Benchmark for Administrative Grades in Railway Services PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by Deleted User
null
2017
null
null
Tags
Summary
This document provides benchmarks for promotion to administrative grades in Indian railway services, offering instructions for numerical grading in APARs and interpretations for grades HAG, SAG, NFSG, and JAG, and specific instructions for performance appraisal purposes. The document has guidelines for the grading for the years 2016 and 2017.
Full Transcript
^{IVry?.,^.{\-Yo t, t/"...
^{IVry?.,^.{\-Yo t, t/" Govemment oflndia(Bharat Sarkar) Ll' ti ','n'o"l:ilil:il'al3ll'*uo"', No.2t17lSCC/o3/09 ,'NewDelhi, dated 16.04.18 l0 TheGeneral Manager/equivalent (AllIndian Railways, PUSs, RDSO,NAIR, Directors/Training Institutes). ,-i'!s'.#iJ- * Subject: forpromotion Benchmark grades toadministrative inRailway Services. Reference : Board's letter No.2017/SGC/03/09 dated 01.09.17 and23.11.1T. Board,videlefterdated01.09.17 and23.11.17,issuedinstructions regarding interpretation of thebenchmarkfor promotion grades to various in termsof numericalgrading.Afterconsidering severalissues relatingto interpretation of benchmark, Boardhavenowdecided to followthefollowing revisedinterpretation of benchmarkin reipectof ApARswith grading numerical : Grade Benchmarkas per instructionsdated lnterpretation ofbenchmark consequffia-iniffin 15.12.15 ofAPARs qradinq withnumerical ,* HAG VeryGoodPlus- two'Outstanding' and Bench markwillmntinue to 6e 'Vdffi[ ptusie. three'VeryGood'gnadingin thelastfive minimum two 'Outstandjgrg' ad_three'VeryGood' yean. However, minimum'VeryGood' in grading or equivalent,iir fre la$ffiveApARsunder eachofthelastfiveAPARs considerationclassifyirfu thenrgrerical gnading interms of'Outstanding','VeryGod'aiiO'0ooO' asperBoard's instructionsdged21.07.17. A minimum gndingof 'VeryGooQ' isBhorequired ineachofthefiveApARs. SAG VeryGood- Theminimum performance Bench markwillcontinue to OeVeryCooO ie. rnininurm and benchmark willbe'VeryGood'in eachol gnading'of 'Veryasod' ineachof thetastfiveApARs NFSG thelastfiveAPARs. &*er corrideration classifying lhenumerical grading in ter@l'Outstanding', 'Very Good'and 'Good' asper dated ,Boardtsinstructions 21.01.17. JAG Good- shouldhave eamedtwo $Sy ffi ma* will be'Good plus'which willbedefined as Good' and three 'Good' 'Very gradjng or ,.,!.wo Good' 'Good'APARs and three in the lastfive equivalentinthetastnvenFRni r i IPARsunderconsideration classiffing 0renumerical grading in termsof '0utstanding', 'VeryGood' and sil'%.rs 'Good'asperBoard's instructions dated21.07.17. A minimum grading of 'Good'is alsorequired ineachof.W*\.'t thefiveAPARs. assessment suffiereriP DPCshculdnotbeguiffiperely ffithe overallgradin thatmayberecorded inttreAPARsbutshould makcitsown onthebasis grtrieS\$e APARS, AF as at timesthe overallgradingin a ApARmaybe inconsistent ivithlhe grading undervarious €ffinoraffibutes. 3. Railways/PUsetcl advisedthatempanelmenupromotion of officenmadeonthebasisof instructions dated 01.09.17 neednd be unlessthesamehasadversely theirpromotion. affected Above mentioned decisionshouldbe brought tothenotiryofalbTficers workinginrespective RailwiysipUs/CTls..\ Sck^*l.g j " \ q (SCKrishna) * Ws:*.. Under Secretary (Conf) ,'&tu"-i '*qq Railway Board..4 z e*r\, Copyto i A_" W Allofficers inRailway Board %e C&lSforuploadinginnEtSwebsite NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDIAN RAILI.YAYMEN (N,F,I,R,).. r 3, ChelmsforLEoad,NewDelhi No.II/7 Dated26/04/2018 Copylorwarded to the General Secretariesof afliliated Unions of NFIR tor information and guidance, C/: Media Centre/NFIR. ,f-tq (Dr. M. Raghavaiah) General
