Developmental & Life-Course Theories PDF

Document Details

ExtraordinaryChicago

Uploaded by ExtraordinaryChicago

Loyola University Chicago

Tags

criminological theory life-course theories developmental psychology sociology

Summary

This document provides a summary of the lecture notes on Developmental & Life-Course Theories, discussing the work of Glueck and Glueck, and Sampson and Laub, specifically emphasizing the role of the family and social control and delving into important criminological theory concepts.

Full Transcript

Developmental & Life-Course Theories Chapter 14 DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE & CRIMINOLOGY Life-Course Theories  Sheldon & Eleanor Glueck  Harvard University, 1920s–1960s  1950 – Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency   Life histories of 500 boys...

Developmental & Life-Course Theories Chapter 14 DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE & CRIMINOLOGY Life-Course Theories  Sheldon & Eleanor Glueck  Harvard University, 1920s–1960s  1950 – Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency   Life histories of 500 boys sent to reform school in 1930s  Data on each juvenile collected at ages 14, 25, & 32  A history of discrimination, rivalries, & obscurity  Theoretic “rivals” with the Edwin Sutherland Life-Course Theories  Glueck & Glueck (1950) – Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency  Life histories of 500 boys sent to reform school in 1930s  Data on each juvenile collected at ages 14, 25, & 32  Rob Sampson (Harvard) & John Laub (Maryland)  Sampson “discovered several boxes” of Glueck data in Harvard Law basement  Secured a grant to digitized early life histories & collected follow‐up interviews of the men [then in their late 60s/ early 70s]  Gives birth to:  Age‐graded theory of informal social control  (Sampson & Laub, 1993; Laub & Sampson, 2003)  Understanding that desistance from crime is  “a process, not an event” LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Sampson & Laub’s Theory  Age-graded theory of informal social control  Draws heavily on social control theory (Hirschi, 1969)  4 Components or Elements  ↑Social bonds  ↑socially controlled behavior  ↑conformity  ↑Social bonding with parents, teachers, & peers  ↑conformity  ↑Weak/ a enuated or broken social bonds  ↑deviance/ delinquency  Informal social control explains changes in criminal behavior over the life‐course (Sampson & Laub, 2005)  Independent of prior individual differences in criminal propensity (Glueck & Glueck, 1950; Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Sampson & Laub’s Theory  Informal social control explains changes in criminal behavior over the life-course (Sampson & Laub, 2005)  ↑Social controls over individuals & their behavior  Turning points can produce gradual &/or abrupt changes in: 1) social controls + 2) social opportunities  3 Turning points: marriage, meaningful employment, & military service  ↓Social controls…  ↑likelihood of persistent offending  Absence of turning point changes  Disruptive family & employment experiences (e.g., a bad marriage is not the same as a good marriage)  Delinquency sets into motion a variety of impediments to successful transitions to adulthood  This cumulative disadvantage undermines potential bonds that may emerge in adulthood (i.e., good marriage & employment) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Sampson & Laub’s Theory  Informal social control explains changes in criminal behavior over the life-course (Sampson & Laub, 2005)  ↑Social controls…  ↓likelihood of persistent offending  Turning points can produce gradual/ abrupt social control + opportunity change  Emphasis on the role of the family in exercising both  Relational control (via attachment) &  Instrumental control (via monitoring & supervision)  Downplays the role of peers  Mark Warr (1993; 1998; 2002) sharply disagrees LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Sampson & Laub’s Theory  Informal social control explains changes in criminal behavior over the life-course (Sampson & Laub, 2005)  Emphasis on the role of the family in exercising both relational control (via attachment) & instrumental control (via monitoring & supervision)  Downplays the role of peers  Warr (1993; 1998; 2002) & the particular role of peers  Life‐course transitions in family/ work account for persistence/ change  But, these transi ons mark drama c ↓ me spent with friends & ↓delinquent peer exposure  Is persistence & change a result of changes in “informal social controls” or “peer associations”? LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Sampson & Laub’s Theory For This Week…  For Wednesday (Dec. 4th), read:  Chapter 15 – Integrating Criminological Theory LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser