Developmental & Life-Course Theories PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by ExtraordinaryChicago
Loyola University Chicago
Tags
Summary
This document is a chapter on Developmental & Life-Course Theories, focusing on patterns of criminal behavior over time. It discusses various theories, research findings, and key concepts related to the subject.
Full Transcript
Developmental & Life-Course Theories Chapter 14 DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE & CRIMINOLOGY Developmental & Life-Course Attempt to make sense of patterns of criminal behavior over time Research demonstrates Criminal activity peaks in adolescence, then gradual...
Developmental & Life-Course Theories Chapter 14 DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE & CRIMINOLOGY Developmental & Life-Course Attempt to make sense of patterns of criminal behavior over time Research demonstrates Criminal activity peaks in adolescence, then gradually declines in older age groups (Blumstein et al., 1986; Farrington, Piquero, & Jennings, 2013) Some individuals show consistent level of criminal (or conforming) behavior throughout their lives Some individuals show variability in criminality as they age (Laub & Sampson, 2003; Sampson & Laub, 1993) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Developmental & Life-Course Age-Crime Debate Age‐crime curve – ↑ crime rate in early adolescence, peaks in mid‐to‐late teenage years, & ↓ through early adulthood (Farrington, 1986) Emerging adults – between 18 to 25 years old (Arnet, 2000) Critiques (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990; Hirschi & Gottfredson, 1983) “Misapplication” of age‐crime distribution to advocate for longitudinal methods – vs. cheaper cross‐sectional (Hirschi & Gottfredson, 1983) Age crime curve an artifact of “changes in opportunity”, not criminal propensity (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Developmental & Life-Course Criminal Careers Informed by early life‐history & longitudinal works (Shaw, 1930; Glueck & Glueck, 1950; Wolfgang, Figlio, & Sellin, 1972) Focus on explaining if, how, & why certain factors may effect (Blumstein et al., 1986) Onset – initiation of criminal activity Continuity – continuation & escalation of criminal activity Change – desistance/ termination of criminal activity 5 Dimensions Prevalence; frequency; age of onset; age of desistance; criminal career length LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Criminal Careers: 5 Dimensions Prevalence – how many people involved (at any level)? By age 30, as high as 96% in self‐report & 40% in official conviction records (Farrington, 2002) Frequency – number of offenses by actively involved? Peak at age 16 in self‐report & 17–20 for official convictions, then a gradual decline (Piquero, Farrington, & Blumstein, 2003) Age of onset – age at 1st crime committed Ranges from age 13–19; earlier in self‐report & later in official records (Elliott, Huizinga, & Morse, 1987; Tibbetts & Piquero, 1999) Minor crimes peak at age 13–14 More serious crime peak at age 17–19 (Farrington, 1990) Earlier onset related to ↑frequency & longer criminal career (Farrington et al., 1998; 2013) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Criminal Careers: 5 Dimensions Prevalence – how many people involved (at any level)? Frequency – number of offenses by actively involved? Age of onset – age at 1st crime committed Age of desistance – age of last crime committed “True” desistance – just because you stop, does not mean you are done Ranges from age 20–29 (Farrington, 1992) Criminal career length Criminal career length = (age of desistance) – (age of onset) Average of 10.4 years from 1st to ‘last’ conviction (Farrington, 1992) Average of 7.1 years with one‐time offenders included Average of 25.6 years for all crime (Laub & Sampson, 2003) Average of 9.2 years for violent & 13.6 years for property crime Most desist by middle adulthood (Laub & Sampson, 2003) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO Developmental & Life-Course Key Theories Self‐control theory (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) Developmental pathways model (Loeber et al., 1993) Integrated cogitative antisocial potential theory (Farrington, 2005) Developmental [or dual] taxonomy (Moffitt, 1993) Age‐graded theory of informal social control (Sampson & Laub, 1993; 2003) Life‐course perspective on social learning (Giordano, 2010) LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO For Next Week… For Monday (Nov. 25th) : Developmental & Life‐Course Theories (cont.) For Wednesday & Friday (Nov. 27th & 29th): NO Class – Thanksgiving Break LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO