Why is Wikipedia not considered to be a credible source?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for the reasons why Wikipedia is often viewed skeptically regarding its credibility as a source of information. It seeks to uncover the factors that contribute to this perception.
Answer
Wikipedia's user-editable nature makes it unreliable.
Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because its user-generated nature allows anyone to edit, which can lead to inaccurate, incomplete, or vandalized information.
Answer for screen readers
Wikipedia is not considered a credible source because its user-generated nature allows anyone to edit, which can lead to inaccurate, incomplete, or vandalized information.
More Information
Wikipedia is excellent for initial research and finding sources but should not be cited directly in academic works.
Tips
A common mistake is relying solely on Wikipedia for factual information without verification from more authoritative sources.
Sources
- Why You Cannot Use Wikipedia as an Academic Source - APU Edge - apuedge.com
- What's Wrong with Wikipedia? | Harvard Guide to Using Sources - usingsources.fas.harvard.edu
- Why is Wikipedia not considered a reliable source of information? - reddit.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
