then sent to B via the internet. HTTP header is added, then TCP, then IP, then the MAC header and trailer to create a “Frame”. PC A The frame is converted to 0’s and 1’s, then A push it PC B (Server) (Client) through the connecting media to B. B receives the bits and gather them into a frame. B removes the MAC header and trailer, then the IP HTTP Data Data Encapsulation header, then the TCP header, then the HTTP header, to HTTP HTTP TCP Data Decapsulation Data get a chunk of the page. At the end B adds this chunk to the page. TCP TCP Data Data IP Each chunk is sent in such way to create a full display of MAC Tail IP IP Data Data the webpage. MAC MAC Tail Tail Data Data … 01010101 … Forensic science Forensic science may be defined as any science that is used in the service of the justice system, the investigation and resolution in both civil disputes and criminal cases. (Jackson & Jackson, 2017) In practice, forensic science is more likely to be involved in the investigation and resolution of criminal cases. The science of associating people, places, and things involved in criminal activities; these scientific disciplines assist in investigating and adjudicating criminal and civil cases. The discipline divides neatly into halves, like the words that describes it. (Houck & Siegel, 2015). Forensic Science The discipline divides neatly into halves, like the words that describes it. “Science” is the collection of systematic methodologies used to increasingly understand the physical world. The word “forensic” is derived from the Latin forum for “public”. In other words; “Forensic Science” is an apt term for the profession of scientists whose work answers questions for the courts through reports and testimony. Forensic Science – UK Home Office Forensic science is the application of science to a criminal investigation and court proceedings. This includes crime scene investigation and the collection, identification, analysis and interpretation of potential evidence such as DNA, fingerprints, digital evidence, drug analysis and footwear marks. The Government’s vision for forensic science is for a clearer system of governance to ensure quality standards and proper ethical oversight, and a cost-effective service that delivers to law enforcement and the Criminal Justice System (CJS) robust and relevant forensic evidence, and in so doing strengthens public and judicial trust in forensic science. Forensic Science Strategy Presented to Parliament, A national approach to forensic science delivery in the criminal justice system. By the Secretary of State for the Home Department, by Command of Her Majesty. March 2016. Evidences Processing A crime scene may mean any location, such as a building, garden or field, or person (whether alive or dead) that is to be searched for physical evidence. Involvement of forensic science in the investigation and resolution of criminal offences begins at the crime scene. Three distinct phases, in particular for a physical evidence. Evidences Processing 1. The recovery and continuity of A typical route of an evidence. item recovered from a crime scene to the 2. Examination and court, in UK laboratory work on the recovered evidence. 3. The interpretation and evaluation of scientific evidence and the presentation of scientific test results in court and justice systems. Recovery and Continuity of Evidence (I) A successful crime scene processing is a proper and successful identification and recovery of items of physical evidence. In the UK, this task is normally carried out by Scenes of Crime Officers (SOCOs), Forensic Scene Investigators (FSIs), or Crime Scene Investigators (CSIs). Other personnel may also recover evidence. These include police officers, who may, for example, take items of evidence from suspects, forensic medical examiners and forensic scientists. Once items of physical evidence are recovered, the must be separately and appropriately packaged, labelled, stored and transported to usually the laboratory for the next stage. Recovery and Continuity of Evidence (II) Integrity of each individual item of physical evidence must be maintained from the point of its recovery at the crime scene through to its possible appearance as a court exhibit. It must be possible to demonstrate that this continuity of evidence has occurred. For each item, records must be kept that show: - The chronology of who has been responsible for its safekeeping and appropriate handling (the chain of custody). - The measures taken to guard against evidence tampering, accidental contamination, deterioration and mislabelling. In some serious incidents, an involvement of a dedicated exhibits officer will help to ensure continuity of the evidence. Recovery and Continuity of Evidence (III) Evidence Continuity: provision of a complete documented account of the progress of an item of evidence since its recovery from a crime scene. If this cannot be adequately demonstrated, the evidence in question may be ruled inadmissible in court. Loss of Integrity of an Evidence Loss of integrity Tampering Accidental contamination Deterioration Accidental mislabelling of evidence Loss of Integrity – Tampering Tamper-evident seals on evidence packaging, with dedicated and secure evidence storage facilities. - See Tamper evident bags guidance, by UK Home Office Specialist self-adhesive closures that cannot be opened without obvious damage to the seal. Signatures across seals in evidence packaging made using either conventional self-adhesive tape or specialist tamper-evident tape. Opening packaging away from previous seals so that the integrity of those seals can still be seen. Secure concurrent and simultaneous note taking. An uninterrupted, documented, chain of custody. - Minimising the number of people in the chain of custody. Assiduous use of logging systems. Loss of Integrity – Accidental Contamination Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that incorporate anti- contamination procedures, such as: - The isolation of bulk and trace evidence. - The use of appropriate personal protective equipment. - Avoid between-sample cross-contamination ▪ Decontamination of surfaces and/or people to guard against cross-contamination between samples. ▪ The use of disposable equipment where appropriate to. - Isolation of samples from victims and suspects and from different crime scenes associated with the same case. Minimising the need to open evidence packaging, - Transparent panels packages so its contents can be seen. Re-packaging each item as soon as it has been analysed or examined. Assiduous use of logging systems and contemporaneous note taking to show compliance with anti-contamination SOPs. Loss of Integrity – Deterioration Appropriate packaging and storage. Assiduous use of logging systems. Contemporaneous note taking to show use of appropriate packaging and storage. Loss of Integrity –Accidental Mislabelling of Evidence The use of SOPs specifically designed to minimise the opportunity for mislabelling. The assiduous use of contemporaneous notes to demonstrate compliance with these SOPs. References Jackson, R. A., & Jackson, J. M. (2017). Forensic Science (4 ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education. Secretary of State for the Home Department. (2016). Forensic Science Strategy Presented to Parliament, A national approach to forensic science delivery in the criminal justice system. UK Home Office. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uplo ads/attachment_data/file/506683/54493_Cm_9217_Forensic_Science_St rategy_Print_ready.pdf.

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser