Why were Jyotirao Phule and Ramaswamy Naicker critical of the national movement? Did their criticism help the national struggle in any way?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for an analysis of Jyotirao Phule and Ramaswamy Naicker's critiques of the national movement in India. It aims to explore the reasons behind their criticism and whether it had any impact on the national struggle for independence.
Answer
Jyotirao Phule and Ramaswamy Naicker criticized the national movement for neglecting lower-caste concerns, prompting more inclusive policies.
Jyotirao Phule and Ramaswamy Naicker criticized the national movement because they believed it mainly served upper-caste interests and did not address the concerns of lower-caste people. Their criticism highlighted caste discrimination, prompting nationalist leaders to promise equality, thus making the movement more inclusive.
Answer for screen readers
Jyotirao Phule and Ramaswamy Naicker criticized the national movement because they believed it mainly served upper-caste interests and did not address the concerns of lower-caste people. Their criticism highlighted caste discrimination, prompting nationalist leaders to promise equality, thus making the movement more inclusive.
More Information
Phule and Naicker's criticism of the national movement was centered around the fact that it largely overlooked the issues faced by marginalized communities. Notably, their advocacy helped in gradually acknowledging the need for social reforms alongside political independence.
Tips
A common mistake is ignoring the socio-political context of India during the independence movement, where caste dynamics played a crucial role.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
